• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英格兰和威尔士导致人工膝关节周围感染的微生物。

Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales.

作者信息

Holleyman Richard J, Baker Paul, Charlett Andre, Gould Kate, Deehan David J

机构信息

Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.

Health Education North East, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 8NY, UK.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3080-3087. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3539-2. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-015-3539-2
PMID:25829328
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to delineate epidemiology of infecting microorganism genus in first-time revision knee arthroplasty for indication of periprosthetic joint infection in England and Wales using linked registry data.

METHODS

From the National Joint Registry database for England and Wales, a consecutive series of primary knee arthroplasties performed between April 2003 and January 2014 that went on to have a revision for periprosthetic infection were identified (n = 2810). Each case was then linked to microbiology data held by Public Health England in order to identify infecting microorganism at time of revision surgery established from intra-operative cultures. Following data linkage, 403 culture results at time of revision surgery were identified in a group of 331 patients. The demographic characteristics of five microorganism groups were compared: pure staphylococcus (single genus), pure streptococcus (single genus), other gram-positive infections (single genus), gram-negative infections (single genus) and mixed genus infections.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus species was the most common organism genus isolated after revision of a primary implant for infection and present in 72 % of cases overall (71.3 % of patients with a single-genus infection and 76.8 % of patients with mixed genus infection). A pure staphylococcal infection was present in 59 % of all cases. A single-genus infection was responsible for infection in 83.1 % of cases, and mixed genera were responsible in 16.9 % of cases. A significant difference was observed for mean age at primary procedure in the cohort of patients where there was an isolated pure streptococcal infection (73.2 years) when compared to gram-negative infections (65.0 years). No other significant differences were observed between microorganism groups in terms of BMI, gender, ASA grade, indication for primary procedure and primary implant characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Staphylococci were the most commonly isolated organism species responsible for periprosthetic infection of primary arthroplasty in England and Wales. This information can be used by surgeons to benchmark and audit their own practice against national, publicly available data. Furthermore, this study has shown that even when using the largest national databases available, there is a substantial volume of missing data. Antimicrobial resistance represents a growing clinical problem with significant health and social costs. In order to counteract this threat, this study would advocate the consolidation of national microbial data in order to guide effective strategies towards targeting and combating the threat of antimicrobial resistance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用关联登记数据,描述英格兰和威尔士初次翻修膝关节置换术中用于假体周围感染指征的感染微生物属的流行病学情况。

方法

从英格兰和威尔士国家关节登记数据库中,识别出2003年4月至2014年1月期间连续进行的一系列初次膝关节置换术,这些手术随后因假体周围感染进行了翻修(n = 2810)。然后将每个病例与英国公共卫生部门持有的微生物学数据相链接,以便确定翻修手术时从术中培养物中确定的感染微生物。数据链接后,在331名患者的一组中确定了403份翻修手术时的培养结果。比较了五个微生物组的人口统计学特征:纯葡萄球菌(单一属)、纯链球菌(单一属)、其他革兰氏阳性感染(单一属)、革兰氏阴性感染(单一属)和混合属感染。

结果

葡萄球菌属是初次植入物因感染翻修后分离出的最常见微生物属,总体上存在于72%的病例中(单一属感染患者中的71.3%和混合属感染患者中的76.8%)。所有病例中有59%存在纯葡萄球菌感染。单一属感染导致83.1%的病例感染,混合属感染导致16.9%的病例感染。与革兰氏阴性感染(65.0岁)相比,在孤立的纯链球菌感染队列中,初次手术时的平均年龄存在显著差异(73.2岁)。在微生物组之间,在体重指数、性别、美国麻醉医师协会分级、初次手术指征和初次植入物特征方面未观察到其他显著差异。

结论

葡萄球菌是英格兰和威尔士初次关节置换术假体周围感染中最常分离出的微生物种类。外科医生可利用这些信息,对照全国公开可用的数据来衡量和审核自己的做法。此外,本研究表明,即使使用现有的最大型国家数据库,也存在大量缺失数据。抗菌药物耐药性是一个日益严重的临床问题,会带来巨大的健康和社会成本。为了应对这一威胁,本研究主张整合国家微生物数据,以指导针对和对抗抗菌药物耐药性威胁的有效策略。

