Suppr超能文献

最大摄氧量的自我选择工作速率方案在自动跑步机上测量。

VO2max Measured with a Self-selected Work Rate Protocol on an Automated Treadmill.

机构信息

1Department of Kinesiology and Health, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY; and 2Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Oct;47(10):2158-65. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000647.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of graded maximal exercise tests for measuring maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is common practice in both cardiopulmonary rehabilitation settings and in sports medicine research. Recent alterations of common testing protocols to allow for self-selected work rates (SPV) have elicited V˙O2max values similar to or higher than more traditional style protocols (TP). Research is lacking in the delivery of the SPV protocol using a treadmill modality. The purpose of the study was to examine the validity of an SPV using an automated treadmill for measuring cardiorespiratory fitness.

METHODS

Thirteen experienced endurance runners completed three maximal exercise tests on a treadmill. Oxygen consumption was measured using a computerized system and averaged more than 30-s time periods. SPV was completed using an automated treadmill that consisted of a sonar range finder, microcontroller, and customized computer software. Subject deviations from the middle of the treadmill belt resulted in rapid, graded increases or decreases in speed. TP was completed on the same treadmill without the use of the automated software. A verification phase protocol (VP) was used to verify if VO2 was maximal.

RESULTS

Peak work rate achieved during SPV was significantly greater than that achieved during TP by 1.2 METs; P < 0.05, d = 0.564. Oxygen consumption was significantly greater in TP (64.9 ± 8.2 mL·kg·min) than SPV (63.4 ± 7.8 mL·kg·min); P < 0.005, d = 0.195.

CONCLUSION

An automated treadmill allowed for the completion of SPV similar to what has been reported for cycling. SPV with an automated treadmill did not provide a higher VO2max than TP despite higher work rates.

摘要

目的

在心肺康复和运动医学研究中,使用分级最大运动测试来测量最大摄氧量(VO2max)是常见做法。最近对常见测试方案的修改允许自定工作率(SPV),得出的 VO2max 值与更传统的方案(TP)相似或更高。在跑步机模式下使用 SPV 协议的研究还很缺乏。本研究的目的是检验使用自动跑步机进行心肺适能测试的 SPV 的有效性。

方法

13 名经验丰富的耐力跑者在跑步机上完成了三次最大运动测试。使用计算机系统测量耗氧量,平均值超过 30 秒时间周期。SPV 是使用由声纳测距仪、微控制器和定制计算机软件组成的自动跑步机完成的。受试者从跑步机皮带的中间偏离会导致速度快速、分级增加或减少。TP 是在同一跑步机上完成的,不使用自动软件。验证阶段协议(VP)用于验证 VO2 是否达到最大值。

结果

SPV 期间达到的峰值工作率比 TP 高 1.2 METs,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05,d = 0.564);SPV 时的耗氧量(63.4 ± 7.8 mL·kg·min)显著低于 TP(64.9 ± 8.2 mL·kg·min)(P < 0.005,d = 0.195)。

结论

自动跑步机允许完成类似于报道的用于骑自行车的 SPV。尽管工作率较高,但自动跑步机的 SPV 并没有比 TP 提供更高的 VO2max。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验