• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

媒体来源、可信度与科学认知:了解人们如何获取科学知识。

Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science: Learning about how people learn about science.

作者信息

Takahashi Bruno, Tandoc Edson C

机构信息

Michigan State University, USA

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2016 Aug;25(6):674-90. doi: 10.1177/0963662515574986. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1177/0963662515574986
PMID:25792288
Abstract

Knowledge about science and technology has become increasingly important in this age of digital information overload. It is also becoming increasingly important to understand what contributes to scientific learning, including information sources and trust in those sources. In this study, we develop and test a multivariate model to explain scientific knowledge based on past theories on learning from the news from the fields of political communication, sociology, and media psychology. We focus on the impact of sources-by platform, such as television and online, and by expertise, such as scientists and the media-in understanding what predicts scientific knowledge. The results show that interest in science not only directly predicts knowledge but also has indirect effects on knowledge through its effects on Internet use, confidence in the press, and perception of scientists. In addition, distrust on the news sources is an important pathway to learning about science.

摘要

在这个数字信息过载的时代,关于科学技术的知识变得越来越重要。理解促成科学学习的因素,包括信息来源以及对这些来源的信任,也变得越来越重要。在本研究中,我们基于政治传播学、社会学和媒体心理学领域中关于从新闻中学习的过往理论,开发并测试了一个多变量模型来解释科学知识。我们聚焦于信息来源的影响——按平台划分,如电视和网络;按专业性划分,如科学家和媒体——以了解哪些因素能够预测科学知识。结果表明,对科学的兴趣不仅直接预测知识水平,还通过其对互联网使用、对新闻媒体的信任以及对科学家的认知的影响,对知识产生间接影响。此外,对新闻来源的不信任是了解科学的一条重要途径。

相似文献

1
Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science: Learning about how people learn about science.媒体来源、可信度与科学认知:了解人们如何获取科学知识。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Aug;25(6):674-90. doi: 10.1177/0963662515574986. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
2
Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.用规范语言描述科学发现:关于信任和可信度影响的随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 30;25:e45482. doi: 10.2196/45482.
3
Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change.无知还是偏见?评估气候变化沟通差距的意识形态和信息驱动因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Apr;24(3):285-301. doi: 10.1177/0963662514545909. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
4
An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.对科学的攻击?媒体使用、对科学家的信任以及对全球变暖的认知。
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):866-83. doi: 10.1177/0963662513480091. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
5
Primary Scientific Literature Is Not Just for Students and Academics: a Study of Primary Source Modalities and Predictors of Learning across Adulthood.原发性科学文献并非仅适用于学生和学者:一项关于成年期原始资料形式及学习预测因素的研究。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Feb 6;24(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00122-22. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Sources in science: who can we trust?科学来源:我们能信任谁?
Lancet. 1996 May 11;347(9011):1308-11. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90947-2.
7
Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.在与积极主动的受众就科学话题进行交流时获得信任和尊重。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317505111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
8
Emotional news affects social judgments independent of perceived media credibility.情绪性新闻会影响社会判断,而不考虑媒体可信度的感知。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):280-291. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa164.
9
Mobile knowledge and the media: The movement of scientific information in the context of environmental controversy.移动知识与媒体:环境争议背景下的科学信息流动
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Aug;21(6):705-23. doi: 10.1177/0963662510389977. Epub 2010 Dec 5.
10
Trusting Social Media as a Source of Health Information: Online Surveys Comparing the United States, Korea, and Hong Kong.将社交媒体作为健康信息来源的信任度:比较美国、韩国和中国香港地区的在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 14;18(3):e25. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4193.

引用本文的文献

1
A new dimension of simplified science communication: the easiness effect of science popularization in animated video abstracts.简化科学传播的新维度:动画视频摘要中科学普及的易懂性效应。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1584695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584695. eCollection 2025.
2
Integrating regression and multiobjective optimization techniques to analyze scientific perception.整合回归与多目标优化技术以分析科学认知。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 9;15(1):4819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89065-2.
3
The trap of a closed fist : Is democracy capable of preventing a global ecological catastrophe?
紧握拳头的陷阱:民主能否防止全球生态灾难?
EMBO Rep. 2025 Jan;26(1):5-8. doi: 10.1038/s44319-024-00341-0. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
4
Performing publics of science in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in Austria, Bolivia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, and Portugal.新冠疫情期间的科学表演公众:奥地利、玻利维亚、德国、意大利、墨西哥和葡萄牙的一项定性研究
Public Underst Sci. 2024 May;33(4):466-482. doi: 10.1177/09636625231220219. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
Effects of Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography on Cancer Information Overload, Perceived Scientists' Credibility, and Perceived Journalists' Credibility.关于乳房 X 光摄影术的相互矛盾的信息对癌症信息过载、感知科学家可信度和感知记者可信度的影响。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2481-2490. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2077163. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
Exploring the relationships of citizens' scientific interest and self-understanding to their learning enjoyment and self-efficacy in science.探究公民的科学兴趣和自我认知与他们在科学学习中的乐趣和自我效能感之间的关系。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Feb 17:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02785-w.
7
Trusting scientific experts in an online world.在网络世界中信任科学专家。
Synthese. 2022;200(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03592-3. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
Learning about climate politics during COP 21: Explaining a diminishing knowledge gap.学习《巴黎协定》第 21 次缔约方会议上的气候政治:解释知识差距缩小的原因。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Jul;31(5):617-633. doi: 10.1177/09636625211068635. Epub 2022 Jan 30.
9
Scientific Literacy in Communicating Science and Socio-Scientific Issues: Prospects and Challenges.科学传播与社会科学问题中的科学素养:前景与挑战。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 1;12:758000. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758000. eCollection 2021.
10
Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Computerized Cognitive Training in the General Population.普通人群对计算机化认知训练的态度和信念
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00503. eCollection 2020.