• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

附睾下睾丸切除术能否再度成为晚期前列腺癌患者的首选治疗方法?

Can Subepididymal Orchiectomy Re-emerge as the Treatment of Choice in Patients with Advanced Prostatic Carcinoma?

作者信息

Agarwal Mayank, Agrawal Madhu Sudan

机构信息

Department of Surgery, S. N. Medical College, Agra, India ; 4/18c, Bagh Farzana, Civil Lines, Agra, 282002 Uttar Pradesh India.

Urology Division, Department of Surgery, SN Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh 282002 India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2015 Feb;77(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0741-z. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1007/s12262-012-0741-z
PMID:25829707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4376839/
Abstract

To study the effectiveness of bilateral subepididymal orchiectomy compared to bilateral simple and subcapsular orchiectomy in terms of androgen ablation, control of disease progression and esthetic superiority. 114 patients of advanced prostatic carcinoma (T3, T4, M1) were randomized to 3 groups- Group A: bilateral simple orchiectomy (38 patients), Group B: bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy (38 patients), & Group C: bilateral subepididymal orchiectomy (38 patients). Serum PSA and serum testosterone values were checked pre-operatively and at 3 months follow-up. Patients' esthetic satisfaction was scored on a quality of life scale of 1-5. In Groups A, B and C, at 3 months the post-operative mean serum testosterone values were 34.7, 38.1 and 36.7 ng/dl (p = 0.0524); and mean serum PSA values were 4.2, 3.9 and 3.4 ng/ml (p = 0.09) respectively, the differences not being statistically significant. On esthetic satisfaction scale the average scores were 1.8, 2.7 and 4.0 respectively, the difference being highly significant (p < 0.0001). Subepididymal orchiectomy maintains esthetic appearance of scrotum and provides superior patient satisfaction as compared to standard total and subcapsular orchiectomy, while achieving equal efficacy. Bilateral sub-epididymal orchiectomy may thus be considered procedure of choice to achieve androgen ablation in advanced prostatic carcinoma.

摘要

为研究双侧附睾下睾丸切除术与双侧单纯性及包膜下睾丸切除术相比,在雄激素去除、疾病进展控制和美学优势方面的有效性。114例晚期前列腺癌(T3、T4、M1)患者被随机分为3组——A组:双侧单纯性睾丸切除术(38例患者),B组:双侧包膜下睾丸切除术(38例患者),C组:双侧附睾下睾丸切除术(38例患者)。术前及术后3个月随访时检查血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)和血清睾酮值。根据1 - 5的生活质量量表对患者的美学满意度进行评分。在A组、B组和C组中,术后3个月时的平均血清睾酮值分别为34.7、38.1和36.7 ng/dl(p = 0.0524);平均血清PSA值分别为4.2、3.9和3.4 ng/ml(p = 0.09),差异无统计学意义。在美学满意度量表上,平均得分分别为1.8、2.7和4.0,差异具有高度统计学意义(p < 0.0001)。与标准的全睾丸切除术和包膜下睾丸切除术相比,附睾下睾丸切除术能保持阴囊的美观外观,并使患者满意度更高,同时疗效相当。因此,双侧附睾下睾丸切除术可被视为晚期前列腺癌雄激素去除的首选手术方式。

