Karaca A Serdar, Ersoy Omer Faik, Ozkan Namik, Yerdel Mehmet Ali
Departments of General Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Departments of General Surgery, Gaziosmanpasa University Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Turkey.
Indian J Surg. 2015 Feb;77(1):28-33. doi: 10.1007/s12262-013-0809-4. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
Tension-free repairs are performed commonly in inguinal hernia operations. The objective of the present study is to compare the outcomes of three different tension-free repair methods known as Lichtenstein, Rutkow-Robbins, and Gilbert double layer. One-hundred and fifty patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia were randomly split into three groups. The comparisons across groups were carried out in terms of operation length, postoperative pain, femoral vein flow velocity, early and late complications, recurrence rates, length of hospital stay, time required to return to work, and cost analysis. No difference was found between the groups regarding age, gender, type and classification of hernia, postoperative pain, and late complications (p > 0.05). Operation length was 53.70 ± 12.32 min in the Lichtenstein group, 44.29 ± 12.37 min in the Rutkow-Robbins group, and 45.21 ± 14.36 min in the Gilbert group (p < 0.05). Mean preoperative and postoperative femoral vein flow velocity values were 13.88 ± 2.237 and 13.42 ± 2.239 cm/s for Lichtenstein group, 12.64 ± 2.98 and 12.16 ± 2.736 cm/s for Rutkow-Robbins group, and 16.02 ± 3.19 and 15.52 ± 3.358 cm/s for the Gilbert group, respectively. Statistical difference was found between all the groups (p < 0.001). However, no difference was determined between the groups regarding the decrease rates (p = 0.977). Among early complications, hematoma was observed in one (2 %) patient of Lichtenstein group, five (10 %) patients of Rutkow-Robbins group, and three (6 %) patients of Gilbert group (p = 0.033). Cost analysis produced the following results for Lichtenstein, Rutkow-Robbins, and Gilbert groups: US $157.94 ± 50.05, $481.57 ± 11.32, and $501.51 ± 73.59, respectively (p < 0.001). Lichtenstein operation was found to be more advantageous compared with the other techniques in terms of cost analysis as well as having unaffected femoral blood flow. Therefore, we believe that Lichtenstein repair is still the most appropriate surgical option in patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia.
腹股沟疝手术中常进行无张力修补。本研究的目的是比较三种不同的无张力修补方法,即李金斯坦(Lichtenstein)法、鲁特科夫 - 罗宾斯(Rutkow - Robbins)法和吉尔伯特双层(Gilbert double layer)法的效果。150例诊断为腹股沟疝的患者被随机分为三组。对三组患者在手术时长、术后疼痛、股静脉血流速度、早期和晚期并发症、复发率、住院时间、恢复工作所需时间以及成本分析等方面进行了比较。在年龄、性别、疝的类型和分级、术后疼痛及晚期并发症方面,三组之间未发现差异(p>0.05)。李金斯坦组的手术时长为53.70±12.32分钟,鲁特科夫 - 罗宾斯组为44.29±12.37分钟,吉尔伯特组为45.21±14.36分钟(p<0.05)。李金斯坦组术前和术后股静脉血流速度的平均值分别为13.88±2.237厘米/秒和13.42±2.239厘米/秒,鲁特科夫 - 罗宾斯组分别为12.64±2.98厘米/秒和12.16±2.736厘米/秒,吉尔伯特组分别为16.02±3.19厘米/秒和和15.52±3.358厘米/秒。所有组之间均存在统计学差异(p<0.001)。然而,在血流速度下降率方面,三组之间未发现差异(p = 0.977)。在早期并发症中,李金斯坦组有1例(2%)患者出现血肿,鲁特科夫 - 罗宾斯组有5例(10%)患者出现血肿,吉尔伯特组有3例(6%)患者出现血肿(p = 0.033)。成本分析结果显示,李金斯坦组、鲁特科夫 - 罗宾斯组和吉尔伯特组的成本分别为157.94±50.05美元、481.57±11.32美元和501.51±73.59美元(p<0.001)。在成本分析以及对股血流无影响方面,发现李金斯坦手术比其他技术更具优势。因此,我们认为李金斯坦修补术仍是诊断为腹股沟疝患者最合适的手术选择。