Fernandez-Palomo Cristian, Bräuer-Krisch Elke, Laissue Jean, Vukmirovic Dusan, Blattmann Hans, Seymour Colin, Schültke Elisabeth, Mothersill Carmel
Department of Medical Physics and Applied Radiation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP 220 6, rue Jules Horowitz, 38043 Grenoble, France.
Phys Med. 2015 Sep;31(6):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
The question of whether bystander and abscopal effects are the same is unclear. Our experimental system enables us to address this question by allowing irradiated organisms to partner with unexposed individuals. Organs from both animals and appropriate sham and scatter dose controls are tested for expression of several endpoints such as calcium flux, role of 5HT, reporter assay cell death and proteomic profile. The results show that membrane related functions of calcium and 5HT are critical for true bystander effect expression. Our original inter-animal experiments used fish species whole body irradiated with low doses of X-rays, which prevented us from addressing the abscopal effect question. Data which are much more relevant in radiotherapy are now available for rats which received high dose local irradiation to the implanted right brain glioma. The data were generated using quasi-parallel microbeams at the biomedical beamline at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble France. This means we can directly compare abscopal and "true" bystander effects in a rodent tumour model. Analysis of right brain hemisphere, left brain and urinary bladder in the directly irradiated animals and their unirradiated partners strongly suggests that bystander effects (in partner animals) are not the same as abscopal effects (in the irradiated animal). Furthermore, the presence of a tumour in the right brain alters the magnitude of both abscopal and bystander effects in the tissues from the directly irradiated animal and in the unirradiated partners which did not contain tumours, meaning the type of signal was different.
旁观者效应和远隔效应是否相同尚不清楚。我们的实验系统通过让受辐照生物与未受辐照个体配对,使我们能够解决这个问题。对来自动物的器官以及适当的假照射和散射剂量对照进行测试,以检测钙通量、5-羟色胺(5HT)的作用、报告基因检测细胞死亡和蛋白质组学图谱等几个终点指标的表达情况。结果表明,钙和5HT的膜相关功能对于真正的旁观者效应表达至关重要。我们最初的动物间实验使用低剂量X射线全身辐照鱼类,这使我们无法解决远隔效应问题。现在有了与放射治疗更相关的数据,这些数据来自对植入右脑海马瘤进行高剂量局部辐照的大鼠。这些数据是在法国格勒诺布尔欧洲同步辐射装置的生物医学束线使用准平行微束产生的。这意味着我们可以在啮齿动物肿瘤模型中直接比较远隔效应和“真正的”旁观者效应。对直接受辐照动物及其未受辐照的配对动物的右脑半球、左脑和膀胱进行分析,强烈表明旁观者效应(在配对动物中)与远隔效应(在受辐照动物中)不同。此外,右脑中肿瘤的存在改变了直接受辐照动物组织以及不含肿瘤的未受辐照配对动物中远隔效应和旁观者效应的程度,这意味着信号类型不同。