Suppr超能文献

水果和蔬菜的消费与食物价值:美国按补充营养援助计划资格和烹饪频率划分的全国模式

Fruit and vegetable consumption and food values: National patterns in the United States by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program eligibility and cooking frequency.

作者信息

Wolfson Julia A, Bleich Sara N

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

More frequent cooking at home may help improve diet quality and be associated with food values, particularly for individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).

OBJECTIVE

To examine patterns of fruit and vegetable consumption and food values among adults (aged 20 and older) in the United States, by SNAP participation and household cooking frequency.

METHODS

Analysis of cross-sectional 24-hour dietary recall data obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2010 (N=9560).

RESULTS

A lower percentage of SNAP participants consumed fruit (total: 35% vs. 46%, p=0.001; fresh: 30% vs. 41%, p<0.001) and vegetables (total: 49% vs. 58%, p=0.004; fresh: 35% vs. 47%, p<0.001) than those ineligible for SNAP. Among SNAP participants, cooking >6times/week was associated with greater vegetable consumption compared to cooking <2times/week (175g vs. 98g, p=0.003). SNAP-eligible individuals who cooked ≥2times/week were more to report price (medium cookers: 47% vs. 33%, p=0.001; high cookers: 52% vs. 40%, p<0.001), ease of preparation (medium cookers: 36% vs. 28%, p=0.002; high cookers: 36% vs. 24%, p<0.001) and how long food keeps (medium cookers: 57% vs. 45%, p<0.001; high cookers: 61% vs. 50%, p<0.001) as important compared to SNAP-ineligible individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Fruit and vegetable consumption in the United States is low regardless of cooking frequency. Efforts to improve diet quality should consider values on which food purchases are based.

摘要

背景

更频繁地在家做饭可能有助于改善饮食质量,并与食物价值观相关,特别是对于参与补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的个人而言。

目的

按SNAP参与情况和家庭烹饪频率,研究美国成年人(20岁及以上)的水果和蔬菜消费模式及食物价值观。

方法

分析从2007 - 2010年国家健康和营养检查调查中获得的横断面24小时饮食回忆数据(N = 9560)。

结果

与无资格参与SNAP的人相比,参与SNAP的人食用水果(总计:35%对46%,p = 0.001;新鲜水果:30%对41%,p < 0.001)和蔬菜(总计:49%对58%,p = 0.004;新鲜蔬菜:35%对47%,p < 0.001)的比例更低。在参与SNAP的人中,每周做饭>6次与每周做饭<2次相比,蔬菜消费量更高(175克对98克,p = 0.003)。每周做饭≥2次的符合SNAP资格的个体比无资格参与SNAP的个体更倾向于将价格(中等频率做饭者:47%对33%,p = 0.001;高频率做饭者:52%对40%,p < 0.001)、准备的难易程度(中等频率做饭者:36%对28%,p = 0.002;高频率做饭者:36%对24%,p < 0.001)以及食物保存时长(中等频率做饭者:57%对45%,p < 0.001;高频率做饭者:61%对50%,p < 0.001)视为重要因素。

结论

无论烹饪频率如何,美国的水果和蔬菜消费量都较低。改善饮食质量的努力应考虑购买食物所依据的价值观。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Importance of cooking skills for balanced food choices.烹饪技巧对于均衡饮食选择的重要性。
Appetite. 2013 Jun;65:125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验