Suppr超能文献

桡动脉支架丢失——手术与介入治疗方法对比——两例报告

Stent loss in the radial artery - surgical vs. interventional approach - report of two cases.

作者信息

Baszko Artur, Telec Wojciech, Naumowicz Eryk, Siminiak Tomasz, Kałmucki Piotr

机构信息

2 Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Department of Surgery with Section of Vascular Surgery in HCP Medical Center, Poznan, Poland.

出版信息

Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2015;11(1):50-4. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2015.49186. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Abstract

Stent loss during coronary angioplasty is a complication that can be managed in various manners; however, transradial access limits the options available. We describe two coronary interventions complicated by stent dislodgement, initially managed by pulling the stent back to the radial artery. Both stents were unwillingly lost on different levels in radial arteries. The first case was managed with a direct radial artery cut-down because distal location made it a quick and straightforward procedure. In the second case a partially deployed stent was lost in the proximal part of the radial artery. It was rewired, deployed, and post-dilated with a larger balloon. This enabled continuation of the procedure using the same access. Both cases were asymptomatic during 24 months of follow-up. It is crucial to avoid leaving artificial bodies in arteries supplying vital organs because stent-related thrombosis or stenosis may seriously compromise blood flow. Removing the stent via the introducer sheath should be considered the optimal treatment. Unfortunately it is common that a partially expanded stent will not pass through the sheath. The superficial location of the distal radial artery segment facilitates surgical cut-down with local anaesthesia. When dislodgement occurs in deeper segments of the radial artery, the benefits from cut-down seem to be less because the procedure might take more time and be more difficult - as in the presented case in which we decided to rewire and fully expand the stent in situ. Retrieval of the stent at all costs might have led to further complications; hence stent deployment may be a good alternative to retrieval in such cases.

摘要

冠状动脉血管成形术期间的支架丢失是一种可通过多种方式处理的并发症;然而,经桡动脉途径限制了可用的选择。我们描述了两例因支架移位而复杂化的冠状动脉介入治疗,最初通过将支架拉回桡动脉进行处理。两个支架均意外地在桡动脉的不同水平丢失。第一例通过直接切开桡动脉进行处理,因为其远端位置使该操作快速且直接。在第二例中,一个部分展开的支架在桡动脉近端丢失。通过重新导丝、展开并使用更大的球囊进行后扩张。这使得能够使用相同的入路继续进行手术。两例在24个月的随访期间均无症状。避免在为重要器官供血的动脉中留置异物至关重要,因为支架相关的血栓形成或狭窄可能严重损害血流。通过导入鞘移除支架应被视为最佳治疗方法。不幸的是,部分扩张的支架通常无法通过鞘管。桡动脉远端段的表浅位置便于在局部麻醉下进行手术切开。当移位发生在桡动脉较深的节段时,切开的益处似乎较小,因为该操作可能需要更多时间且更困难——如本文所述的病例,我们决定重新导丝并在原位完全扩张支架。不惜一切代价取出支架可能会导致进一步的并发症;因此在这种情况下,支架置入可能是取出的一个好替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/137e/4372633/cd2d28765039/PWKI-11-24634-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验