Suppr超能文献

硬膜外注射在腰椎间盘源性疼痛治疗中的作用:与融合术对比分析的系统评价

What is the Role of Epidural Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Discogenic Pain: A Systematic Review of Comparative Analysis with Fusion.

作者信息

Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Staats Peter S, Nampiaparampil Devi E, Hirsch Joshua A

机构信息

Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.

Premier Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2015 Apr;28(2):75-87. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.75. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar discogenic pain without pain mediated by a disc herniation, facet joints, or the sacroiliac joints, is common and often results in chronic, persistent pain and disability. After conservative treatment failure, injection therapy, such as an epidural injection, is frequently the next step considered in managing discogenic pain. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the efficacy of lumbar epidural injections in managing discogenic pain without radiculopathy, and compare this approach to lumbar fusion or disc arthroplasty surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized trials published from 1966 through October 2014 of all types of epidural injections and lumbar fusion or disc arthroplasty in managing lumbar discogenic pain was performed with methodological quality assessment and grading of evidence. The level of evidence was based on the grading of evidence criteria which, was conducted using 5 levels of evidence ranging from levels I to V.

RESULTS

Based on a qualitative assessment of the evidence for both approaches, there is Level II evidence for epidural injections, either caudal or lumbar interlaminar.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests fluoroscopically directed epidural injections provide long-term improvement in back and lower extremity pain for patients with lumbar discogenic pain. There is also limited evidence showing the potential effectiveness of surgical interventions compared to nonsurgical treatments.

摘要

背景

无椎间盘突出、小关节或骶髂关节介导疼痛的腰椎间盘源性疼痛很常见,常导致慢性持续性疼痛和功能障碍。保守治疗失败后,注射治疗,如硬膜外注射,通常是治疗椎间盘源性疼痛下一步考虑的方法。本系统评价的目的是确定腰椎硬膜外注射治疗无神经根病的椎间盘源性疼痛的疗效,并将这种方法与腰椎融合术或椎间盘置换手术进行比较。

方法

对1966年至2014年10月发表的关于各种硬膜外注射以及腰椎融合术或椎间盘置换术治疗腰椎间盘源性疼痛的随机试验进行系统评价,并进行方法学质量评估和证据分级。证据水平基于证据分级标准,该标准使用从I级到V级的5个证据水平进行。

结果

基于对两种方法证据的定性评估,尾侧或腰椎椎板间硬膜外注射有II级证据。

结论

现有证据表明,透视引导下的硬膜外注射可为腰椎间盘源性疼痛患者的背部和下肢疼痛提供长期改善。与非手术治疗相比,也有有限的证据显示手术干预的潜在有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d276/4387466/1e243c16287c/kjpain-28-75-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验