Jones A S, Willatt D J, Durham L M
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Liverpool.
J Laryngol Otol. 1989 Oct;103(10):909-11. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100110485.
For many years nasal resistance to airflow measured by rhinomanometry has been regarded as the objective measure of nasal patency. However, recently it has become apparent that this may not be the case. The present study was designed to affirm or refute this view by using large numbers of subjects and observations. Five hundred estimations of (objective) nasal resistance to airflow and (subjective) nasal sensation of airflow where carried out. No correlation could be demonstrated between these two parameters. It is concluded nasal resistance to airflow and nasal sensation of airflow are two separate modalities which are not directly related. The possible reasons for this finding are discussed with reference to previous work on nasal sensation.
多年来,通过鼻阻力计测量的鼻腔气流阻力一直被视为鼻腔通畅程度的客观指标。然而,最近有明显迹象表明情况可能并非如此。本研究旨在通过大量受试者和观察来证实或反驳这一观点。对鼻腔气流阻力(客观)和气流感觉(主观)进行了500次测量。这两个参数之间未显示出相关性。得出的结论是,鼻腔气流阻力和气流感觉是两种不直接相关的独立形式。参照先前关于鼻腔感觉的研究讨论了这一发现的可能原因。