Whitehead Todd P, Havel Christopher, Metayer Catherine, Benowitz Neal L, Jacob Peyton
†School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, 1995 University Avenue, Berkeley, California 94704, United States.
‡School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco General Hospital Campus, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143, United States.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2015 May 18;28(5):1007-14. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5b00040. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Smokeless tobacco products, such as moist snuff or chewing tobacco, contain many of the same carcinogens as tobacco smoke; however, the impact on children of indirect exposure to tobacco constituents via parental smokeless tobacco use is unknown. As part of the California Childhood Leukemia Study, dust samples were collected from 6 homes occupied by smokeless tobacco users, 6 homes occupied by active smokers, and 20 tobacco-free homes. To assess children's potential for exposure to tobacco constituents, vacuum-dust concentrations of five tobacco-specific nitrosamines, including N'-nitrosonornicotine [NNN] and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone [NNK], as well as six tobacco alkaloids, including nicotine and myosmine, were quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). We used generalized estimating equations derived from a multivariable marginal model to compare levels of tobacco constituents between groups, after adjusting for a history of parental smoking, income, home construction date, and mother's age and race/ethnicity. The ratio of myosmine/nicotine was used as a novel indicator of the source of tobacco contamination, distinguishing between smokeless tobacco products and tobacco smoke. Median dust concentrations of NNN and NNK were significantly greater in homes with smokeless tobacco users compared to tobacco-free homes. In multivariable models, concentrations of NNN and NNK were 4.8- and 6.9-fold higher, respectively, in homes with smokeless tobacco users compared to tobacco-free homes. Median myosmine/nicotine ratios were lower in homes with smokeless tobacco users (1.8%) compared to homes of active smokers (7.7%), confirming that cigarette smoke was not the predominant source of tobacco constituents in homes with smokeless tobacco users. Children living with smokeless tobacco users may be exposed to carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines via contact with contaminated dust and household surfaces.
无烟烟草制品,如湿鼻烟或嚼烟,含有许多与烟草烟雾中相同的致癌物;然而,父母使用无烟烟草导致儿童间接接触烟草成分的影响尚不清楚。作为加利福尼亚儿童白血病研究的一部分,从6户有无烟烟草使用者的家庭、6户有现吸烟者的家庭和20户无烟家庭中采集了灰尘样本。为了评估儿童接触烟草成分的可能性,通过液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)对五种烟草特异性亚硝胺(包括N'-亚硝基降烟碱[NNN]和4-(甲基亚硝胺基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁酮[NNK])以及六种烟草生物碱(包括尼古丁和麦斯明)的真空灰尘浓度进行了定量。在调整了父母吸烟史、收入、房屋建造日期以及母亲的年龄和种族/族裔后,我们使用了从多变量边际模型推导的广义估计方程来比较各组之间的烟草成分水平。麦斯明/尼古丁的比值被用作区分无烟烟草制品和烟草烟雾的烟草污染来源的新指标。与无烟家庭相比,有无烟烟草使用者家庭中NNN和NNK的灰尘浓度中位数显著更高。在多变量模型中,与无烟家庭相比,有无烟烟草使用者家庭中NNN和NNK的浓度分别高出4.8倍和6.9倍。与现吸烟者家庭(7.7%)相比,有无烟烟草使用者家庭中麦斯明/尼古丁比值的中位数较低(1.8%),这证实了在有无烟烟草使用者的家庭中,香烟烟雾不是烟草成分的主要来源。与无烟烟草使用者生活在一起的儿童可能通过接触受污染的灰尘和家庭表面而接触到致癌性烟草特异性亚硝胺