• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Possibilities for the improvement of the quality of knowledge and their evaluation in the course of studying clinical medicine].

作者信息

Tetenev F F, Bodrova T N, Ageeva T S, Karzilov A I, Kalinina O V

出版信息

Klin Med (Mosk). 2014;92(11):75-8.

PMID:25796952
Abstract

The authors consider objective and subjective factors exerting negative influence on the quality of knowledge of physicians. The generally accepted methods for its evaluation (testing and rating-systems) have limitations. Testing reflects the level of knowledge with respect to the mode of thinking of its designer while rating mostly characterizes diligence of the trainee. It is proposed to improve the quality of knowledge by teaching the theory of diagnostics and to evaluate the amount of knowledge from the contents of the descriptive part of the medical history. The quality of knowledge can be assessed based on the contents of professional comments on the clinical picture described in the model case history.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Possibilities for the improvement of the quality of knowledge and their evaluation in the course of studying clinical medicine].
Klin Med (Mosk). 2014;92(11):75-8.
2
The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development.专业能力评估:理论发展的基石。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Dec;24(6):703-19. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Evaluating educational interventions in emergency medicine.评估急诊医学中的教育干预措施。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;19(12):1442-53. doi: 10.1111/acem.12022.
4
The influence of introducing an exam during the basic course in clinical skills on the learning success.
Med Teach. 2009 Jul;31(7):672-3.
5
Team OSCEs: evaluation methodology or educational encounter?团队客观结构化临床考试:评估方法还是教育体验?
Med Educ. 2008 Nov;42(11):1129-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03220.x.
6
'The Game': student 'teaching' objective structured clinical examinations in South Africa.“游戏”:南非学生“教学”客观结构化临床考试
Med Educ. 2012 May;46(5):507-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04248.x.
7
Developing a support system for teaching and assessing clinical competence.开发一个用于教学和评估临床能力的支持系统。
J Biocommun. 1992;19(4):19-25.
8
[Entrustable professional activities: a new proposal for the evaluation of the medical competencies].[可托付专业活动:医学能力评估的新提议]
Rev Med Chil. 2018 Sep;146(9):1064-1069. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000901064.
9
[Methods in the evaluation of medical students].[医学生评估方法]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Jan 4;161(1):22-6.
10
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in the clinical clerkship: an overview.临床实习中的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)概述
S D J Med. 1997 May;50(5):153-6.