Suppr超能文献

休闲时间身体活动与死亡率:剂量反应关系的详细汇总分析

Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.

作者信息

Arem Hannah, Moore Steven C, Patel Alpa, Hartge Patricia, Berrington de Gonzalez Amy, Visvanathan Kala, Campbell Peter T, Freedman Michal, Weiderpass Elisabete, Adami Hans Olov, Linet Martha S, Lee I-Min, Matthews Charles E

机构信息

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans recommended a minimum of 75 vigorous-intensity or 150 moderate-intensity minutes per week (7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week) of aerobic activity for substantial health benefit and suggested additional benefits by doing more than double this amount. However, the upper limit of longevity benefit or possible harm with more physical activity is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the dose-response association between leisure time physical activity and mortality and define the upper limit of benefit or harm associated with increased levels of physical activity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We pooled data from 6 studies in the National Cancer Institute Cohort Consortium (baseline 1992-2003). Population-based prospective cohorts in the United States and Europe with self-reported physical activity were analyzed in 2014. A total of 661,137 men and women (median age, 62 years; range, 21-98 years) and 116,686 deaths were included. We used Cox proportional hazards regression with cohort stratification to generate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Median follow-up time was 14.2 years.

EXPOSURES

Leisure time moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The upper limit of mortality benefit from high levels of leisure time physical activity.

RESULTS

Compared with individuals reporting no leisure time physical activity, we observed a 20% lower mortality risk among those performing less than the recommended minimum of 7.5 metabolic-equivalent hours per week (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.78-0.82]), a 31% lower risk at 1 to 2 times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70]), and a 37% lower risk at 2 to 3 times the minimum (HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.62-0.65]). An upper threshold for mortality benefit occurred at 3 to 5 times the physical activity recommendation (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.59-0.62]); however, compared with the recommended minimum, the additional benefit was modest (31% vs 39%). There was no evidence of harm at 10 or more times the recommended minimum (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.78]). A similar dose-response relationship was observed for mortality due to cardiovascular disease and to cancer.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Meeting the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans minimum by either moderate- or vigorous-intensity activities was associated with nearly the maximum longevity benefit. We observed a benefit threshold at approximately 3 to 5 times the recommended leisure time physical activity minimum and no excess risk at 10 or more times the minimum. In regard to mortality, health care professionals should encourage inactive adults to perform leisure time physical activity and do not need to discourage adults who already participate in high-activity levels.

摘要

重要性

《2008年美国体育活动指南》建议,每周进行至少75分钟的高强度或150分钟的中等强度有氧运动(每周7.5个代谢当量小时),以获得显著的健康益处,并指出运动量超过此量的两倍可能会带来更多益处。然而,体育活动量增加对寿命的益处上限或可能的危害尚不清楚。

目的

量化休闲时间体育活动与死亡率之间的剂量反应关系,并确定与体育活动量增加相关的益处或危害上限。

设计、背景和参与者:我们汇总了美国国立癌症研究所队列联盟6项研究的数据(基线时间为1992 - 2003年)。2014年对美国和欧洲基于人群的前瞻性队列进行了分析,这些队列中的个体自我报告了体育活动情况。共纳入661137名男性和女性(年龄中位数为62岁;范围为21 - 98岁),其中有116686人死亡。我们使用队列分层的Cox比例风险回归来生成多变量调整后的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。中位随访时间为14.2年。

暴露因素

休闲时间的中等至高强度体育活动。

主要结局和测量指标

高水平休闲时间体育活动对死亡率益处的上限。

结果

与报告无休闲时间体育活动的个体相比,我们观察到,每周体育活动量低于建议最低量7.5个代谢当量小时的人群,其死亡风险降低了20%(HR,0.80 [95% CI,0.78 - 0.82]);体育活动量为建议最低量1至2倍的人群,死亡风险降低了31%(HR,0.

相似文献

1
Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0533.
3
Long-Term Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intensity and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: A Prospective Cohort of US Adults.
Circulation. 2022 Aug 16;146(7):523-534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.058162. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Association of Leisure-Time Physical Activity With Risk of 26 Types of Cancer in 1.44 Million Adults.
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jun 1;176(6):816-25. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1548.
7
Amount and Intensity of Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Lower Cancer Risk.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):686-697. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02407. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
8
Association of Physical Activity Intensity With Mortality: A National Cohort Study of 403 681 US Adults.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):203-211. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.6331.
9
Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Mortality in CKD: A 1999-2012 NHANES Analysis.
Am J Nephrol. 2020;51(11):919-929. doi: 10.1159/000511685. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

3
The interplay between physical exercise and autophagy signaling in brain health, neurodegenerative diseases and aging.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jul 29;17:1579208. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1579208. eCollection 2025.
4
Association between physical activity level and cardiovascular disease: An empirical analysis based on CHARLS data in 2018.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0329232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329232. eCollection 2025.
7
How digital health literacy shapes health: Mediating role of physical activity and heterogeneity in China.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 15;20(7):e0328101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328101. eCollection 2025.
8
Leg vascular function with advancing age in men: the impact of physical activity and endurance exercise training.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2025 Aug 1;139(2):473-481. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00784.2024. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
9
Walking as a viable alternative to moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for improving cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease patients.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Jun 9;26:200452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200452. eCollection 2025 Sep.
10
Epidemiology and Cardiovascular Benefits of Physical Activity and Exercise.
Circ Res. 2025 Jul 7;137(2):120-138. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.125.325526. Epub 2025 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
U.S. Adults' Participation in Specific Activities: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System--2011.
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jun 16;12 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-10. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0521.
3
Atrial fibrillation is associated with different levels of physical activity levels at different ages in men.
Heart. 2014 Jul;100(13):1037-42. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305304. Epub 2014 May 14.
4
Mortality of French participants in the Tour de France (1947-2012).
Eur Heart J. 2013 Oct;34(40):3145-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht347. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
5
Risk of arrhythmias in 52 755 long-distance cross-country skiers: a cohort study.
Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(47):3624-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht188. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
6
Run for your life ... at a comfortable speed and not too far.
Heart. 2013 Apr;99(8):516-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302886. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
7
Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
8
Potential adverse cardiovascular effects from excessive endurance exercise.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jun;87(6):587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.04.005.
9
Minimum amount of physical activity for reduced mortality and extended life expectancy: a prospective cohort study.
Lancet. 2011 Oct 1;378(9798):1244-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60749-6. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
10
Ultraviolet exposure and mortality among women in Sweden.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Apr;20(4):683-90. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0982. Epub 2011 Feb 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验