Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London.
Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):639-54. doi: 10.1037/xge0000065. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 144(3) of Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (see record 2015-24174-008). The affiliations for co-authors Kuangjie Zhang and Steven Sweldens were incorrect. All versions of this article have been corrected.] A rich tradition in self-control research has documented the negative consequences of exerting self-control in 1 task for self-control performance in subsequent tasks. However, there is a dearth of research examining what happens when people exert self-control in multiple domains simultaneously. The current research aims to fill this gap. We integrate predictions from the most prominent models of self-control with recent neuropsychological insights in the human inhibition system to generate the novel hypothesis that exerting effortful self-control in 1 task can simultaneously improve self-control in completely unrelated domains. An internal meta-analysis on all 18 studies we conducted shows that exerting self-control in 1 domain (i.e., controlling attention, food consumption, emotions, or thoughts) simultaneously improves self-control in a range of other domains, as demonstrated by, for example, reduced unhealthy food consumption, better Stroop task performance, and less impulsive decision making. A subset of 9 studies demonstrates the crucial nature of task timing-when the same tasks are executed sequentially, our results suggest the emergence of an ego depletion effect. We provide conservative estimates of the self-control facilitation (d = |0.22|) as well as the ego depletion effect size (d = |0.17|) free of data selection and publication biases. These results (a) shed new light on self-control theories, (b) confirm recent claims that previous estimates of the ego depletion effect size were inflated due to publication bias, and (c) provide a blueprint for how to handle the power issues and associated file drawer problems commonly encountered in multistudy research projects.
[勘误通知:在《实验心理学杂志:一般》第 144(3)卷中报告了一篇文章的勘误(见记录 2015-24174-008)。共同作者张匡杰和史蒂文·斯韦尔登斯的所属单位有误。这篇文章的所有版本都已更正。] 自我控制研究中有丰富的传统,记录了在一项任务中运用自我控制会对随后任务中的自我控制表现产生负面影响。然而,目前还缺乏研究来考察当人们同时在多个领域运用自我控制时会发生什么。目前的研究旨在填补这一空白。我们将自我控制最主要的模型与最近关于人类抑制系统的神经心理学见解相结合,提出了一个新颖的假设,即在一项任务中运用努力的自我控制可以同时改善完全不相关的领域的自我控制。我们进行的所有 18 项研究的内部元分析表明,在一个领域(即控制注意力、食物消费、情绪或思维)中运用自我控制可以同时改善一系列其他领域的自我控制,例如减少不健康的食物消费、提高斯特鲁普任务的表现和减少冲动决策。9 项研究中的一项表明了任务时间的关键性质——当相同的任务按顺序执行时,我们的结果表明自我损耗效应的出现。我们提供了自我控制促进作用(d = |0.22|)以及自我损耗效应大小(d = |0.17|)的保守估计,这些估计不受数据选择和发表偏倚的影响。这些结果:(a)为自我控制理论提供了新的见解;(b)证实了最近的说法,即由于发表偏倚,以前对自我损耗效应大小的估计被夸大了;(c)为如何处理多研究项目中常见的权力问题和相关的文件抽屉问题提供了蓝图。