• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌根治性睾丸切除术后的满意度和生殖器感知:手术技术重要吗?一项随机试验。

Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India.

Consultant Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Shrimann Superspeciality Hospital, Jalandhar, 144012, India.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Aug;53(8):1583-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02849-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-021-02849-z
PMID:33851360
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bilateral extracapsular or total orchiectomy (BEO) for prostate cancer is presumed to have psychological consequences after the surgery due to perception of an empty scrotum. Bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy (BSO) was designed to preserve perception of palpable testes. We compared the patients' satisfaction and genital perception following BEO and BSO.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prostate cancer patients eligible for androgen deprivation therapy who opted for orchiectomy were enrolled in prospective randomized study. Patients with bleeding disorder or uncorrected coagulopathy, poor performance score, and psychiatric problems were excluded. Outlook to life and own health in-general, overall satisfaction to the procedure and genital perception was evaluated using modified Fugl-Meyer questionnaire (FMQ) which was administered before and after 3 months of the surgery. Patients were randomized to BEO and BSO groups at the time of surgery using block randomization. Primary outcome was to compare the genital perception of testicular loss and patients' satisfaction to BSO and BEO. Secondary outcomes included testosterone and PSA control, operative time, and complications.

RESULTS

Total 35 patients were enrolled in each group which was comparable. There was no difference in PSA control at 3 months. Mean operative time and blood loss were significantly lesser in BEO group. FMQ score at 3 months did not show significant difference. Majority of the patients in both groups were satisfied with procedure and the aesthetic value of scrotum after surgery. However, 84% in BSO group did not feel that testes were removed on self-examination, as compared to 28% in BEO group. Majority patients in both groups did not report physical or psychological discomfort from change in scrotal content.

CONCLUSIONS

Results showed that patients' satisfaction and genital perception following BSO and BEO were similar. Feeling of remaining intrascrotal contents after BSO did not had added psychological advantage in terms of perception of genitalia.

摘要

目的

由于对空阴囊的感知,前列腺癌患者行双侧囊外或全睾丸切除术(BEO)后,推测会产生心理后果。双侧睾丸被膜下切除术(BSO)旨在保留对可触及睾丸的感知。我们比较了 BEO 和 BSO 后患者的满意度和生殖器感知。

材料和方法

选择适合雄激素剥夺治疗且选择睾丸切除术的前列腺癌患者参加前瞻性随机研究。排除有出血障碍或未纠正的凝血障碍、表现评分差和精神问题的患者。使用改良 Fugl-Meyer 问卷(FMQ)评估手术前 3 个月后的生活前景和一般健康状况、对手术过程的总体满意度和生殖器感知。患者在手术时使用区组随机化分为 BEO 和 BSO 组。主要结局是比较睾丸丧失的生殖器感知和患者对 BSO 和 BEO 的满意度。次要结局包括睾酮和 PSA 控制、手术时间和并发症。

结果

每组各有 35 例患者入组,两组具有可比性。3 个月时 PSA 控制无差异。BEO 组的平均手术时间和失血量明显较少。3 个月时 FMQ 评分无显著差异。两组大多数患者对手术过程和手术后阴囊的美学价值感到满意。然而,与 BEO 组的 28%相比,BSO 组有 84%的患者在自我检查时感觉不到睾丸被切除。两组大多数患者均未报告因阴囊内容物改变而出现身体或心理不适。

