• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus modified Barker Vacuum Pack as temporary abdominal closure technique for Open Abdomen management: a four-year experience.负压伤口治疗与改良巴克真空包装作为开放性腹部处理的临时腹部闭合技术:四年经验
BMC Surg. 2017 Jul 21;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0281-3.
2
Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure with Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Better Outcomes than Vacuum-Assisted Wound Closure Alone: A Comparative Study.网片介导筋膜牵张的真空辅助伤口闭合优于单纯真空辅助伤口闭合:一项比较研究。
World J Surg. 2018 Jun;42(6):1679-1686. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4354-3.
3
Management of Open Abdomen After Trauma Laparotomy: A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Fascial Traction and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Systems.创伤剖腹术后开放性腹部的处理:动态筋膜牵引与负压伤口治疗系统的比较分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Dec;43(12):3044-3050. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05166-w.
4
[Treatment of open abdomen in patients with abdominal sepsis using the vacuum pack system].[使用负压封闭引流系统治疗腹部脓毒症患者的开放性腹腔]
Cir Cir. 2010 Jul-Aug;78(4):322-6.
5
Negative-pressure wound therapy for critically ill adults with open abdominal wounds: a systematic review.负压伤口疗法治疗伴有开放性腹部伤口的危重症成人患者:系统评价。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Sep;73(3):629-39. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31825c130e.
6
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在接受开放腹部技术治疗的患者中的有效性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):575-84. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001126.
7
Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.负压伤口治疗联合动态筋膜缝合有助于脓毒症患者开放性腹部伤口的延迟闭合。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):735-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3251-6. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
8
Open abdomen with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction in patients with complicated diffuse secondary peritonitis: A single-center 8-year experience.复杂弥漫性继发性腹膜炎患者采用开放式腹腔联合负压封闭引流及补片介导的筋膜牵引术:单中心8年经验
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6):1100-1105. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001452.
9
Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients.258例创伤、普通外科及血管外科患者应用真空包装临时腹部伤口闭合术的经验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):784-92; discussion 792-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.039. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
10
Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction for open abdomen therapy - a systematic review.真空辅助伤口闭合与网状物介导的筋膜牵引用于开放性腹部治疗——一项系统评价
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(2):139-145. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2017.0023. Epub 2017 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporary abdominal closure in trauma surgery: a comparative cohort study between open abdomen techniques with negative pressure therapy.创伤手术中的临时腹部闭合:负压治疗开放性腹部技术之间的比较队列研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 May 16;410(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03725-5.
2
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy: A Novel Approach for Terminal Ileum Anastomosis Success.负压伤口治疗:一种促进回肠末端吻合成功的新方法。
Am J Case Rep. 2025 Jan 4;26:e945745. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.945745.
3
Open Abdominal Management for Damage Control in Liver Transplantation: A Single-center Experience.肝移植损伤控制中的开放性腹部管理:单中心经验
Transplant Direct. 2024 Aug 19;10(9):e1702. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001702. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Severe Acute Pancreatitis Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System: Influence of Laboratory Markers.负压伤口治疗系统治疗重症急性胰腺炎:实验室指标的影响
J Clin Med. 2023 May 28;12(11):3721. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113721.
5
Negative pressure wound therapy for managing the open abdomen in non-trauma patients.负压伤口疗法在非创伤患者中用于管理开放性腹部。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 6;5(5):CD013710. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013710.pub2.
6
Managing the Open Abdomen in Damage Control Surgery: Should Skin-Only Closure be Abandoned?损伤控制手术中开放性腹腔的处理:仅行皮肤缝合是否应被摒弃?
Cureus. 2021 Jun 7;13(6):e15489. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15489. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Predictive factors of mortality in open abdomen for abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study on 113 patients.开放性腹部治疗腹腔感染患者死亡率的预测因素:113 例回顾性队列研究。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1975-1982. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01012-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Device Applied for Two-stage Closure of Enterocutaneous Fistula.开放式腹腔负压装置应用于肠造口瘘的二期闭合
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Feb 1;9(2):e3369. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003369. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Early Initiation of a Standardized Open Abdomen Treatment With Vacuum Assisted Mesh-Mediated Fascial Traction Achieves Best Results.早期采用真空辅助网片介导的筋膜牵引进行标准化开放性腹部治疗可取得最佳效果。
Front Surg. 2021 Feb 9;7:606539. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.606539. eCollection 2020.
10
Technique Advances in Enteroatmospheric Fistula Isolation After Open Abdomen: A Review and Outlook.开腹术后肠-腹壁瘘隔离的技术进展:综述与展望
Front Surg. 2021 Jan 20;7:559443. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.559443. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在接受开放腹部技术治疗的患者中的有效性如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Sep;81(3):575-84. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001126.
2
Amended Classification of the Open Abdomen.开放性腹部的修订分类
Scand J Surg. 2016 Mar;105(1):5-10. doi: 10.1177/1457496916631853. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Techniques for Abdominal Wall Closure after Damage Control Laparotomy: From Temporary Abdominal Closure to Early/Delayed Fascial Closure-A Review.损伤控制剖腹术后腹壁关闭技术:从临时腹壁关闭到早期/延迟筋膜关闭——综述
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:2073260. doi: 10.1155/2016/2073260. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
4
Active Negative Pressure Peritoneal Therapy After Abbreviated Laparotomy: The Intraperitoneal Vacuum Randomized Controlled Trial.简化剖腹术后的主动负压腹膜治疗:腹腔内真空随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):38-46. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001095.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.非创伤患者开放性腹部及临时腹部关闭技术的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2015 Apr;39(4):912-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6.
6
An introduction of Tertiary Peritonitis.三发性腹膜炎简介。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014 Apr;7(2):121-3. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.130883.
7
Management of the open abdomen.开放性腹部的处理。
Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Feb;94(1):131-53. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.10.010.
8
Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture.负压伤口治疗联合动态筋膜缝合有助于脓毒症患者开放性腹部伤口的延迟闭合。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):735-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3251-6. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
9
Open abdomen management: a review of its history and a proposed management algorithm.开放性腹部管理:历史回顾与管理算法建议。
Med Sci Monit. 2013 Jul 3;19:524-33. doi: 10.12659/MSM.883966.
10
Management of the open abdomen: a national study of clinical outcome and safety of negative pressure wound therapy.开放式腹部管理:负压伤口疗法的临床结局和安全性的全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828b8bc8.

