Kanai Ryota, Komura Yutaka, Shipp Stewart, Friston Karl
School of Psychology, Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan.
School of Psychology, Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan Systems Neuroscience, Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8568, Japan.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 19;370(1668). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0169.
This paper considers neuronal architectures from a computational perspective and asks what aspects of neuroanatomy and neurophysiology can be disclosed by the nature of neuronal computations? In particular, we extend current formulations of the brain as an organ of inference--based upon hierarchical predictive coding--and consider how these inferences are orchestrated. In other words, what would the brain require to dynamically coordinate and contextualize its message passing to optimize its computational goals? The answer that emerges rests on the delicate (modulatory) gain control of neuronal populations that select and coordinate (prediction error) signals that ascend cortical hierarchies. This is important because it speaks to a hierarchical anatomy of extrinsic (between region) connections that form two distinct classes, namely a class of driving (first-order) connections that are concerned with encoding the content of neuronal representations and a class of modulatory (second-order) connections that establish context-in the form of the salience or precision ascribed to content. We explore the implications of this distinction from a formal perspective (using simulations of feature-ground segregation) and consider the neurobiological substrates of the ensuing precision-engineered dynamics, with a special focus on the pulvinar and attention.
本文从计算角度审视神经元架构,并探讨神经解剖学和神经生理学的哪些方面能够通过神经元计算的本质得以揭示?具体而言,我们扩展了当前将大脑视为基于分层预测编码的推理器官的表述,并思考这些推理是如何被精心安排的。换句话说,大脑需要什么来动态协调其信息传递并将其置于情境中,以优化其计算目标?得出的答案依赖于对神经元群体的精细(调制性)增益控制,这些神经元群体选择并协调向上传递至皮层层级的(预测误差)信号。这一点很重要,因为它涉及到外在(区域间)连接的分层解剖结构,这些连接形成了两个不同的类别,即一类驱动性(一阶)连接,其与编码神经元表征的内容有关,以及一类调制性(二阶)连接,其以赋予内容的显著性或精度的形式建立情境。我们从形式角度(使用特征 - 背景分离模拟)探讨这种区别的含义,并考虑由此产生的精确工程动力学的神经生物学基础,特别关注丘脑枕和注意力。