Suppr超能文献

气体交换的抽查分析:有创与无创方法

Spot check analysis of gas exchange: invasive versus noninvasive methods.

作者信息

Ekkernkamp Emelie, Welte Lena, Schmoor Claudia, Huttmann Sophie Emilia, Dreher Michael, Windisch Wolfram, Storre Jan Hendrik

机构信息

Department of Pneumology, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Respiration. 2015;89(4):294-303. doi: 10.1159/000371769. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Correct measurement of PO₂ and PCO₂ is essential to establish appropriate therapy such as long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in patients suffering from respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare common invasive and noninvasive methods for assessing blood gas components for spot check analysis.

METHODS

Arterial (PaO₂, PaCO₂) and capillary blood gas (PCBGO2, PCBGCO2) measurements were taken consecutively in a randomized order and were compared with noninvasive measurements obtained from the transcutaneous monitoring of PO₂ and PCO₂ (PtcOv, PtcCO₂, sensor-temperature 44°C). Capillary samples were taken from both arterialized earlobes, where samples of right earlobes were defined as a reference value. Pain assessment of all measurements was evaluated by each subject using the 100-mm visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

83 patients and 17 healthy subjects were included. The mean difference between PaO₂ and PtcO₂ was 11.9 ± 15.0 mm Hg, with lower limits of agreement (LLA) of -17.4 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -22.5 to -12.3 mm Hg), and upper limits of agreement (ULA) of 41.1 mm Hg (95% CI 36.0-46.2 mm Hg). The comparison of PaO₂ with PCBGO2 showed a mean difference of 5.6 ± 7.2 mm Hg (LLA -11.0; ULA 19.6 mm Hg). The mean difference between PaCO₂ and PtcCO₂ was 1.1 ± 4.9 mm Hg (LLA -8.6; ULA 10.8 mm Hg) and that between PaCO₂ and PCBGCO₂ was 0.7 ± 2.0 mm Hg (LLA -3.3; ULA 4.8 mm Hg). The analysis of capillary blood gases (36.2 ± 22.3 mm) was rated as more painful than the analysis of arterial blood gases (26.1 ± 20.6 mm), while transcutaneous measurement was rated as the least painful method (1.9 ± 7.4 mm; all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The comparison of different methods for blood gas measurements showed substantial differences between capillary and arterial PO₂ and between transcutaneous and arterial PO₂. Therefore, arterial PO₂ analysis is the essential method evaluating indication for LTOT. Nevertheless, comparative analysis further indicated capillary PCO₂ as an adequate surrogate for arterial PCO₂.

摘要

背景

准确测量氧分压(PO₂)和二氧化碳分压(PCO₂)对于为呼吸衰竭患者制定适当的治疗方案(如长期氧疗,LTOT)至关重要。

目的

我们旨在比较用于血气成分点检查分析的常见有创和无创方法。

方法

以随机顺序连续采集动脉血(PaO₂、PaCO₂)和毛细血管血气(PCBGO₂、PCBGCO₂),并与经皮监测PO₂和PCO₂(PtcO₂、PtcCO₂,传感器温度44°C)获得的无创测量值进行比较。毛细血管样本取自两侧动脉化耳垂,其中右耳垂样本被定义为参考值。每位受试者使用100毫米视觉模拟量表对所有测量的疼痛程度进行评估。

结果

纳入83例患者和17名健康受试者。PaO₂与PtcO₂之间的平均差值为11.9±15.0毫米汞柱,一致性下限(LLA)为 -17.4毫米汞柱(95%置信区间(CI)-22.5至-12.3毫米汞柱),一致性上限(ULA)为41.1毫米汞柱(95%CI 36.0 - 46.2毫米汞柱)。PaO₂与PCBGO₂的比较显示平均差值为5.6±7.2毫米汞柱(LLA -11.0;ULA 19.6毫米汞柱)。PaCO₂与PtcCO₂之间的平均差值为1.1±4.9毫米汞柱(LLA -8.6;ULA 10.8毫米汞柱),PaCO₂与PCBGCO₂之间的平均差值为0.7±2.0毫米汞柱(LLA -3.3;ULA 4.8毫米汞柱)。毛细血管血气分析(36.2±22.3毫米)的疼痛程度被评为高于动脉血气分析(26.1±20.6毫米),而经皮测量被评为疼痛程度最低的方法(1.9±7.4毫米;所有p<0.0001)。

结论

不同血气测量方法的比较显示,毛细血管与动脉PO₂之间以及经皮与动脉PO₂之间存在显著差异。因此,动脉PO₂分析是评估LTOT指征的关键方法。然而,对比分析进一步表明毛细血管PCO₂可作为动脉PCO₂的合适替代指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验