证据水平

IV级。

相似文献

1
Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales.在英格兰和威尔士导致人工膝关节周围感染的微生物。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3080-3087. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3539-2. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Does pre-operative sampling predict intra-operative cultures and antibiotic sensitivities in knee replacements revised for infection?: a study using the NJR dataset.对于因感染而翻修的膝关节置换术,术前采样能否预测术中培养结果及抗生素敏感性?一项使用英国国家关节注册处(NJR)数据集的研究
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3056-3063. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3841-z. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
Analysis of causative microorganism in 248 primary hip arthroplasties revised for infection: a study using the NJR dataset.对248例因感染而翻修的初次髋关节置换术的致病微生物分析:一项使用英国国家关节注册处(NJR)数据集的研究
Hip Int. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):82-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000313. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
4
Identifying Common Pathogens in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Testing Drug-resistance Rate for Different Antibiotics: A Prospective, Single Center Study in Beijing.确定人工关节感染中的常见病原体并检测不同抗生素的耐药率:一项在北京开展的前瞻性单中心研究
Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug;10(3):235-240. doi: 10.1111/os.12394.
5
Staphylococcal resistance profiles in deep infection following primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a study using the NJR dataset.初次髋关节和膝关节置换术后深部感染的葡萄球菌耐药谱:使用 NJR 数据集的研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Sep;139(9):1209-1215. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03155-1. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Risk factors associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection following knee replacement: an observational cohort study from England and Wales.与膝关节置换术后人工关节感染返修相关的风险因素:来自英格兰和威尔士的观察性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;19(6):589-600. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30755-2. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
7
Younger age is associated with a higher risk of early periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty.年龄较轻与全膝关节置换术后早期假体周围关节感染和无菌性机械故障的风险增加相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):529-35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00545.
8
Antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria infecting total joint arthroplasty sites.感染全关节置换部位的细菌对抗生素的敏感性
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1231-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00004.
9
Bacteriology and risk factors associated with periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: retrospective study of 2543 cases.初次全膝关节置换术后人工关节周围感染相关的细菌学及危险因素:2543例病例的回顾性研究
Hong Kong Med J. 2018 Apr;24(2):152-157. doi: 10.12809/hkmj176885.
10
A positive bacterial culture during re-implantation is associated with a poor outcome in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for deep infection.再植入过程中细菌培养呈阳性与深部感染二期翻修关节成形术的不良预后相关。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1490-1495. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2017-0243-R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Polymicrobial Prosthetic Joint Infections: Unraveling Risk Factors and Outcomes in a Single-Center Study.多微生物假体关节感染:单中心研究中的风险因素与结局剖析
Microorganisms. 2025 Jul 16;13(7):1679. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13071679.
2
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Providencia stuartii: A Case Report.斯氏普罗威登斯菌引起的人工关节周围感染:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Nov 2;16(11):e72868. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72868. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Effectiveness of two-stage revision with commercial polymethylmethacrylate articulated hip spacer: similar outcomes against monomicrobial and polymicrobial hip periprosthetic joint infections.

本文引用的文献

1
Organism profile in periprosthetic joint infection: pathogens differ at two arthroplasty infection referral centers in Europe and in the United States.人工关节感染中的微生物概况:欧洲和美国两个关节置换感染转诊中心的病原体存在差异。
J Knee Surg. 2014 Oct;27(5):399-406. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1364102. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
2
Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.修订原因 TKA 预测临床结果:前瞻性评估 150 例连续患者,随访 2 年。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2296-302. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2940-8. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
3
使用商用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯人工髋关节间隔物进行两阶段翻修术的有效性:针对单一微生物和多微生物髋关节假体周围感染的相似结果。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2023 Feb 6;8(1):51-57. doi: 10.5194/jbji-8-51-2023. eCollection 2023.
4
Pathogenic bacteria characteristics and drug resistance in acute, delayed, and chronic periprosthetic joint infection: A retrospective analysis of 202 patients.急性、延迟和慢性假体周围关节感染的病原菌特征和耐药性:202 例患者的回顾性分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):3315-3323. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14212. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Implant surface modifications as a prevention method for periprosthetic joint infection caused by : a systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体表面改性作为预防由……引起的人工关节周围感染的方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。 (原文中“caused by”后内容缺失)
J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 Nov 14;7(6):231-239. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-231-2022. eCollection 2022.
6
Antifungal-Loaded Acrylic Bone Cement in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: A Review.载抗真菌剂的丙烯酸骨水泥治疗人工关节周围髋膝关节感染的综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;11(7):879. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070879.
7
Bi-functional titanium-polydopamine-zinc coatings for infection inhibition and enhanced osseointegration.用于感染抑制和增强骨整合的双功能钛-聚多巴胺-锌涂层
RSC Adv. 2019 Jan 22;9(6):2892-2905. doi: 10.1039/c8ra09112a.
8
Occurrence of Rare Pathogens at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study.人工髋关节和膝关节置换感染部位罕见病原体的发生情况:一项回顾性单中心研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jul 20;10(7):882. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10070882.
9
Microbiology of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections in Surgically Revised Cases from 34 Centers in Mainland China.中国大陆34个中心手术翻修病例中人工髋关节和膝关节周围感染的微生物学研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Jun 25;14:2411-2418. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S305205. eCollection 2021.
10
Factors affecting the incidence of surgical site infection after geriatric hip fracture surgery: a retrospective multicenter study.影响老年髋部骨折手术后手术部位感染发生率的因素:一项回顾性多中心研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 21;14(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1449-6.
Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two-stage revision.
翻修感染性 TKR 后患者报告的结局测量指标:单阶段与双阶段翻修的比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2713-20. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
4
Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States.美国人工关节置换术后感染的经济负担。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Sep;27(8 Suppl):61-5.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 May 2.
5
Reason for revision influences early patient outcomes after aseptic knee revision.翻修原因影响无菌膝关节翻修后早期患者结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2244-52. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2278-7. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
6
Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure.二期翻修术治疗感染性全膝关节置换术:失败的预测因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3049-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2030-8.
7
Irrigation and debridement for periprosthetic infections: does the organism matter?人工关节周围感染的灌洗清创术:病原体重要吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6 Suppl):114-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.031. Epub 2011 May 31.
8
Infection control rate of irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic joint infection.人工关节周围感染灌洗清创术的感染控制率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):3043-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1910-2.
9
Microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty: report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register on 426 surgically revised cases.感染性膝关节置换术的微生物学:来自瑞典膝关节置换术登记处对426例手术翻修病例的报告。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(11-12):831-40. doi: 10.3109/00365540903186207.
10
The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.美国翻修全膝关节置换术的流行病学。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0. Epub 2009 Jun 25.