Li Lan, Chen Dawei, Wang Chun, Yuan Nanbing, Wang Yan, He Liping, Yang Yanzhi, Chen Lihong, Liu Guanjian, Li Xiujun, Ran Xingwu
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Diabetic Foot Care Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Chinese Cochrane Centre, Chinese EBM Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):495-505. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12294. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
The purpose of the study is to examine the safety and effectiveness of topical autologous platelet-rich gel (APG) application on facilitating the healing of diabetic chronic refractory cutaneous ulcers. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. Eligible inpatients at the Diabetic Foot Care Center of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (China) were randomly prescribed with a 12-week standard treatment of ulcers (the control group) or standard treatment plus topical application APG (the APG group). The wound healing grades (primary endpoint), time to complete healing, and healing velocity within 12 weeks were monitored as short-term effectiveness measurements, while side effects were documented safety endpoints. The rates of survival and recurrence within the follow up were recorded as long-term effectiveness endpoints. Analysis on total diabetic ulcers (DUs) (n = 117) and subgroup analysis on diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) (n = 103) were both conducted. Standard treatment plus APG treatment was statistically more effective than standard treatment (p < 0.05 in both total DUs and subgroup of DFUs). The subjects defined as healing grade 1 were 50/59 (84.8%) in total DUs and 41/48 (85.4%) in DFUs in the APG group compared with 40/58 (69.0%) and 37/55 (67.3%) in the control group from intent to treat population. The Kaplan-Meier time-to-healing were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.05 in both total DUs and subgroup of DFUs). No side effects were identified after topical APG application. The long-term survival and recurrence rates were comparative between groups (p > 0.05). This study shows that topical APG application plus standard treatment is safe and quite effective on diabetic chronic refractory cutaneous ulcers, compared with standard treatment.
本研究的目的是检验局部应用自体富血小板凝胶(APG)促进糖尿病慢性难治性皮肤溃疡愈合的安全性和有效性。该研究设计为一项前瞻性随机对照试验,时间跨度为2007年1月1日至2011年12月31日。四川大学华西医院糖尿病足护理中心符合条件的住院患者被随机分配接受为期12周的溃疡标准治疗(对照组)或标准治疗加局部应用APG(APG组)。伤口愈合等级(主要终点)、完全愈合时间以及12周内的愈合速度作为短期有效性指标进行监测,而副作用作为安全性终点进行记录。随访期间的生存率和复发率作为长期有效性终点进行记录。对所有糖尿病溃疡(DU,n = 117)进行了分析,并对糖尿病足溃疡(DFU,n = 103)进行了亚组分析。标准治疗加APG治疗在统计学上比标准治疗更有效(在所有DU和DFU亚组中p均<0.05)。在意向性治疗人群中,APG组所有DU中愈合等级为1级的受试者为50/59(84.8%),DFU中为41/48(85.4%),而对照组所有DU中为40/58(69.0%),DFU中为37/55(67.3%)。两组之间的Kaplan-Meier愈合时间有显著差异(在所有DU和DFU亚组中p均<0.05)。局部应用APG后未发现副作用。两组之间的长期生存率和复发率相当(p>0.05)。本研究表明,与标准治疗相比,局部应用APG加标准治疗对糖尿病慢性难治性皮肤溃疡是安全且相当有效的。