Hg Beurskens Carien, Al Burgers-Bots Ingrid, W Kroon Dineke, Ab Oostendorp Rob
Department of Physiotherapy, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Physiotherapy "Vrije Universiteit" Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2004;7(1):35-9. doi: 10.1298/jjpta.7.35.
A variety of physiotherapeutic approaches have been tried out during the past 25 years to alleviate the plight of patients with peripheral facial nerve paresis. The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with facial nerve paresis. Trials were identified by computerised searches of biomedical databases, reference lists, and by contacting investigators. Selection criteria were randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy for the improvement of sequelae of facial nerve paresis, comparing the treatment with either another intervention or no intervention. Two reviewers independently assessed the trials using the PEDro scale. Two physiotherapy randomised controlled studies were identified. Interventions used for treatment of patients with facial nerve paresis in the included studies were relaxation, biofeedback and exercise therapy. Neither of the two randomised controlled studies showed scientific evidence of a physiotherapeutic approach in comparison with a control group. Both studies described benefits of the interventions. Further randomised controlled studies are required to determine the effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with facial nerve paresis.
在过去25年里,人们尝试了多种物理治疗方法来缓解周围性面神经麻痹患者的困境。本综述的目的是评估物理治疗对面神经麻痹患者的有效性。通过对生物医学数据库、参考文献列表进行计算机检索以及联系研究者来确定试验。选择标准为针对改善面神经麻痹后遗症的物理治疗随机对照试验,将该治疗与另一种干预措施或不进行干预进行比较。两名评价者使用PEDro量表独立评估试验。确定了两项物理治疗随机对照研究。纳入研究中用于治疗面神经麻痹患者的干预措施为放松、生物反馈和运动疗法。两项随机对照研究均未显示与对照组相比物理治疗方法具有科学依据。两项研究均描述了干预措施的益处。需要进一步的随机对照研究来确定物理治疗对面神经麻痹患者的有效性。