Feger Mark A, Goetschius John, Love Hailey, Saliba Sue A, Hertel Jay
University of Virginia, USA.
Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Nov;16(4):361-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess whether electrical stimulation (ES), when used in conjunction with a standard treatment, can reduce levels of functional impairment, edema, and pain compared to a standard treatment alone, in patients following a lateral ankle sprain. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, SportDiscus, and Medline (OVID) databases through June 2014 using the terms "ankle sprain or ankle sprains or ligament injury or ligamentous injury," and "electric stimulation or electric stimulation or electrotherapy." Our search identified four randomized control trials, of which, neuromuscular ES and high-voltage pulsed stimulation were the only two ES modalities utilized. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cohen's d for comparison between treatment groups. Three of four effect sizes for function had 95% CI that crossed zero. Twenty-four of the thirty-two effect sizes for edema had 95% CI that crossed zero. All effect sizes for pain had 95% CI that crossed zero. Therefore, the use of ES is not recommended as a means to improve function, reduce edema, or decrease pain in the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains.
本系统评价的目的是评估在外侧踝关节扭伤患者中,电刺激(ES)与标准治疗联合使用时,相较于单纯标准治疗,是否能降低功能障碍、水肿和疼痛的程度。我们在2014年6月前检索了PubMed、CINAHL、SportDiscus和Medline(OVID)数据库,使用的检索词为“踝关节扭伤或踝关节扭伤或韧带损伤或韧带性损伤”以及“电刺激或电刺激或电疗法”。我们的检索确定了四项随机对照试验,其中,神经肌肉电刺激和高压脉冲刺激是仅有的两种使用的电刺激方式。使用Cohen's d估计效应量和95%置信区间(CI),用于治疗组之间的比较。四项功能效应量中有三项的95%CI跨过了零点。32项水肿效应量中有24项的95%CI跨过了零点。所有疼痛效应量的95%CI都跨过了零点。因此,不建议将电刺激作为改善急性外侧踝关节扭伤治疗中功能、减轻水肿或缓解疼痛的手段。