结论

结果表明,BSO 和 BEO 后患者的满意度和生殖器感知相似。BSO 后残留的鞘内内容物感觉并未在生殖器感知方面带来额外的心理优势。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction and genital perception after orchiectomy for prostate cancer: does the technique matter? A randomized trial.前列腺癌根治性睾丸切除术后的满意度和生殖器感知:手术技术重要吗?一项随机试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Aug;53(8):1583-1589. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-02849-z. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy with epididymoplasty: preservation of esthetics and body image.保留附睾的双侧单纯睾丸切除术联合附睾成形术:保留美观和身体形象。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):893-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000172567.09442.b0.
3
Bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy versus bilateral total orchiectomy: Comparison of the quality of life post-orchiectomy.双侧睾丸包膜下切除术与双侧睾丸全切术:睾丸切除术后生活质量的比较。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018 Jan-Mar;25(1):43-47. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_169_17.
4
Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects.包膜下睾丸切除术与全睾丸切除术和 LHRH 类似物治疗激素敏感转移性前列腺癌:心理社会影响评估的不同视角。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4313-4326. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05266-2. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Autologous tunica vaginalis and subcapsular orchiectomy: a hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.自体睾丸鞘膜及睾丸白膜下切除术:一种前列腺癌的激素疗法。
J Androl. 2004 May-Jun;25(3):375-81. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.2004.tb02803.x.
6
Subcapsular versus total orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: a randomized trial.晚期前列腺癌治疗中包膜下睾丸切除术与根治性睾丸切除术的比较:一项随机试验
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(6):464-7. doi: 10.1080/00365590500220230.
7
Cosmetic orchiectomy using pedicled fibro-fatty tissue graft for prostate cancer: a new approach.使用带蒂纤维脂肪组织移植进行前列腺癌的美容性睾丸切除术:一种新方法。
Eur Urol. 1998 Sep;34(3):210-5. doi: 10.1159/000019715.
8
Comparison of subcapsular and total orchiectomy for treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.包膜下睾丸切除术与根治性睾丸切除术治疗转移性前列腺癌的比较。
Urology. 1996 Mar;47(3):402-4. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80460-9.
9
Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.比较附睾下睾丸切除术与传统睾丸切除术治疗前列腺转移性癌的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Indian J Surg. 2011 Jun;73(3):175-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0207-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
10
Psychosocial implications and the duality of life outcomes for patients with prostate carcinoma after bilateral orchiectomy.
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2012;33(8):761-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Simple and Epididymal-Sparing Orchiectomy for Surgical Castration in Stage IV Prostate Cancer.用于IV期前列腺癌手术去势的简单保留附睾睾丸切除术
Ochsner J. 2024 Fall;24(3):171-178. doi: 10.31486/toj.24.0013.
2
Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists versus orchiectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer: A systematic review.促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂与睾丸切除术治疗前列腺癌的系统评价。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 6;14:1131715. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1131715. eCollection 2023.
3
Cosmetic Appeal, HRQoL, and Effectiveness of Simple and Pseudotesticular Techniques of Orchidectomy in Prostate Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects.包膜下睾丸切除术与全睾丸切除术和 LHRH 类似物治疗激素敏感转移性前列腺癌:心理社会影响评估的不同视角。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Sep;28(9):4313-4326. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05266-2. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy versus bilateral total orchiectomy: Comparison of the quality of life post-orchiectomy.双侧睾丸包膜下切除术与双侧睾丸全切术:睾丸切除术后生活质量的比较。
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018 Jan-Mar;25(1):43-47. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_169_17.
3
前列腺癌中单纯性与假睾丸切除术的外观吸引力、健康相关生活质量及有效性
Prostate Cancer. 2021 Nov 26;2021:9968570. doi: 10.1155/2021/9968570. eCollection 2021.
Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists are Superior to Subcapsular Orchiectomy in Lowering Testosterone Levels of Men with Prostate Cancer: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial.
促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂在降低前列腺癌男性睾酮水平方面优于包膜下睾丸切除术:一项随机临床试验的结果
J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1441-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.12.003. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
4
Can Subepididymal Orchiectomy Re-emerge as the Treatment of Choice in Patients with Advanced Prostatic Carcinoma?附睾下睾丸切除术能否再度成为晚期前列腺癌患者的首选治疗方法?
Indian J Surg. 2015 Feb;77(1):23-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0741-z. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
5
Prospective randomised controlled trial comparing sub-epididymal orchiectomy versus conventional orchiectomy in metastatic carcinoma of prostate.比较附睾下睾丸切除术与传统睾丸切除术治疗前列腺转移性癌的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Indian J Surg. 2011 Jun;73(3):175-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0207-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
6
Subcapsular orchiectomy in the primary therapy of patients with bone metastasis in advanced prostate cancer: an anachronistic intervention?晚期前列腺癌骨转移患者初始治疗中的包膜下睾丸切除术:一种过时的干预措施?
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:190624. doi: 10.1155/2012/190624. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
7
Decreasing use of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in the United States is Independent of Reimbursement Changes: A Medicare and Veterans Health Administration claims analysis.在美国,促黄体生成素释放激素激动剂的使用减少与报销变化无关:一项医疗保险和退伍军人健康管理局索赔分析。
J Urol. 2009 Jul;182(1):255-60; discussion 261. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.141. Epub 2009 May 17.
8
Epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy with epididymoplasty: preservation of esthetics and body image.保留附睾的双侧单纯睾丸切除术联合附睾成形术:保留美观和身体形象。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):893-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000172567.09442.b0.
9
Decline in bilateral orchiectomy for prostate cancer in Olmsted county, Minnesota, 1956-2000.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Dec;76(12):1199-203. doi: 10.4065/76.12.1199.
10
Cost comparison of orchiectomy and leuprolide in metastatic prostate cancer.睾丸切除术与亮丙瑞林治疗转移性前列腺癌的成本比较
J Urol. 1998 Dec;160(6 Pt 2):2446-9. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199812020-00015.