• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言学习者更看重有结构的意义而不是表面频率。

Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency.

机构信息

Linguistics Program, English Department, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5842-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320525111. Epub 2014 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1320525111
PMID:24706789
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4000832/
Abstract

Although it is widely agreed that learning the syntax of natural languages involves acquiring structure-dependent rules, recent work on acquisition has nevertheless attempted to characterize the outcome of learning primarily in terms of statistical generalizations about surface distributional information. In this paper we investigate whether surface statistical knowledge or structural knowledge of English is used to infer properties of a novel language under conditions of impoverished input. We expose learners to artificial-language patterns that are equally consistent with two possible underlying grammars--one more similar to English in terms of the linear ordering of words, the other more similar on abstract structural grounds. We show that learners' grammatical inferences overwhelmingly favor structural similarity over preservation of superficial order. Importantly, the relevant shared structure can be characterized in terms of a universal preference for isomorphism in the mapping from meanings to utterances. Whereas previous empirical support for this universal has been based entirely on data from cross-linguistic language samples, our results suggest it may reflect a deep property of the human cognitive system--a property that, together with other structure-sensitive principles, constrains the acquisition of linguistic knowledge.

摘要

虽然人们普遍认为学习自然语言的语法涉及到获取依赖于结构的规则,但最近关于习得的研究仍试图主要根据关于表面分布信息的统计概括来描述学习的结果。在本文中,我们研究了在输入匮乏的情况下,是否使用表面统计知识或英语的结构知识来推断一种新语言的属性。我们让学习者接触到与两种可能的基础语法同样一致的人工语言模式——一种在词的线性顺序上与英语更相似,另一种在抽象结构上更相似。我们表明,学习者的语法推断压倒性地倾向于结构相似性,而不是保持表面顺序。重要的是,相关的共享结构可以用从意义到话语映射的同构偏好来描述。虽然以前基于跨语言语言样本的数据完全支持这种普遍性,但我们的结果表明,它可能反映了人类认知系统的一个深层特性——一种与其他结构敏感原则一起限制语言知识习得的特性。

相似文献

1
Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency.语言学习者更看重有结构的意义而不是表面频率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 22;111(16):5842-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320525111. Epub 2014 Mar 31.
2
Learning biases predict a word order universal.学习偏见预测了一种语序普遍性。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):306-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
3
From shared contexts to syntactic categories: the role of distributional information in learning linguistic form-classes.从共享语境到句法范畴:分布信息在学习语言形式类别中的作用。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 Feb;66(1):30-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Harmonic biases in child learners: in support of language universals.儿童学习者中的调和偏差:支持语言普遍性
Cognition. 2015 Jun;139:71-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
5
Semantic Coherence Facilitates Distributional Learning.语义连贯有助于分布学习。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41 Suppl 4:855-884. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12360. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
6
How Grammar Conveys Meaning: Language-Specific Spatial Encoding Patterns and Cross-Language Commonality in Higher-Order Neural Space.语法如何传达意义:高阶神经空间中的语言特异性空间编码模式和跨语言共性。
J Neurosci. 2023 Nov 15;43(46):7831-7841. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0599-23.2023. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
7
Learning structural alternations: What guides learners' generalization?学习结构交替:什么指导学习者的泛化?
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104828. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104828. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
8
The effect of Zipfian frequency variations on category formation in adult artificial language learning.齐普夫频率变化对成人人工语言学习中类别形成的影响。
Lang Learn Dev. 2017;13(4):357-374. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2016.1263571. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
9
Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning.认知偏差、语言共性与基于约束的语法学习。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):392-424. doi: 10.1111/tops.12027. Epub 2013 May 23.
10
Systematicity, but not compositionality: Examining the emergence of linguistic structure in children and adults using iterated learning.系统性而非构成性:使用迭代学习研究儿童和成人语言结构的出现。
Cognition. 2018 Dec;181:160-173. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Lexical Surprisal Shapes the Time Course of Syntactic Structure Building.词汇意外性塑造句法结构构建的时间进程。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Oct 11;5(4):942-980. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00155. eCollection 2024.
2
Language structure reflects biases in pattern learning across domains and modalities.语言结构反映了跨领域和模态的模式学习中的偏差。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Jul;78(7):1303-1320. doi: 10.1177/17470218241282404. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
3
Undercompression errors as evidence for conceptual primitives.作为概念原语证据的欠压缩错误。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 26;14:1104930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104930. eCollection 2023.
4
Origins of Hierarchical Logical Reasoning.分层逻辑推理的起源。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Feb;47(2):e13250. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13250.
5
Category Clustering and Morphological Learning.类别聚类和形态学学习。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13107. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13107.
6
Beyond input: Language learners produce novel relative clause types without exposure.超越输入:语言学习者在未接触的情况下产出新颖的关系从句类型。
J Cogn Psychol (Hove). 2021;33(5):483-517. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2021.1928678. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Restrictiveness matters.限制性很重要。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):138-139. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1194-3.
8
Culture and biology in the origins of linguistic structure.语言结构起源中的文化与生物学
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Feb;24(1):118-137. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1166-7.
9
Influence of Perceptual Saliency Hierarchy on Learning of Language Structures: An Artificial Language Learning Experiment.感知显著性层次对语言结构学习的影响:一项人工语言学习实验
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 21;7:1952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01952. eCollection 2016.
10
Culture shapes the evolution of cognition.文化塑造认知的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 19;113(16):4530-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523631113. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Word-types, not word-tokens, facilitate extraction of phonotactic sequences by adults.词类而非词符有助于成年人提取音位序列。
Lab Phonol. 2011 May;2(1):157-183. doi: 10.1515/labphon.2011.005. Epub 2011 May 3.
2
How hierarchical is language use?语言使用的层级结构是怎样的?
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 22;279(1747):4522-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1741. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
3
Learning biases predict a word order universal.学习偏见预测了一种语序普遍性。
Cognition. 2012 Mar;122(3):306-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
4
Poverty of the stimulus revisited.重新审视刺激不足问题。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(7):1207-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
5
Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.带有实质偏见的语音学习:关于软腭化的实验和计算研究。
Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep 10;30(5):945-82. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89.
6
Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence.揭示刺激的丰富性:结构依存性和间接统计证据。
Cogn Sci. 2005 Nov 12;29(6):1007-28. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_28.
7
Bigrams and the richness of the stimulus.双词和刺激的丰富度。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Jun;32(4):771-87. doi: 10.1080/03640210802067053.
8
Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure.人类句子处理系统对层次结构不敏感。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):829-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797611409589. Epub 2011 May 17.
9
Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals.语言的进化结构显示了语序共性在谱系特异性方面的趋势。
Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):79-82. doi: 10.1038/nature09923. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
10
How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.如何培养思维:统计、结构与抽象。
Science. 2011 Mar 11;331(6022):1279-85. doi: 10.1126/science.1192788.