负压伤口治疗与改良巴克真空包装作为开放性腹部处理的临时腹部闭合技术:四年经验

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus modified Barker Vacuum Pack as temporary abdominal closure technique for Open Abdomen management: a four-year experience.

作者信息

Montori Giulia, Allievi Niccolò, Coccolini Federico, Solaini Leonardo, Campanati Luca, Ceresoli Marco, Fugazzola Paola, Manfredi Roberto, Magnone Stefano, Tomasoni Matteo, Ansaloni Luca

机构信息

Unit of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, P.zza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2017 Jul 21;17(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0281-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-017-0281-3
PMID:28732537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5521106/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We reviewed our experience with patients presenting with trauma and peritonitis who underwent an open abdomen (OA) procedure, and compared outcomes between Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) and a modified Barker Vacuum Pack (mBVP) technique.

METHODS

In this descriptive study, we retrospectively analyzed data regarding all patients who underwent OA for intra-abdominal sepsis or abdominal trauma at our Centre from January 2012 to December 2015. Demographic data, co-morbidities, indications to surgery, intra-operative details and Björck classification grade were considered. Outcomes included were: time to closure in days, fascial closure rates, ICU and hospital stay, in-hospital and overall mortality, and entero-atmospheric fistula rate.

RESULTS

A total of 83 cases were considered. Mean closure time was 6 days versus 6.5 days (p = 0.71) in NPWT and mBVP groups, respectively; the fascial closure rate was 75.4% versus 93.8% (p = 0.10). At multivariate analysis, in-hospital and overall mortality were significantly higher within the mBVP, as compared to NPWT (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 13.1, p = 0.02 - OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 14.1, p = 0.01). Entero-atmospheric fistula rate was 2.6% in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NPWT as a temporary abdominal closure technique, as compared to mBVP, appears to be associated with better outcomes in terms of mortality.

摘要

背景

我们回顾了接受开放腹腔(OA)手术的创伤合并腹膜炎患者的治疗经验,并比较了负压伤口治疗(NPWT)和改良巴克真空包装(mBVP)技术的治疗效果。

方法

在这项描述性研究中,我们回顾性分析了2012年1月至2015年12月在本中心因腹腔内感染或腹部创伤接受OA手术的所有患者的数据。考虑了人口统计学数据、合并症、手术指征、术中细节和比约克分类等级。纳入的治疗效果包括:闭合天数、筋膜闭合率、重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间、住院期间和总体死亡率以及肠-气瘘发生率。

结果

共纳入83例病例。NPWT组和mBVP组的平均闭合时间分别为6天和6.5天(p = 0.71);筋膜闭合率分别为75.4%和93.8%(p = 0.10)。多因素分析显示,与NPWT相比,mBVP组的住院期间和总体死亡率显著更高(比值比[OR] 3.8,95%置信区间[CI] 1.1至13.1,p = 0.02 - OR 4.2,95% CI 1.2至14.1,p = 0.01)。两组的肠-气瘘发生率均为2.6%。

结论

与mBVP相比,NPWT作为一种临时的腹部闭合技术,在死亡率方面似乎具有更好的治疗效果。