相似文献

1
Can Subepididymal Orchiectomy Re-emerge as the Treatment of Choice in Patients with Advanced Prostatic Carcinoma?附睾下睾丸切除术能否再度成为晚期前列腺癌患者的首选治疗方法?
Indian J Surg. 2015 Feb;77(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0741-z. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
2
Epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy with epididymoplasty: preservation of esthetics and body image.保留附睾的双侧单纯睾丸切除术联合附睾成形术:保留美观和身体形象。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):893-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000172567.09442.b0.
3
Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.比较附睾下睾丸切除术与传统睾丸切除术治疗前列腺转移性癌的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Indian J Surg. 2011 Jun;73(3):175-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0207-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
4
Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.前列腺癌根治性睾丸切除术后的满意度和生殖器感知:手术技术重要吗?一项随机试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Aug;53(8):1583-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02849-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
5
Surgical androgen deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer in patients of African descent: comparison of biochemical efficacy of bilateral total and subcapsular orchidectomy.在非洲裔患者的晚期前列腺癌中进行手术去势雄激素治疗:双侧全切除术和被膜下切除术的生化疗效比较。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Mar;23(1):483-491. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.50.
6
Subepididymal orchiectomy: the acceptable alternative.附睾下睾丸切除术:可接受的替代方案。
J Urol. 1990 Oct;144(4):942-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39626-x.
7
Bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy versus bilateral total orchiectomy: Comparison of the quality of life post-orchiectomy.双侧睾丸包膜下切除术与双侧睾丸全切术:睾丸切除术后生活质量的比较。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018 Jan-Mar;25(1):43-47. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_169_17.
8
Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists are Superior to Subcapsular Orchiectomy in Lowering Testosterone Levels of Men with Prostate Cancer: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂在降低前列腺癌男性睾酮水平方面优于包膜下睾丸切除术:一项随机临床试验的结果
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1441-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Plasma androgen levels after subcapsular orchiectomy or estrogen treatment for prostatic carcinoma.前列腺癌行包膜下睾丸切除术后或雌激素治疗后的血浆雄激素水平。
Prostate. 1982;3(2):115-21. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990030203.
10
Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects.包膜下睾丸切除术与全睾丸切除术和 LHRH 类似物治疗激素敏感转移性前列腺癌:心理社会影响评估的不同视角。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4313-4326. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05266-2. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cosmetic Appeal, HRQoL, and Effectiveness of Simple and Pseudotesticular Techniques of Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌中单纯性与假睾丸切除术的外观吸引力、健康相关生活质量及有效性
Prostate Cancer. 2021 Nov 26;2021:9968570. doi: 10.1155/2021/9968570. eCollection 2021.
2
Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.前列腺癌根治性睾丸切除术后的满意度和生殖器感知:手术技术重要吗?一项随机试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Aug;53(8):1583-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02849-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy with epididymoplasty: preservation of esthetics and body image.保留附睾的双侧单纯睾丸切除术联合附睾成形术:保留美观和身体形象。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):893-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000172567.09442.b0.
2
The fate of the medically castrated testis: expectation versus reality.
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1042-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135831.19857.5c.
3
Autologous tunica vaginalis and subcapsular orchiectomy: a hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.自体睾丸鞘膜及睾丸白膜下切除术:一种前列腺癌的激素疗法。
J Androl. 2004 May-Jun;25(3):375-81. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02803.x.
4
Extraparenchymal Leydig-like cells: observations following subcapsular orchiectomy.实质外类睾丸间质细胞:包膜下睾丸切除术的观察结果
J Urol. 1959 Jul;82(1):145-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)65846-4.
5
Quality-of-life outcomes after primary androgen deprivation therapy: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.初次雄激素剥夺治疗后的生活质量结果:前列腺癌结局研究的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 1;19(17):3750-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.17.3750.
6
Medical versus surgical androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer: a 10-year longitudinal cost study.前列腺癌的药物与手术去势雄激素抑制治疗:一项为期10年的纵向成本研究。
J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):104-7. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00026.
7
Cosmetic orchiectomy using pedicled fibro-fatty tissue graft for prostate cancer: a new approach.使用带蒂纤维脂肪组织移植进行前列腺癌的美容性睾丸切除术:一种新方法。
Eur Urol. 1998 Sep;34(3):210-5. doi: 10.1159/000019715.
8
Androgen deprivation therapy for asymptomatic advanced prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era: a national survey of urologist beliefs and practices.前列腺特异性抗原时代无症状晚期前列腺癌的雄激素剥夺治疗:一项关于泌尿科医生信念与实践的全国性调查。
J Urol. 1998 Jun;159(6):1993-6; discussion 1996-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63223-3.
9
Casodex (bicalutamide) 150-mg monotherapy compared with castration in patients with previously untreated nonmetastatic prostate cancer: results from two multicenter randomized trials at a median follow-up of 4 years.与去势治疗相比,醋酸阿比特龙(比卡鲁胺)150毫克单药治疗既往未接受过治疗的非转移性前列腺癌患者:两项多中心随机试验的结果,中位随访4年。
Urology. 1998 Mar;51(3):389-96. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00004-1.
10
Subcapsular orchiectomy with intracapsular testicular prosthesis for metastatic prostate carcinoma.采用囊内睾丸假体的包膜下睾丸切除术治疗转移性前列腺癌。
Urology. 1984 Jul;24(1):38-40. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90384-4.