• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Linking acknowledgement to action: closing the loop on non-urgent, clinically significant test results in the electronic health record.将确认与行动联系起来:在电子健康记录中对非紧急但具有临床意义的检查结果进行闭环管理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):905-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv007. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
2
Semiautomated System for Nonurgent, Clinically Significant Pathology Results.非紧急、具有临床意义的病理学结果半自动系统。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):411-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1654700. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?将非紧急但具有临床意义的放射学警报整合到电子健康记录中是否会影响闭环通信和后续跟进?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):333-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv105. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
4
Satisfaction with electronic health records is associated with job satisfaction among primary care physicians.对电子健康记录的满意度与基层医疗医生的工作满意度相关。
Inform Prim Care. 2013;21(1):18-20. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v21i1.27.
5
Evaluating primary care providers' views on survivorship care plans generated by an electronic health record system.评估初级保健提供者对电子健康记录系统生成的生存护理计划的看法。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):e329-35. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.003335. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
The good, the bad and the early adopters: providers' attitudes about a common, commercial EHR.好的、坏的和早期采用者:提供者对常见商业电子健康记录的态度。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Feb;20(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/jep.12076. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: a study of practitioners' perspectives.从门诊电子病历系统过渡:从业者视角的研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):401-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000333. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
8
Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.基层医疗保健医生对采用电子病历的态度:使用临床采用框架的系统评价和证据综合。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0703-x.
9
Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review.电子健康记录对初级保健医生情境意识的支持:一项荟萃叙述性综述。
Hum Factors. 2023 Mar;65(2):237-259. doi: 10.1177/00187208211014300. Epub 2021 May 25.
10
We need to talk: Primary care provider communication at discharge in the era of a shared electronic medical record.我们需要探讨:共享电子病历时代出院时初级医疗服务提供者的沟通问题。
J Hosp Med. 2015 May;10(5):307-10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2336. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis: an integrative review.改善癌症及时诊断的干预措施:一项综合综述。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 18;12(2):153-162. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0113. eCollection 2025 May 1.
2
Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study.肿瘤环境中关键患者报告结局指标的管理:系统开发与回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Nov 3;10(11):e38483. doi: 10.2196/38483.
3
Does health information technology improve acknowledgement of radiology results for discharged Emergency Department patients? A before and after study.健康信息技术是否能提高已出院的急诊科患者对放射科结果的知晓率?一项前后对照研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01135-9.
4
The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.健康信息技术对检验结果管理和随访的影响——系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):678-688. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz032.
5
The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.自动化通知对出院时待处理可行动测试的随访的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1043-1051. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4393-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Randomized Trial of Reducing Ambulatory Malpractice and Safety Risk: Results of the Massachusetts PROMISES Project.降低门诊医疗事故及安全风险的随机试验:马萨诸塞州PROMISES项目的结果
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):797-805. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000759.
7
Does integrating nonurgent, clinically significant radiology alerts within the electronic health record impact closed-loop communication and follow-up?将非紧急但具有临床意义的放射学警报整合到电子健康记录中是否会影响闭环通信和后续跟进?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):333-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv105. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated critical test result notification system: architecture, design, and assessment of provider satisfaction.自动危急检验结果通知系统:架构、设计及对医护人员满意度的评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov;203(5):W491-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13063.
2
Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.警报通知系统对关键检验结果闭环沟通的四年影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Nov;203(5):933-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13064.
3
Lessons learned from the introduction of an electronic safety net to enhance test result management in an Australian mothers' hospital.从引入电子安全网以加强澳大利亚一家妇产医院的检测结果管理中吸取的经验教训。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002466. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
4
An initiative to improve the management of clinically significant test results in a large health care network.一项旨在改善大型医疗保健网络中具有临床意义的检测结果管理的倡议。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Nov;39(11):517-27. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39068-0.
5
Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.出院待检检验结果自动化电子邮件通知系统的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):473-80. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002030. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
6
Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial.自动化警报对出院后微生物学结果随访的影响:一项集群随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1243-50. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-1986-8. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
7
Design and implementation of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge.待出院检验结果自动电子邮件通知系统的设计与实现。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):523-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000615. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
8
The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review.住院患者漏检结果的安全性影响:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Feb;20(2):194-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.044339. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
9
Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results.关于传达异常检测结果的政策的八项建议。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 May;36(5):226-32. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(10)36037-5.
10
Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain?电子病历中异常实验室检查结果的通知:是否仍存在任何安全问题?
Am J Med. 2010 Mar;123(3):238-44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.07.027.

将确认与行动联系起来:在电子健康记录中对非紧急但具有临床意义的检查结果进行闭环管理。

Linking acknowledgement to action: closing the loop on non-urgent, clinically significant test results in the electronic health record.

作者信息

Dalal Anuj K, Pesterev Bailey M, Eibensteiner Katyuska, Newmark Lisa P, Samal Lipika, Rothschild Jeffrey M

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):905-8. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv007. Epub 2015 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocv007
PMID:25796594
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6283058/
Abstract

Failure to follow-up nonurgent, clinically significant test results (CSTRs) is an ambulatory patient safety concern. Tools within electronic health records (EHRs) may facilitate test result acknowledgment, but their utility with regard to nonurgent CSTRs is unclear. We measured use of an acknowledgment tool by 146 primary care physicians (PCPs) at 13 network-affiliated practices that use the same EHR. We then surveyed PCPs to assess use of, satisfaction with, and desired enhancements to the acknowledgment tool. The rate of acknowledgment of non-urgent CSTRs by PCPs was 78%. Of 73 survey respondents, 72 reported taking one or more actions after reviewing a CSTR; fewer (40-75%) reported that using the acknowledgment tool was helpful for a specific purpose. Forty-six (64%) were satisfied with the tool. Both satisfied and nonsatisfied PCPs reported that enhancements linking acknowledgment to routine actions would be useful. EHR vendors should consider enhancements to acknowledgment functionality to ensure follow-up of nonurgent CSTRs.

摘要

未能对非紧急但具有临床意义的检查结果(CSTRs)进行随访是门诊患者安全的一个问题。电子健康记录(EHRs)中的工具可能有助于确认检查结果,但它们在非紧急CSTRs方面的效用尚不清楚。我们在13个使用相同EHR的网络附属医疗机构中,对146名初级保健医生(PCPs)使用确认工具的情况进行了测量。然后,我们对PCPs进行了调查,以评估确认工具的使用情况、满意度以及期望的改进之处。PCPs对非紧急CSTRs的确认率为78%。在73名调查受访者中,72人报告在查看CSTR后采取了一项或多项行动;较少比例(40%-75%)的人报告使用确认工具对特定目的有帮助。46人(64%)对该工具感到满意。满意和不满意的PCPs都报告说,将确认与常规行动联系起来的改进会很有用。EHR供应商应考虑增强确认功能,以确保对非紧急CSTRs进行随访。