• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隔离与情境因素的重要性:对一个创新项目的重新审视

Seclusion and the importance of contextual factors: An innovation project revisited.

作者信息

Boumans Christien E, Egger Jos I M, Bouts Richard A, Hutschemaekers Giel J M

机构信息

Mental Health Institute Oost Brabant, Boekel, The Netherlands; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Centre of Excellence for Neuropsychiatry, Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Pompe Institute for Forensic Psychiatry, Pro Persona, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;41:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.001
PMID:25846558
Abstract

Variation in seclusion rates between psychiatric facilities cannot be adequately explained by patient characteristics alone and there is a growing awareness of the influence of 'cultural' and staff factors on the use of seclusion. In this study, staff variables as well as seclusion parameters were investigated during the implementation of an innovation project, against the background of an institutional program to reduce the use of coercive measures. The results demonstrate the impact of confidence within the team, staffing level and communication with the patient on nurses' decisions on seclusion. The importance of the organizational context is further illustrated by the negative effects of organizational instability on nurses' attitudes and decision making with respect to seclusion, and on seclusion rates. A reduction in the use of seclusion was achieved after the implementation of the innovation project; however, during a period of organizational turmoil, the work engagement scores of staff decreased and the use of seclusion increased. The results of this study show the vulnerability of innovations within the continuously changing organizational context of mental health care.

摘要

精神科机构之间隔离率的差异不能仅由患者特征充分解释,人们越来越意识到“文化”和工作人员因素对隔离使用的影响。在本研究中,在一项旨在减少强制手段使用的机构项目背景下,在创新项目实施期间对工作人员变量以及隔离参数进行了调查。结果表明团队内部的信心、人员配备水平以及与患者的沟通对护士关于隔离的决策有影响。组织不稳定对护士关于隔离的态度和决策以及隔离率产生负面影响,进一步说明了组织背景的重要性。创新项目实施后,隔离的使用有所减少;然而,在组织动荡期间,工作人员的工作投入得分下降,隔离的使用增加。本研究结果表明,在不断变化的精神卫生保健组织背景下,创新具有脆弱性。

相似文献

1
Seclusion and the importance of contextual factors: An innovation project revisited.隔离与情境因素的重要性:对一个创新项目的重新审视
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Jul-Aug;41:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
2
Professionals' attitudes after a seclusion reduction program: anything changed?专业人员在隔离减少项目后的态度:有变化吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2013 Mar;84(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11126-012-9222-6.
3
Nurses' decision on seclusion: patient characteristics, contextual factors and reflexivity in teams.护士对隔离的决策:团队中的患者特征、情境因素和反思。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Apr;19(3):264-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01777.x. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
4
Staff perceptions and organizational factors as predictors of seclusion and restraint on psychiatric wards.工作人员的看法和组织因素是预测精神科病房禁闭和约束的因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 May;62(5):484-91. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0484.
5
Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: a review of the literature.护士对隔离使用的态度:文献综述。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;19(3):162-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2010.00669.x.
6
Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain?不同入院病房的隔离率差异:患者构成能解释吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2013 Mar;84(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11126-012-9225-3.
7
The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective.精神疾病患者与社会排斥:从患者视角对隔离使用情况的批判性审视。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004 Sep;25(6):559-78. doi: 10.1080/01612840490472101.
8
Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.监测强制性措施使用情况的方法学问题。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.008. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
9
Association of empathy of nursing staff with reduction of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric inpatient care.精神科住院护理中护理人员的同理心与减少隔离和约束的关联。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):251-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200531.
10
The influence of staffing levels on the use of seclusion.人员配备水平对隔离使用的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(2):118-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.04.005. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review on Staff Attitudes towards the Use of Coercion in Mental Healthcare.关于精神卫生保健中工作人员对使用强制手段态度的范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 6;12(16):1552. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161552.
2
Number of Seclusions in the Netherlands Higher in the 7 Years Since the End of a Nationwide Seclusion-Reduction Program.自全国性减少隔离计划结束后的七年里,荷兰的隔离次数有所增加。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 3;12:778793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.778793. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluation of coercive measures in different psychiatric hospitals: the impact of institutional characteristics.
不同精神病院强制性措施的评估:机构特征的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03410-z.
4
Long-Term Impact of a Tailored Seclusion Reduction Program: Evidence for Change?个体化隔离减少计划的长期影响:有变化的证据吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):733-746. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9571-x.