• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在范围之内自在吗?对数值不确定范围的外行解读

At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges.

作者信息

Dieckmann Nathan F, Peters Ellen, Gregory Robin

机构信息

School of Nursing & Department of Public Health & Preventative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Decision Research, Eugene, OR, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2015 Jul;35(7):1281-95. doi: 10.1111/risa.12358. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12358
PMID:25808952
Abstract

Numerical uncertainty ranges are often used to convey the precision of a forecast. In three studies, we examined how users perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges and test specific hypotheses about the display characteristics that affect these perceptions. We discuss five primary conclusions from these studies: (1) substantial variation exists in how people perceive the distribution underlying numerical ranges; (2) distributional perceptions appear similar whether the uncertain variable is a probability or an outcome; (3) the variation in distributional perceptions is due in part to individual differences in numeracy, with more numerate individuals more likely to perceive the distribution as roughly normal; (4) the variation is also due in part to the presence versus absence of common cues used to convey the correct interpretation (e.g., including a best estimate increases perceptions that the distribution is roughly normal); and (5) simple graphical representations can decrease the variance in distributional perceptions. These results point toward significant opportunities to improve uncertainty communication in climate change and other domains.

摘要

数值不确定性范围常被用于传达预测的精度。在三项研究中,我们考察了用户如何理解数值范围背后的分布情况,并检验了关于影响这些理解的显示特征的具体假设。我们讨论了这些研究得出的五个主要结论:(1)人们对数值范围背后分布的理解存在很大差异;(2)无论不确定变量是概率还是结果,分布理解似乎都相似;(3)分布理解的差异部分归因于算术能力的个体差异,算术能力较强的个体更有可能将分布理解为大致呈正态分布;(4)差异还部分归因于用于传达正确解释的常见线索的有无(例如,包含最佳估计会增加认为分布大致呈正态分布的看法);(5)简单的图形表示可以减少分布理解中的差异。这些结果表明在气候变化及其他领域改善不确定性沟通存在重大机遇。

相似文献

1
At Home on the Range? Lay Interpretations of Numerical Uncertainty Ranges.在范围之内自在吗?对数值不确定范围的外行解读
Risk Anal. 2015 Jul;35(7):1281-95. doi: 10.1111/risa.12358. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
2
Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning.看到你想看的:不精确的不确定性范围如何增强动机推理。
Risk Anal. 2017 Mar;37(3):471-486. doi: 10.1111/risa.12639. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
The use of narrative evidence and explicit likelihood by decisionmakers varying in numeracy.不同算术能力的决策者对叙述性证据和明确可能性的运用。
Risk Anal. 2009 Oct;29(10):1473-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01279.x. Epub 2009 Aug 10.
4
The effects of presenting imprecise probabilities in intelligence forecasts.呈现不精确概率对情报预测的影响。
Risk Anal. 2010 Jun;30(6):987-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01384.x. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
5
Deliberative disjunction: expert and public understanding of outcome uncertainty.审议性分歧:专家和公众对结果不确定性的理解。
Risk Anal. 2012 Dec;32(12):2071-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01825.x. Epub 2012 May 7.
6
Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.改善政府间气候变化专门委员会报告中不确定性信息的传达。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02284.x. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
7
The role of numeracy in moderating the influence of statistics in climate change messages.在气候变化信息中,数学素养对统计学影响的调节作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Oct;22(7):785-98. doi: 10.1177/0963662513482268. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
8
Perceiving others' perceptions of risk: still a task for Sisyphus.感知他人对风险的认知:仍是西西弗斯的任务。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1128:121-37. doi: 10.1196/annals.1399.013.
9
Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches.测量不确定性的重要性:替代方法的研究与比较
Risk Anal. 2006 Oct;26(5):1349-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00806.x.
10
Imprecision and Preferences in Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities in Health: a Systematic Review.健康领域中言语概率解释的不精确性和偏好:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3820-3829. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07050-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Laypersons' understanding of statistical concepts commonly used in prescription drug promotion: A review of the research literature.非专业人士对处方药促销中常用统计概念的理解:研究文献综述。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Dec;20(12 Pt A):1075-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.092. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
An Exploratory Study on the Impacts of Individual Skills and Health Information Exposure on Perceptions of Cancer Control and Expert Competence.个体技能和健康信息暴露对癌症控制和专家能力认知影响的探索性研究
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1584-1591. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02303-x. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3
Dimensions of uncertainty communication: What is conveyed by verbal terms and numeric ranges.
不确定性沟通的维度:言语表述和数值范围所传达的内容。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Nov 12:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03985-0.
4
Relating Ocean Condition Forecasts to the Process of End-User Decision Making: A Case Study of the Oregon Commercial Fishing Community.将海洋状况预报与终端用户决策过程相关联:以俄勒冈州商业捕鱼社区为例
Mar Technol Soc J. 2019 Feb;53(1):53-66. doi: 10.4031/mtsj.53.1.1. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
5
Guidance on Communication of Uncertainty in Scientific Assessments.科学评估中不确定性信息传达指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 16;17(1):e05520. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5520. eCollection 2019 Jan.
6
The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers.沟通不确定性对公众对事实和数字的信任的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7672-7683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913678117. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
7
Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science.传达关于事实、数字和科学的不确定性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 May 8;6(5):181870. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181870. eCollection 2019 May.
8
The Role of Type and Source of Uncertainty on the Processing of Climate Models Projections.不确定性的类型和来源对气候模型预测处理的作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 27;9:403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00403. eCollection 2018.