Suppr超能文献

介入神经放射学的最佳麻醉深度:浅麻醉与深麻醉的比较。

The optimal anesthetic depth for interventional neuroradiology: comparisons between light anesthesia and deep anesthesia.

作者信息

Jung Yoo Sun, Han Ye-Reum, Choi Eun-Su, Kim Byung-Gun, Park Hee-Pyoung, Hwang Jung-Won, Jeon Young-Tae

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr;68(2):148-52. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.148. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine the optimal anesthetic depth for the maintenance and recovery in interventional neuroradiology.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology were randomly allocated to light anesthesia (n = 44) or deep anesthesia (n = 44) groups based on the value of the bispectral index (BIS). Anesthesia was induced with propofol, alfentanil, and rocuronium and maintained with 1-3% sevoflurane. The concentration of sevoflurane was titrated to maintain BIS at 40-49 (deep anesthesia group) or 50-59 (light anesthesia group). Phenylephrine was used to maintain the mean arterial pressure within 20% of preinduction values. Recovery times were recorded.

RESULTS

The light anesthesia group had a more rapid recovery to spontaneous ventilation, eye opening, extubation, and orientation (4.1 ± 2.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.8 min, 6.9 ± 3.2 min vs. 9.1 ± 3.2 min, 8.2 ± 3.1 min vs. 10.7 ± 3.3 min, 10.0 ± 3.9 min vs. 12.9 ± 5.5 min, all P < 0.01) compared to the deep anesthesia group. The use of phenylephrine was significantly increased in the deep anesthesia group (768 ± 184 vs. 320 ± 82 µg, P < 0.01). More patients moved during the procedure in the light anesthesia group (6/44 [14%] vs. 0/44 [0%], P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

BIS values between 50 and 59 for interventional neuroradiology were associated with a more rapid recovery and favorable hemodynamic response, but also with more patient movement. We suggest that maintaining BIS values between 40 and 49 is preferable for the prevention of patient movement during anesthesia for interventional neuroradiology.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定介入神经放射学中维持和恢复阶段的最佳麻醉深度。

方法

88例接受介入神经放射学治疗的患者根据脑电双频指数(BIS)值被随机分为浅麻醉组(n = 44)和深麻醉组(n = 44)。采用丙泊酚、阿芬太尼和罗库溴铵诱导麻醉,并用1% - 3%七氟醚维持麻醉。七氟醚浓度进行滴定,使BIS维持在40 - 49(深麻醉组)或50 - 59(浅麻醉组)。使用去氧肾上腺素使平均动脉压维持在诱导前值的20%以内。记录恢复时间。

结果

与深麻醉组相比,浅麻醉组恢复自主通气、睁眼、拔管和定向的速度更快(分别为4.1 ± 2.3分钟对5.3 ± 1.8分钟、6.9 ± 3.2分钟对9.1 ± 3.2分钟、8.2 ± 3.1分钟对10.7 ± 3.3分钟、10.0 ± 3.9分钟对12.9 ± 5.5分钟,均P < 0.01)。深麻醉组去氧肾上腺素的使用量显著增加(768 ± 184微克对320 ± 82微克,P < 0.01)。浅麻醉组在手术过程中有更多患者出现肢体移动(6/44 [14%]对0/44 [0%],P = 0.026)。

结论

介入神经放射学中BIS值在50至59之间与更快的恢复和良好的血流动力学反应相关,但也与更多的患者肢体移动有关。我们建议,在介入神经放射学麻醉期间,将BIS值维持在40至49之间更有利于防止患者肢体移动。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验