Milton Constance L
Associate Dean and Professor of Nursing, Azusa Pacific University
Nurs Sci Q. 2015 Apr;28(2):112-4. doi: 10.1177/0894318415571607.
The politics of academia involve intricate human relationships that are political in nature as nurse leaders and scholars struggle to advance nursing science with complex leading-following situations. This article begins a dialogue of considering potential meanings for what it means to be political within competing interest groups in academia, and within the discipline of nursing. What is most important in the struggle for identity and what possibilities surface when potential competing interests in academia collide? The ethical tenets of humanbecoming and the leading-following model are used to illustrate issues surrounding academic integrity and possibilities for the advancement of nursing scholarship in future generations.
学术界的政治涉及复杂的人际关系，这些关系本质上具有政治性，因为护理领导者和学者们在复杂的领导-追随情境中努力推动护理科学发展。本文开启了一场对话，探讨在学术界相互竞争的利益集团以及护理学科领域内，“具有政治性”可能意味着什么。在身份认同的斗争中，什么是最重要的？当学术界潜在的相互竞争利益发生冲突时，会出现哪些可能性？“人类生成”的伦理原则和领导-追随模式被用来阐释围绕学术诚信的问题以及未来几代护理学术发展的可能性。
