Fuller N R, Williams K, Shrestha R, Ahern A L, Holzapfel C, Hauner H, Jebb S A, Caterson I D
The Boden Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Clin Obes. 2014 Jun;4(3):127-35. doi: 10.1111/cob.12057. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
Physical activity is an important component in weight loss treatment and weight maintenance. We evaluated the physical activity component of two weight loss programmes, either standard care (SC) as defined by national guidelines, or a commercial programme (CP; Weight Watchers) over the period of weight loss and follow-up. 772 adults (mean body mass index: 31.4 ± 2.6 kg m(-2)) were recruited by primary care practices in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Germany, and randomly assigned to 12 months SC, or the CP. They were then followed up at 24 months. Change in physical activity levels were assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-short form, and pedometer recordings. Both groups reported increases in physical activity using the IPAQ from baseline to 12 months and 24 months (within groups P < 0.0001) and in pedometer steps from baseline to 12 months only (within groups P < 0.0001). Differences between groups with both methods of assessment were not significant. There was a significant difference in weight loss between the groups at 12 months favouring the CP group; however, this statistical difference was not maintained at 24 months. In conclusion, despite similar increases in reported activity, there were significant differences in weight loss and regain between groups. Therefore, greater weight loss seen with the CP is unlikely to be due to increases in physical activity. Trends in pedometer steps mirrored changes in weight over time more closely than the IPAQ; however, both assessment tools have limitations. Better activity assessment measures are needed to more accurately gauge changes in physical activity during weight loss interventions.
体育活动是减肥治疗和体重维持的重要组成部分。我们评估了两个减肥计划中的体育活动部分,一个是国家指南定义的标准护理(SC),另一个是商业计划(CP;慧俪轻体),涵盖减肥期和随访期。澳大利亚、英国和德国的初级医疗保健机构招募了772名成年人(平均体重指数:31.4±2.6kg/m²),并将他们随机分配到12个月的SC组或CP组。然后对他们进行24个月的随访。通过国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)简表和计步器记录来评估体力活动水平的变化。两组均报告,从基线到12个月和24个月,使用IPAQ评估的体力活动增加(组内P<0.0001),且仅从基线到12个月计步器步数增加(组内P<0.0001)。两种评估方法在组间的差异均不显著。12个月时两组间的体重减轻存在显著差异,CP组更占优势;然而,这种统计学差异在24个月时未持续存在。总之,尽管报告的活动增加相似,但两组间在体重减轻和体重反弹方面存在显著差异。因此,CP组更大的体重减轻不太可能归因于体力活动的增加。随着时间推移,计步器步数的变化趋势比IPAQ更能反映体重变化;然而,两种评估工具都有局限性。需要更好的活动评估方法来更准确地衡量减肥干预期间体力活动的变化。