King Renee, Heisler Michele, Sayre Michael R, Colbert Susan H, Bond-Zielinski Cindy, Rabe Marilyn, Eigel Brian, Sasson Comilla
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):308-12. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.964889.
High-risk neighborhoods can be identified as census tracts in which cardiac arrest incidence is high and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prevalence is low. However, little is known about how best to tailor community CPR training to high-risk neighborhood residents. The objective of this study was to identify factors integral to the design and implementation of community-based CPR intervention programs targeted to these areas.
Using qualitative methods, six focus groups with 42 participants were conducted in high-risk neighborhoods in Columbus, Ohio during January and February 2011 to elicit resident views on how best to design community-based CPR educational programs for these neighborhoods. Snowball and purposeful sampling by community liaisons was used to recruit participants. Three reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes.
Focus group participants identified four principal considerations for the design of community-based CPR interventions: 1) identifying lay people to serve as motivated leaders while targeting both senior citizens and school children to increase reach, 2) finding appropriate community-based locations to hold CPR training, 3) providing incentives to encourage more people to participate, and 4) identifying and addressing barriers to participation.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a particular risk for minority and low-income communities. By working together with the community key factors integral to designing community-based CPR within these high-risk communities can be identified and implemented.
高风险社区可被确定为心脏骤停发生率高且旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)普及率低的人口普查区。然而,对于如何最好地为高风险社区居民量身定制社区心肺复苏培训,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定针对这些地区的社区心肺复苏干预项目设计和实施中不可或缺的因素。
采用定性方法,2011年1月和2月在俄亥俄州哥伦布市的高风险社区进行了6个焦点小组讨论,42名参与者参与其中,以了解居民对于如何最好地为这些社区设计社区心肺复苏教育项目的看法。通过社区联络人进行滚雪球式和有目的的抽样来招募参与者。三名评审员采用迭代过程分析数据,以确定反复出现的统一主题。
焦点小组参与者确定了社区心肺复苏干预设计的四个主要考虑因素:1)确定外行人担任积极的领导者,同时针对老年人和学童以扩大覆盖面;2)找到合适的社区场所进行心肺复苏培训;3)提供激励措施以鼓励更多人参与;4)识别并解决参与障碍。
院外心脏骤停对少数族裔和低收入社区来说是一种特殊风险。通过与社区合作,可以确定并实施这些高风险社区内基于社区的心肺复苏设计中不可或缺的关键因素。