Guo Chengcheng, Hao Chuncheng, Shao RuPing, Fang Bingliang, Correa Arlene M, Hofstetter Wayne L, Roth Jack A, Behrens Carmen, Kalhor Neda, Wistuba Ignacio I, Swisher Stephen G, Pataer Apar
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Current address: Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Oncotarget. 2015 May 10;6(13):11114-24. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3573.
We have demonstrated that RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) and its downstream protein p-eIF2α are independent prognostic markers for overall survival in lung cancer. In the current study, we further investigate the interaction between PKR and AMPK in lung tumor tissue and cancer cell lines. We examined PKR protein expression in 55 frozen primary lung tumor tissues by Western blotting and analyzed the association between PKR expression and expression of 139 proteins on tissue samples examined previously by Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) from the same 55 patients. We observed that biomarkers were either positively (phosphorylated AMP-activated kinase(T172) [p-AMPK]) or negatively (insulin receptor substrate 1, meiotic recombination 11, ATR interacting protein, telomerase, checkpoint kinase 1, and cyclin E1) correlated with PKR. We further confirmed that induction of PKR with expression vectors in lung cancer cells causes activation of the AMPK protein independent of the LKB1, TAK1, and CaMKKβ pathway. We found that PKR causes nutrient depletion, which increases AMP levels and decreases ATP levels, causing AMPK phosphorylation. We further demonstrated that inhibiting AMPK expression with compound C or siRNA enhanced PKR-mediated cell death. We next explored the combination of PKR and p-AMPK expression in NSCLC patients and observed that expression of p-AMPK predicted a poor outcome for adenocarcinoma patients with high PKR expression and a better prognosis for those with low PKR expression. These findings were consistent with our in vitro results. AMPK might rescue cells facing metabolic stresses, such as ATP depletion caused by PKR. Our data indicate that PKR causes nutrient depletion, which induces the phosphorylation of AMPK. AMPK might act as a protective response to metabolic stresses, such as nutrient deprivation.
我们已经证明,RNA依赖性蛋白激酶(PKR)及其下游蛋白p-eIF2α是肺癌总生存期的独立预后标志物。在本研究中,我们进一步研究了PKR与AMPK在肺肿瘤组织和癌细胞系中的相互作用。我们通过蛋白质免疫印迹法检测了55例冷冻原发性肺肿瘤组织中PKR蛋白的表达,并分析了PKR表达与来自同一55例患者的组织样本中139种蛋白质表达之间的关联,这些组织样本先前通过反相蛋白质阵列(RPPA)进行了检测。我们观察到生物标志物与PKR呈正相关(磷酸化的AMP激活激酶(T172)[p-AMPK])或负相关(胰岛素受体底物1、减数分裂重组11、ATR相互作用蛋白、端粒酶、检查点激酶1和细胞周期蛋白E1)。我们进一步证实,在肺癌细胞中用表达载体诱导PKR会导致AMPK蛋白的激活,且不依赖于LKB1、TAK1和CaMKKβ途径。我们发现PKR会导致营养物质消耗,从而增加AMP水平并降低ATP水平,进而导致AMPK磷酸化。我们进一步证明,用化合物C或小干扰RNA抑制AMPK表达可增强PKR介导的细胞死亡。接下来,我们探讨了非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中PKR和p-AMPK表达的联合情况,观察到p-AMPK的表达预测PKR高表达的腺癌患者预后较差,而PKR低表达的患者预后较好。这些发现与我们的体外实验结果一致。AMPK可能挽救面临代谢应激的细胞,例如由PKR引起的ATP消耗。我们的数据表明,PKR导致营养物质消耗,进而诱导AMPK磷酸化。AMPK可能作为对代谢应激(如营养剥夺)的一种保护反应。