Carver Jordan, Ganus Ashley, Ivey Jon Mark, Plummer Teresa, Eubank Ann
a School of Occupational Therapy, Belmont University , Nashville , TN , USA.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016 Aug;11(6):468-77. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1027295. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
This study aims to address the gap in research and contribute to the body of knowledge on the perspectives assistive technology device users have toward their devices.
Mixed methods were used to better understand the impact of mobility assistive technology devices (MATDs) on participation for individuals with disabilities. The Functional Mobility Assessment was administered in conjunction with two qualitative questions developed by the research team allowing participants to expound on the impact of their MATD experience. Participants were recruited online via the National Spinal Cord Injury Association website and in-person at Abilities Expo in Atlanta, Georgia, and the International Seating Symposium in Nashville, Tennessee.
Results are consistent with findings from prior research regarding accessibility for individuals with disabilities. Corresponding findings were found in both the quantitative and qualitative data and are categorized into several major themes: environment (indoor and outdoor), surface heights, transportation, dependence, independence, quality of life and participation.
Quantitative data from this study indicate that users of MATD are satisfied with the way in which their devices enable maneuvering indoors, while qualitative data suggest otherwise. Implications for healthcare practitioners are described and future recommendations are provided. Implications for Rehabilitation Healthcare professionals should advocate for proper mobility assistive technology devices (MATDs) for their patients in order to enable increased independence, safety and efficiency. Healthcare professionals must be cognizant of the impact of the environment and/or environmental barriers when prescribing MATD. Additional areas of interest for future research may include investigating the impact of MATD in association with date of onset of disability, according to diagnoses, or specific to length of time since acquiring the device.
本研究旨在填补研究空白,为辅助技术设备使用者对其设备的看法这一知识体系做出贡献。
采用混合方法,以更好地理解移动辅助技术设备(MATD)对残疾个体参与度的影响。进行了功能移动性评估,并结合研究团队提出的两个定性问题,让参与者阐述其MATD体验的影响。通过国家脊髓损伤协会网站在线招募参与者,并在佐治亚州亚特兰大的能力博览会和田纳西州纳什维尔的国际座椅研讨会上进行现场招募。
结果与先前关于残疾人无障碍环境的研究结果一致。在定量和定性数据中均发现了相应的结果,并归类为几个主要主题:环境(室内和室外)、表面高度、交通、依赖、独立、生活质量和参与度。
本研究的定量数据表明,MATD使用者对其设备在室内实现机动性的方式感到满意,而定性数据则不然。描述了对医疗从业者的启示,并提供了未来的建议。对康复的启示 医疗保健专业人员应为其患者倡导使用合适的移动辅助技术设备(MATD),以提高独立性、安全性和效率。医疗保健专业人员在开具MATD处方时必须认识到环境和/或环境障碍的影响。未来研究的其他感兴趣领域可能包括根据诊断情况,或具体针对获得该设备后的时间长度,调查MATD与残疾发病日期相关的影响。