Naghdi S, Ansari N Nakhostin, Yazdanpanah M, Feise R J, Fakhari Z
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Institute of Evidence-Based Chiropractic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25(6):840-5. doi: 10.1111/sms.12447. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the reliability and validity of the Functional Rating Index (FRI) for athletes with low back pain (LBP). In this cross-sectional and prospective cohort study, the validated Persian FRI (PFRI) was tested in 100 athletes with LBP and 50 healthy athletes. From the athletes with LBP, data were recollected among 50 athletes with a 7-day interval to examine test-retest reliability. The content validity was excellent, and the athletes with LBP responded to all items with no floor or ceiling effects. The discriminative validity was supported by a statistically significant difference in PFRI total scores between the athletes with LBP and healthy athletes. The concurrent criterion validity was good (rho = 0.72). The construct, convergent validity was good (r = 0.83). The internal consistency reliability estimate was high (Cronbach's α = 0.90). Factor analysis demonstrated a single-factor structure with an explained variance of 52.22%. The test-retest reliability was excellent, indicated by an ICC(agreement) of 0.97, and the agreement observed in the Bland and Altman plot demonstrated no systematic bias. It is concluded that the PFRI has excellent psychometric properties for assessing athletes with LBP.
本研究的目的是确定功能评定指数(FRI)对腰痛(LBP)运动员的可靠性和有效性。在这项横断面前瞻性队列研究中,对100名LBP运动员和50名健康运动员进行了经过验证的波斯语FRI(PFRI)测试。对于LBP运动员,在50名运动员中每隔7天收集一次数据,以检验重测信度。内容效度极佳,LBP运动员对所有项目均有反应,无地板效应或天花板效应。LBP运动员与健康运动员之间PFRI总分存在统计学显著差异,支持了区分效度。同时效度良好(rho = 0.72)。结构效度、收敛效度良好(r = 0.83)。内部一致性信度估计值较高(Cronbach's α = 0.90)。因子分析显示为单因素结构,解释方差为52.22%。重测信度极佳,组内相关系数(ICC)(一致性)为0.97,Bland-Altman图中观察到的一致性表明无系统偏差。得出结论,PFRI在评估LBP运动员方面具有出色的心理测量特性。