Suppr超能文献

唇腭裂患者治疗后 50 余年的青年面容美学

Facial Aesthetics in Young Adults after Cleft Lip and Palate Treatment over Five Decades.

机构信息

Clinic for Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Applied Psychology, Health, Development, Enhancement, Intervention, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 20;7(1):15864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16249-w.

Abstract

Cleft Lip and Palate (CLP) - a common facial malformation in newborns - is typically corrected by surgical intervention to allow for normal speech development, psychosocial adjustment, and facial attractiveness. The long term treatment outcome can be evaluated after a number of years, possibly in adulthood. We investigated the aesthetics of the nasolabial region by subjective ratings. To compare various surgical approaches we recruited 12 raters to evaluate 429 patients. Expert and lay raters judged photographs from patients, who have completed treatment with one of three different surgical strategies performed in our institution over 50 years. Facial photographs were cropped, presented to the raters in a randomized sequence, and judged by the raters on a 5 point Likert scale. The subjective ratings between the raters revealed a fair to substantial inter-rater reliability. The average ratings of the surgical outcome improved continuously over the investigated 5 decades. Despite possible differences between raters and rater groups this overall result was consistently seen in the gender groups (male/female), or expertise related groups (expert/lay). Our analysis revealed that patients with bilateral CLP scored worse than patients with unilateral CLP when treated in the fifties; more recently treated patients of both groups scored similarly.

摘要

唇腭裂(CLP)- 一种常见的新生儿面部畸形 - 通常通过手术干预进行矫正,以允许正常的言语发展、社会心理调整和面部吸引力。长期治疗结果可以在数年之后,可能在成年后进行评估。我们通过主观评分来研究鼻唇区域的美学。为了比较各种手术方法,我们招募了 12 名评估员来评估 429 名患者。专家和非专业评估员评估了来自患者的照片,这些患者接受了我们机构在过去 50 年中采用的三种不同手术策略之一的治疗。面部照片被裁剪,以随机顺序呈现给评估员,并由评估员在 5 点李克特量表上进行评估。评估员之间的主观评分显示出相当大的公平到相当大的评估者间可靠性。手术结果的平均评分在调查的 5 个十年中持续提高。尽管评估员和评估员组之间可能存在差异,但在性别组(男性/女性)或专业相关组(专家/非专业)中始终可以看到这一总体结果。我们的分析表明,五十年代接受治疗的双侧 CLP 患者的评分比单侧 CLP 患者差;最近接受治疗的两组患者的评分相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验