Dutton Richard P
Anesthesia Quality Institute.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Aug 27;2(2):1070. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1070. eCollection 2014.
Anesthesiologists care for patients of all ages, with all conceivable comorbidities, in every kind of health care facility. This leads to a significant challenge in the collection of data to describe the specialty, and in the development of evidence-based performance measures for anesthesiologists. Whereas narrowly defined medical specialties have developed registries based on manual abstraction of clinical data from the medical record (e.g., cardiac surgery), this approach would be prohibitively expensive for anesthesiology, and is unlikely to generate statistically useful data when major adverse outcomes occur a handful of times in tens of thousands of cases. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) addressed this challenge in 2008 by funding a related organization, the Anesthesia Quality Institute (AQI), to develop the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry (NACOR). The technical development of this registry and the approach taken to define the specialty of anesthesiology and the performance of anesthesiologists may serve as a model for other specialty society efforts.
麻醉医生在各类医疗保健机构中为各个年龄段、患有各种可想象到的合并症的患者提供护理。这给收集描述该专业的数据以及为麻醉医生制定基于证据的绩效指标带来了重大挑战。虽然狭义定义的医学专业已基于从病历中人工提取临床数据建立了登记系统(例如心脏外科手术),但这种方法对麻醉学来说成本过高,而且当主要不良结局在数万例病例中仅出现少数几次时,不太可能产生具有统计学意义的数据。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)在2008年通过资助一个相关组织——麻醉质量研究所(AQI)来应对这一挑战,以开发国家麻醉临床结局登记系统(NACOR)。该登记系统的技术开发以及用于定义麻醉学专业和麻醉医生绩效的方法,可能为其他专业协会的努力提供一个范例。