Boice J D
Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Centre, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
Ann ICRP. 2015 Jun;44(1 Suppl):236-48. doi: 10.1177/0146645315575877. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
Recent record-linkage studies of cancer risk following computed tomography (CT) procedures among children and adolescents under 21 years of age must be interpreted with caution. The reasons why the examinations were performed were not known, and the dosimetric approaches did not include individual dose reconstructions or account for the possibility for missed examinations. The recent report (2013) on children by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation concluded that the associations may have resulted from confounding by indication (also called 'reverse causation'), and not radiation exposure. The reported cancer associations may very well have been related to the patients' underlying health conditions that prompted the examinations. Reverse causation has been observed in other epidemiological investigations, such as a Swedish study of thyroid cancer risk following I-131 scintillation imaging scans, and in studies of brain cancer risk following Thorotrast for cerebral angiography. Epidemiological patterns reported in the CT studies were also inconsistent with the world's literature. For example, in a UK study, teenagers had a higher risk of brain tumour than young children; in an Australian study, cancers not previously linked to radiation were significantly elevated; and in a Taiwanese study, the risk of benign tumours decreased with age at the time of CT examination. In all studies, solid tumours appeared much earlier than previously reported. Remarkably, in the Australian study, brain cancer excesses were seen regardless of whether or not the CT was to the head, i.e. a significant excess was reported for CT examinations of the abdomen and extremities, which involved no radiation exposure to the brain. In the UK study, the significance of the 'leukaemia' finding was only because myelodysplastic syndrome was added to the category, and there was no significance for leukaemia alone. Without knowledge of why CT examinations were performed, any future studies will be equally difficult to interpret. It is noteworthy that two recent studies of children in France and Germany found no significant excess cancer risk from CT scans once adjustment was made for conditions that prompted the scan, family history, or other predisposing factors known to be associated with increased cancer risk. Nonetheless, such studies have heightened awareness of these relatively high-dose diagnostic procedures, and the need to reduce unnecessary examinations and lower the dose per examination commensurate with the desired image quality.
对于21岁以下儿童和青少年进行计算机断层扫描(CT)检查后癌症风险的近期记录链接研究必须谨慎解读。进行这些检查的原因并不明确,剂量测定方法既未包括个体剂量重建,也未考虑漏检的可能性。联合国原子辐射影响科学委员会2013年发布的关于儿童的报告得出结论,这些关联可能是由指征混淆(也称为“反向因果关系”)导致的,而非辐射暴露。报告的癌症关联很可能与促使进行检查的患者潜在健康状况有关。反向因果关系在其他流行病学调查中也有观察到,比如瑞典一项关于I - 131闪烁成像扫描后甲状腺癌风险的研究,以及关于脑造影剂钍造影剂用于脑血管造影后脑癌风险的研究。CT研究中报告的流行病学模式也与全球文献不一致。例如,在英国一项研究中,青少年患脑肿瘤的风险高于幼儿;在澳大利亚一项研究中,先前未与辐射相关联的癌症显著增加;在台湾一项研究中,良性肿瘤的风险随CT检查时的年龄增长而降低。在所有研究中,实体瘤出现的时间比先前报告的要早得多。值得注意的是,在澳大利亚的研究中,无论CT检查部位是否为头部,都出现了脑癌病例增加的情况,即腹部和四肢的CT检查报告了显著的病例增加,而这些部位的检查并未使脑部受到辐射暴露。在英国的研究中,“白血病”发现的显著性仅仅是因为骨髓增生异常综合征被纳入该类别,单独的白血病并无显著性。如果不知道进行CT检查的原因,未来的任何研究都同样难以解读。值得注意的是,法国和德国近期对儿童的两项研究发现,一旦对促使扫描的病情、家族史或其他已知与癌症风险增加相关的易感因素进行调整,CT扫描并未发现显著的额外癌症风险。尽管如此,此类研究提高了对这些相对高剂量诊断程序的认识,以及减少不必要检查并根据所需图像质量降低每次检查剂量的必要性。