• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习如何学习:学会健康组织如何在变革的世界中支持证据生成。

Learning How to Learn: How AcademyHealth is Supporting Evidence Generation in a Transforming World.

作者信息

Simpson Lisa

机构信息

AcademyHealth.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Jan 17;1(1):1002. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1002. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1002
PMID:25848554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371400/
Abstract

The field of health services research faces significant challenges as it aims to address pressing issues of quality and cost in the US healthcare system. Major advances in the availability of electronic clinical data (ECD) provide the opportunity to address questions that are important to the recipients, providers, and purchasers of health care. This is where eGEMs has a role to play, meeting an expressed need in the scientific community by disseminating approaches and methods for using ECD. eGEMs can help researchers address these important questions and consider strategies to further improve the US healthcare system.

摘要

卫生服务研究领域面临着重大挑战,因为它旨在解决美国医疗保健系统中紧迫的质量和成本问题。电子临床数据(ECD)可用性的重大进展为解决对医疗保健接受者、提供者和购买者至关重要的问题提供了机会。这正是电子生成证据的方法学(eGEMs)发挥作用的地方,它通过传播使用ECD的方法来满足科学界明确表达的需求。eGEMs可以帮助研究人员解决这些重要问题,并考虑进一步改善美国医疗保健系统的策略。

相似文献

1
Learning How to Learn: How AcademyHealth is Supporting Evidence Generation in a Transforming World.学习如何学习:学会健康组织如何在变革的世界中支持证据生成。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Jan 17;1(1):1002. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1002. eCollection 2013.
2
eGEMs' Early Adventures in Open Access Publishing.eGEMs在开放获取出版领域的早期探索。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 9;2(1):1157. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1157. eCollection 2014.
3
A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.在紧迫的时间内完成艰巨的任务:利益相关者对使用电子临床数据进行的比较有效性研究的看法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Sep;1(5):441-51. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.47.
4
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
5
eGEMs: Pragmatic Publishing to Build a Learning Health System.电子健康与医学创新:务实出版以构建学习型健康系统。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2012 Dec 20;1(1):1001. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1001. eCollection 2013.
6
eGEMs: An Opportunity for Better Science.电子基因组学:实现更优科学的契机。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Jan 17;1(1):1006. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1006. eCollection 2013.
7
Moving Ahead: What's Next for the eGEMs Community.向前迈进:电子基因组学社区的下一步是什么。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 May 16;7(1):22. doi: 10.5334/egems.313.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Clinical cancer advances 2011: Annual Report on Progress Against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤进展 2011:美国临床肿瘤学会癌症进展年度报告。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 1;30(1):88-109. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1919. Epub 2011 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving Ahead: What's Next for the eGEMs Community.向前迈进:电子基因组学社区的下一步是什么。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 May 16;7(1):22. doi: 10.5334/egems.313.
2
Open Science and eGEMs: Our Role in Supporting a Culture of Collaboration in Learning Health Systems.开放科学与电子生成式证据医学:我们在支持学习型健康系统中的合作文化方面的作用。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Jun 27;4(1):1271. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1271. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Five reasons that many comparative effectiveness studies fail to change patient care and clinical practice.导致许多比较效果研究未能改变患者护理和临床实践的五个原因。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Oct;31(10):2168-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0150.
2
Strategies for de-identification and anonymization of electronic health record data for use in multicenter research studies.用于多中心研究的电子健康记录数据去识别和匿名化策略。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(Suppl):S82-101. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182585355.
3
Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.促进机构审查委员会批准多中心研究的方法。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S77-81. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825a76eb.
4
Research data collection methods: from paper to tablet computers.研究数据收集方法:从纸笔到平板电脑。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S68-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c1e7.
5
A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data.一种能够利用多机构异构临床数据进行分布式比较效果研究的信息学平台调查。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl(Suppl):S49-59. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c02b.
6
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.以患者为中心的结果研究协会(PCORI)的国家研究重点及初步研究议程。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1583-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.500.
7
Pathways to the use of health services research in policy.将卫生服务研究应用于政策的途径。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug;44(4):1111-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
8
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.我们如何提高研究成果向实际应用的转化?所需的证据类型。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145.
9
Evidence-based quality improvement: the state of the science.基于证据的质量改进:科学现状
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):138-50. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.138.
10
Lost in translation? Reflections on the role of research in improving health care for children.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Sep-Oct;23(5):125-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.5.125.