FAMILY: A Jockey Club Initiative for a Harmonious Society, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 21;8:115. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-115.
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) has been recommended as a cost-effective method to assess physical activity. Several studies validating the IPAQ-SF have been conducted with differing results, but no systematic review of these studies has been reported.
The keywords "IPAQ", "validation", and "validity" were searched in PubMed and Scopus. Studies published in English that validated the IPAQ-SF against an objective physical activity measuring device, doubly labeled water, or an objective fitness measure were included.
Twenty-three validation studies were included in this review. There was a great deal of variability in the methods used across studies, but the results were largely similar. Correlations between the total physical activity level measured by the IPAQ-SF and objective standards ranged from 0.09 to 0.39; none reached the minimal acceptable standard in the literature (0.50 for objective activity measuring devices, 0.40 for fitness measures). Correlations between sections of the IPAQ-SF for vigorous activity or moderate activity level/walking and an objective standard showed even greater variability (-0.18 to 0.76), yet several reached the minimal acceptable standard. Only six studies provided comparisons between physical activity levels derived from the IPAQ-SF and those obtained from objective criterion. In most studies the IPAQ-SF overestimated physical activity level by 36 to 173 percent; one study underestimated by 28 percent.
The correlation between the IPAQ-SF and objective measures of activity or fitness in the large majority of studies was lower than the acceptable standard. Furthermore, the IPAQ-SF typically overestimated physical activity as measured by objective criterion by an average of 84 percent. Hence, the evidence to support the use of the IPAQ-SF as an indicator of relative or absolute physical activity is weak.
国际体力活动问卷-短表(IPAQ-SF)已被推荐为一种经济有效的评估体力活动的方法。已经有几项验证 IPAQ-SF 的研究得出了不同的结果,但没有对这些研究进行系统的综述。
在 PubMed 和 Scopus 中使用关键词“IPAQ”、“验证”和“有效性”进行检索。纳入了使用 IPAQ-SF 与客观体力活动测量设备(双标水或客观体能测量)进行验证的英文发表研究。
本综述纳入了 23 项验证研究。研究之间使用的方法存在很大差异,但结果基本相似。IPAQ-SF 测量的总体力活动水平与客观标准之间的相关性范围为 0.09 至 0.39;没有一项达到文献中最小可接受标准(0.50 用于客观活动测量设备,0.40 用于体能测量)。IPAQ-SF 中剧烈活动或中高强度活动/步行部分与客观标准之间的相关性差异更大(-0.18 至 0.76),但有几项达到了最小可接受标准。只有 6 项研究提供了 IPAQ-SF 得出的体力活动水平与客观标准得出的体力活动水平之间的比较。在大多数研究中,IPAQ-SF 高估了 36%至 173%的体力活动水平;一项研究低估了 28%。
在大多数研究中,IPAQ-SF 与活动或体能的客观测量之间的相关性低于可接受标准。此外,IPAQ-SF 通常高估了 84%的客观标准测量的体力活动。因此,支持 IPAQ-SF 作为相对或绝对体力活动指标的证据较弱。