Suppr超能文献

罗氏COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1检测版本1.0与版本2.0在HIV-1病毒载量定量方面的比较。

Comparison of the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test v1.0 with v2.0 in HIV-1 viral load quantification.

作者信息

Tung Yi-Ching, Ke Liang-Yin, Lu Po-Liang, Lin Kuei-Hsiang, Lee Su-Chen, Lin Yi-Ying, Chou Li-Chiu, Tsai Wen-Chan

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Graduate Institute, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Laboratory Medicine Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2015 Apr;31(4):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

Abstract

Roche modified the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) test version 1.0 (CAP/CTM v1.0), resulting in the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 test version 2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CAP/CTM v2.0 and to compare this performance with that of the CAP/CTM v1.0. The study was conducted in a small local study group in Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. A total of 86 plasma samples from HIV-1-seropositive patients were tested using the two assays. The correlation and concordance of results between the two assays were calculated. The CAP/CTM v2.0 generated higher values than did the CAP/CTM v1.0, and five samples (5.8%) yielded a difference of > 1 log10 copies/mL. In addition, our data show that CAP/CTM v1.0 and CAP/CTM v2.0 yielded relatively consistent values for 23 samples with low viral loads (< 200 copies/mL). Furthermore, when viral loads were in a medium range (2-5 log10 copies/mL), the results of the two assays were more compatible. This study shows a good correlation between CAP/CTM v1.0 and v2.0 in HIV-1 viral load measurement. Further attention must be paid to those cases in which measured viral loads present larger differences between the two assays.

摘要

罗氏公司对COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan 1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)检测版本1.0(CAP/CTM v1.0)进行了改进,从而产生了COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1检测版本2.0(CAP/CTM v2.0)。本研究的目的是评估CAP/CTM v2.0的性能,并将该性能与CAP/CTM v1.0的性能进行比较。该研究在台湾高雄市高雄医学大学医院的一个小型本地研究组中进行。使用这两种检测方法对86份来自HIV-1血清阳性患者的血浆样本进行了检测。计算了两种检测方法之间结果的相关性和一致性。CAP/CTM v2.0产生的值高于CAP/CTM v1.0,并且有5个样本(5.8%)的差异>1 log10拷贝/毫升。此外,我们的数据表明,对于23份病毒载量较低(<200拷贝/毫升)的样本,CAP/CTM v1.0和CAP/CTM v2.0产生的值相对一致。此外,当病毒载量处于中等范围(2 - 5 log10拷贝/毫升)时,两种检测方法的结果更具可比性。本研究表明,在HIV-1病毒载量测量中,CAP/CTM v1.0和v2.0之间具有良好的相关性。必须进一步关注那些两种检测方法测得的病毒载量存在较大差异的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验