Simola M, Malmberg H
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1997 Jun;22(3):260-2. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1997.00033.x.
Over the past few decades there has been some controversy over the relationship between subjective assessment and objective measurement of nasal airway obstruction. To study the hypothesis that there is a close relationship between the two parameters, we analysed changes in nasal patency following histamine challenge. One hundred and two subjects with a history of allergic or non-allergic rhinitis assessed their nasal patency on a visual analogue scale during nasal histamine provocation. Active anterior rhinomanometry was performed immediately after each patient assessment. At all points, significant correlations were observed between subjective and objective assessments of nasal obstruction. Regression analysis also provided strong evidence of a close relationship between the two parameters. We conclude that rhinomanometry can be used as an objective tool in determining nasal patency.
在过去几十年里,关于鼻气道阻塞的主观评估与客观测量之间的关系一直存在一些争议。为了研究这两个参数之间存在密切关系的假设,我们分析了组胺激发后鼻通畅度的变化。102名有过敏性或非过敏性鼻炎病史的受试者在鼻组胺激发试验期间,通过视觉模拟量表评估其鼻通畅度。每次患者评估后立即进行主动前鼻测压。在所有时间点,鼻阻塞的主观评估与客观评估之间均观察到显著相关性。回归分析也有力地证明了这两个参数之间存在密切关系。我们得出结论,鼻测压可作为确定鼻通畅度的一种客观工具。