Tan Andy S L, Bigman Cabral A, Mello Susan, Sanders-Jackson Ashley
Population Sciences Division, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Community Based Research, Boston, USA Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Department of Communication, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 26;5(3):e007134. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007134.
E-cigarettes are frequently advertised and portrayed in the media as less harmful compared with regular cigarettes. Earlier surveys reported public perceptions of harms to people using e-cigarettes; however, public perceptions of harms from exposure to secondhand vapour (SHV) have not been studied. We examined associations between self-reported exposure to e-cigarette advertising, media coverage, and interpersonal discussion and perceived harms of SHV.
Observational study.
National online sample of US adults aged ≥18 years.
1449 US adults (mean age 49.5 years), 51.3% female, 76.6% non-Hispanic Caucasian, 7.5% African-American, 10.0% Hispanic and 5.9% other races.
Perceived harm measures included (1) harmfulness of SHV to one's health, (2) concern about health impact of breathing SHV and (3) comparative harm of SHV versus secondhand smoke (SHS). Predictors were (1) self-reported frequency of exposure to e-cigarette advertising, media coverage and interpersonal discussion (close friends or family) and (2) perceived valence of exposure from each source. Covariates were demographic characteristics, cigarette smoking status and e-cigarette use, and were weighted to the general US adult population.
More frequent interpersonal discussion was associated with lower perceived harmfulness of SHV to one's health and lower perceived comparative harm of SHV versus SHS. Frequency of e-cigarette ad and other media exposure were not significant predictors. Perceived negative valence of ad exposure and interpersonal discussion (vs no exposure) was associated with higher perceived harm across all three outcomes, while negative valence of media coverage was associated with higher concern about health impact of breathing SHV. Perceived positive valence (vs no exposure) of interpersonal discussion was associated with lower perceived harm across all three outcomes about health impact of breathing SHV.
Exposure to information about e-cigarettes through advertising, media coverage and interpersonal discussion could play a role in shaping public perceptions of the harmfulness of SHV.
电子烟在媒体上经常被宣传和描绘为比传统香烟危害更小。早期调查报道了公众对使用电子烟者健康危害的认知;然而,公众对接触二手蒸汽(SHV)危害的认知尚未得到研究。我们研究了自我报告的接触电子烟广告、媒体报道和人际讨论与对SHV危害的认知之间的关联。
观察性研究。
美国18岁及以上成年人的全国在线样本。
1449名美国成年人(平均年龄49.5岁),51.3%为女性,76.6%为非西班牙裔白人,7.5%为非裔美国人,10.0%为西班牙裔,5.9%为其他种族。
更频繁的人际讨论与对SHV对自身健康危害的较低认知以及对SHV与二手烟(SHS)相对危害的较低认知相关。电子烟广告和其他媒体接触频率不是显著的预测因素。广告接触和人际讨论的感知负向性(与无接触相比)在所有三个结果中都与更高的感知危害相关,而媒体报道的负向性与对呼吸SHV健康影响的更高担忧相关。人际讨论的感知正向性(与无接触相比)在关于呼吸SHV健康影响的所有三个结果中都与较低的感知危害相关。
通过广告、媒体报道和人际讨论接触电子烟信息可能在塑造公众对SHV危害的认知方面发挥作用。