Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Feb 23;10:9. doi: 10.1186/s13006-015-0034-9. eCollection 2015.
This introduction to a special issue on the economics of breastfeeding draws attention to the lack of economic justice for women. Human milk is being bought and sold. Commodifying and marketing human milk and breastfeeding risk reinforcing social and gender economic inequities. Yet there are potential benefits for breastfeeding, and some of the world's poorest women might profit. How can we improve on the present situation where everyone except the woman who donates her milk benefits? Breastfeeding is a global food production system with unsurpassed capacity to promote children's food security and maternal and child health, but it is side-lined by trade negotiators who seek instead to expand world markets for cow's milk-based formula. Regulators focus on potential risks of feeding donated human milk, rather than on health risks of exposing infants and young children to highly processed bovine milk. Similarly, policymakers aspire to provide universal health care access that may be unaffordable when two thirds of the world's children are not optimally nourished in infancy, resulting in a global double burden of infectious and chronic disease. Universal breastfeeding requires greater commitment of resources, but such investment remains lacking despite the cost effectiveness of breastfeeding protection, support and promotion in and beyond health services. Women invest substantially in breastfeeding but current policy - epitomised by the G20 approach to the 'gender gap' - fails to acknowledge the economic value of this unpaid care work. Economic incentives for mothers to optimally breastfeed are dwarfed by health system and commercial incentives promoting formula feeding and by government fiscal policies which ignore the resulting economic costs. 'The market' fails to protect breastfeeding, because market prices give the wrong signals. An economic approach to the problem of premature weaning from optimal breastfeeding may help prioritise global maternity protection as the foundation for sustainable development of human capital and labour productivity. It would remove fiscal subsidies for breast milk substitutes, tax their sale to recoup health system costs, and penalise their free supply, promotion and distribution. By removing widespread incentives for premature weaning, the resources would be available for the world to invest more in breastfeeding.
这篇关于母乳喂养经济学的特刊引言提请人们注意妇女缺乏经济公正待遇的问题。人乳正在被买卖。将人乳商品化和市场化以及母乳喂养可能会加剧社会和性别经济不平等。然而,母乳喂养有潜在的好处,而且世界上一些最贫穷的妇女可能会从中受益。我们如何才能改善目前这种除了捐赠母乳的妇女之外人人受益的状况?母乳喂养是一种全球性的食品生产系统,具有无与伦比的能力,可以促进儿童食品安全以及母婴健康,但它却被寻求扩大牛奶配方奶粉世界市场的贸易谈判者所忽视。监管机构关注的是用捐赠母乳喂养的潜在风险,而不是用高度加工的牛奶喂养婴儿和幼儿的健康风险。同样,政策制定者渴望提供普遍的医疗保健服务,但当世界上三分之二的儿童在婴儿期得不到最佳营养时,这种愿望可能无法实现,从而导致全球传染病和慢性病的双重负担。普及母乳喂养需要更多的资源投入,但尽管在卫生服务内外保护、支持和促进母乳喂养具有成本效益,但这种投资仍然不足。妇女在母乳喂养方面投入了大量资金,但当前的政策——以 20 国集团(G20)解决“性别差距”的方法为代表——未能承认这种无报酬的护理工作的经济价值。鼓励母亲最佳母乳喂养的经济激励措施与促进配方奶喂养的卫生系统和商业激励措施以及忽视由此产生的经济成本的政府财政政策相比相形见绌。“市场”未能保护母乳喂养,因为市场价格发出了错误的信号。一种解决过早断奶问题的经济学方法可能有助于将全球产妇保护作为人力资本和劳动生产率可持续发展的基础。它将取消对母乳代用品的财政补贴,对其销售征税以收回卫生系统成本,并对其免费供应、促销和分配进行处罚。通过消除过早断奶的广泛激励措施,世界将有更多的资源投资于母乳喂养。