Suppr超能文献

精神科住院后的首次门诊随访:一种模式适用于所有人吗?

First outpatient follow-up after psychiatric hospitalization: does one size fit all?

作者信息

Beadles Christopher A, Ellis Alan R, Lichstein Jesse C, Farley Joel F, Jackson Carlos T, Morrissey Joseph P, Domino Marisa Elena

机构信息

Dr. Beadles is with RTI International, Durham, North Carolina. He is also with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina (UNC), Chapel Hill (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Apr 1;66(4):364-72. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400081. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Claims-based indicators of follow-up within seven and 30 days after psychiatric discharge have face validity as quality measures: early follow-up may improve disease management and guide appropriate service use. Yet these indicators are rarely examined empirically. This study assessed their association with subsequent health care utilization for adults with comorbid conditions.

METHODS

Postdischarge follow-up and subsequent utilization were examined among adults enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid who were discharged with claims-based diagnoses of depression or schizophrenia and not readmitted within 30 days. A total of 24,934 discharges (18,341 individuals) in fiscal years 2008-2010 were analyzed. Follow-up was categorized as occurring within 0-7 days, 8-30 days, or none in 30 days. Outcomes in the subsequent six months included psychotropic medication claims, adherence (proportion of days covered), number of hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits.

RESULTS

Follow-up within seven days was associated with greater medication adherence and outpatient utilization, compared with no follow-up in 30 days. This was observed for both follow-up with a mental health provider and with any provider. Adults receiving mental health follow-up within seven days had equivalent, or lower, subsequent inpatient and emergency department utilization as those without follow-up within 30 days. However, adults receiving follow-up with any provider within seven days were more likely than those with no follow-up to have an inpatient admission or emergency department visit in the subsequent six months. Few differences in subsequent utilization were observed between mental health follow-up within seven days versus eight to 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients not readmitted within 30 days, follow-up within 30 days appeared to be beneficial on the basis of subsequent service utilization.

摘要

目的

基于索赔的精神病出院后7天和30天内随访指标作为质量衡量标准具有表面效度:早期随访可能改善疾病管理并指导合理使用服务。然而,这些指标很少经过实证检验。本研究评估了它们与患有合并症的成年人后续医疗保健利用情况的关联。

方法

对北卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划登记的成年人进行出院后随访及后续利用情况调查,这些成年人出院时基于索赔诊断为抑郁症或精神分裂症,且在30天内未再次入院。对2008 - 2010财年的24,934次出院(18,341名个体)进行了分析。随访分为在0 - 7天内、8 - 30天内或30天内无随访。后续六个月的结果包括精神药物索赔、依从性(覆盖天数比例)、住院次数、急诊就诊次数和门诊就诊次数。

结果

与30天内无随访相比,7天内随访与更高的药物依从性和门诊利用率相关。这在接受心理健康提供者随访和接受任何提供者随访的情况下均有观察到。在7天内接受心理健康随访的成年人与30天内未接受随访的成年人相比,其后续住院和急诊利用情况相当或更低。然而,在7天内接受任何提供者随访的成年人比未接受随访的成年人在后续六个月内更有可能住院或急诊就诊。7天内心理健康随访与8 - 30天内随访之间在后续利用情况上几乎没有差异。

结论

对于30天内未再次入院的患者,基于后续服务利用情况,30天内随访似乎是有益的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验