• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用虚拟环境研究儿童行人行为:父母期望与儿童过街行为的比较

Using a virtual environment to study child pedestrian behaviours: a comparison of parents' expectations and children's street crossing behaviour.

作者信息

Morrongiello Barbara A, Corbett Michael

机构信息

Psychology Department, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2015 Oct;21(5):291-5. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041508. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041508
PMID:25825352
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare parents' expectations for their children crossing streets with children's actual crossing behaviours and determine how accurately parents judge their own children's pedestrian behaviours to be.

METHOD

Using a fully immersive virtual reality system interfaced with a 3D movement measurement system, younger (7-9 years) and older (10-12 years) children's crossing behaviours were assessed. The parent viewed the same traffic conditions and indicated if their child would cross and how successful she/he expected the child would be when doing so.

RESULTS

Comparing children's performance with what their parents expected they would do revealed that parents significantly overestimated the inter-vehicle gap threshold of their children, erroneously assuming that children would show safer pedestrian behaviours and select larger inter-vehicle gaps to cross into than they actually did; there were no effects of child age or sex. Child and parent scores were not correlated and a logistic regression indicated these were independent of one another.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents were not accurate in estimating the traffic conditions under which their children would try and cross the street. If parents are not adequately supervising when children cross streets, they may be placing their children at risk of pedestrian injury because they are assuming their children will select larger (safer) inter-vehicle gaps when crossing than children actually do.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较父母对孩子过马路的期望与孩子实际的过马路行为,并确定父母对自己孩子行人行为的判断准确程度。

方法

使用与3D运动测量系统接口的全沉浸式虚拟现实系统,对年幼(7 - 9岁)和年长(10 - 12岁)儿童的过马路行为进行评估。家长观看相同的交通状况,并指出他们的孩子是否会过马路以及他们期望孩子过马路时的成功率。

结果

将孩子的表现与父母对他们行为的期望进行比较发现,父母显著高估了孩子的车间距阈值,错误地认为孩子会表现出更安全的行人行为,并选择比实际更大的车间距过马路;孩子的年龄和性别没有影响。孩子和家长的得分不相关,逻辑回归表明二者相互独立。

结论

父母在估计孩子试图过马路时的交通状况方面并不准确。如果父母在孩子过马路时没有进行充分监督,他们可能会使孩子面临行人受伤的风险,因为他们认为孩子过马路时会选择比实际更大(更安全)的车间距。

相似文献

1
Using a virtual environment to study child pedestrian behaviours: a comparison of parents' expectations and children's street crossing behaviour.使用虚拟环境研究儿童行人行为:父母期望与儿童过街行为的比较
Inj Prev. 2015 Oct;21(5):291-5. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041508. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
2
Using a Virtual Environment to Examine How Children Cross Streets: Advancing Our Understanding of How Injury Risk Arises.利用虚拟环境研究儿童如何过马路:深化我们对伤害风险产生方式的理解。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Mar;41(2):265-75. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv078. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
Behavior and parental expectations of child pedestrians.儿童行人的行为及父母期望
Pediatrics. 1992 Mar;89(3):486-90.
4
Child pedestrian behaviors: Influence of peer social norms and correspondence between self-reports and crossing behaviors.儿童行人行为:同伴社会规范的影响以及自我报告与过街行为的一致性。
J Safety Res. 2019 Feb;68:197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.014. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Using a Virtual Environment to Study Pedestrian Behaviors: How Does Time Pressure Affect Children's and Adults' Street Crossing Behaviors?使用虚拟环境研究行人行为:时间压力如何影响儿童和成人的过街行为?
J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Aug;40(7):697-703. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv019. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
6
Innovations in using virtual reality to study how children cross streets in traffic: evidence for evasive action skills.利用虚拟现实研究儿童如何在交通中过马路的创新:规避行动技能的证据
Inj Prev. 2015 Aug;21(4):266-70. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2014-041357. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Examining the impact of traffic environment and executive functioning on children's pedestrian behaviors.考察交通环境和执行功能对儿童步行行为的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Jan;47(1):182-91. doi: 10.1037/a0021308.
8
Effects of Peers on Child Pedestrian Behaviors in a Virtual Traffic Context.同伴对虚拟交通情境下儿童行人行为的影响。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2019 May 1;44(4):509-516. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy103.
9
Understanding Sex Differences in Children's Injury Risk as Pedestrians.理解儿童行人受伤风险中的性别差异。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2020 Nov 1;45(10):1144-1152. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa072.
10
How do children learn to cross the street? The process of pedestrian safety training.儿童如何学习过马路?行人安全培训的过程。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Aug 17;17(6):573-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1125478. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cyborg Children: A Systematic Literature Review on the Experience of Children Using Extended Reality.半机械人儿童:关于儿童使用扩展现实体验的系统文献综述
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 14;11(8):984. doi: 10.3390/children11080984.
2
Roadside experiences of parents of children with developmental coordination disorder and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.发育协调障碍和/或注意力缺陷多动障碍患儿家长的路边经历。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Apr 10;18:1339043. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1339043. eCollection 2024.
3
Roles of individual differences and traffic environment factors on children's street-crossing behaviour in a VR environment.
个体差异和交通环境因素对儿童在 VR 环境中过街行为的影响。
Inj Prev. 2020 Oct;26(5):417-423. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043268. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
4
Gender differences in children's pedestrian behaviors: Developmental effects.儿童行人行为中的性别差异:发展影响。
J Safety Res. 2018 Dec;67:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effectiveness of a Pedestrian Training Program That Teaches Children Where and How to Cross the Street Safely.一项测试行人训练计划有效性的试点随机对照试验,该计划教导儿童在哪里以及如何安全地过马路。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Nov 1;43(10):1147-1159. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy056.
6
Cognitive-Motor Interference in an Ecologically Valid Street Crossing Scenario.生态有效街道穿越场景中的认知-运动干扰
Front Psychol. 2018 May 3;9:602. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00602. eCollection 2018.