• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于严重肺气肿的支气管内线圈在治疗后长达12个月内有效:一项随机对照试验的中期和交叉结果

Endobronchial coils for severe emphysema are effective up to 12 months following treatment: medium term and cross-over results from a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Zoumot Zaid, Kemp Samuel V, Singh Suveer, Bicknell Stephen R, McNulty William H, Hopkinson Nicholas S, Ross Ewen T, Shah Pallav L

机构信息

The NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Respiratory and Critical Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

The NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; Chelsea & Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0122656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122656. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122656
PMID:25853697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4390222/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a clinical need for therapeutic options to reduce hyperinflation associated with severe emphysema. Endobronchial Coils (coils) are nitinol devices implanted bronchoscopically under fluoroscopic guidance to re-tension the lung. We report the medium term effectiveness and safety of coils in a study of patients with emphysema.

METHODS

Forty five subjects with severe airflow obstruction and hyperinflation received bilateral sequential treatment with coils (30 day interval between treatments) as part of a randomised controlled trial with a primary endpoint 90 days after the final treatment (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01334307). Further assessments were made at 180 and 360 days and in this study the primary outcome was the effect of coil treatment on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) 360 days following treatment.

RESULTS

At 360 days following treatment, there was an improvement in the SGRQ score of -6.1±14.0 points (p = 0.01) compared to baseline. Improvements in secondary outcomes were seen with increases in forced expiratory volume in the first second of 8.9 ±22.2% (p = 0.002) and 6-minute walking distance of 34.1±52.4m (p = 0.003). The safety profile was acceptable out to 360 days post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically and clinically meaningful benefits in quality of life, exercise capacity and pulmonary function in patients treated with coils are sustained twelve months after treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01334307.

摘要

背景

临床上需要有治疗方案来减轻与重度肺气肿相关的肺过度充气。支气管内线圈是一种镍钛诺装置,在荧光镜引导下通过支气管镜植入,以使肺重新张紧。我们在一项针对肺气肿患者的研究中报告了线圈的中期有效性和安全性。

方法

45名患有严重气流阻塞和肺过度充气的受试者接受了双侧序贯线圈治疗(治疗间隔30天),这是一项随机对照试验的一部分,主要终点为最后一次治疗后90天(Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01334307)。在180天和360天时进行了进一步评估,在本研究中,主要结局是线圈治疗对治疗后360天圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)的影响。

结果

治疗后360天,与基线相比,SGRQ评分改善了-6.1±14.0分(p = 0.01)。次要结局也有改善,第一秒用力呼气量增加了8.9±22.2%(p = 0.002),6分钟步行距离增加了34.1±52.4米(p = 0.003)。治疗后360天的安全性良好。

结论

接受线圈治疗的患者在生活质量、运动能力和肺功能方面在统计学和临床上都有显著益处,且在治疗后12个月仍持续存在。

试验注册信息

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01334307。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf4/4390222/5b976b1255af/pone.0122656.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf4/4390222/af8a732bddfa/pone.0122656.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf4/4390222/5b976b1255af/pone.0122656.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf4/4390222/af8a732bddfa/pone.0122656.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf4/4390222/5b976b1255af/pone.0122656.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Endobronchial coils for severe emphysema are effective up to 12 months following treatment: medium term and cross-over results from a randomised controlled trial.用于严重肺气肿的支气管内线圈在治疗后长达12个月内有效:一项随机对照试验的中期和交叉结果
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0122656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122656. eCollection 2015.
2
Effect of Endobronchial Coils vs Usual Care on Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The RENEW Randomized Clinical Trial.经支气管镜线圈置入与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者运动耐量的影响:RENEW 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2178-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6261.
3
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (TRANSFORM).Zephyr 支气管内活瓣治疗不均质肺气肿的多中心随机对照试验(TRANSFORM)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 15;196(12):1535-1543. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201707-1327OC.
4
Long-term follow-up after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment with coils in patients with severe emphysema.重度肺气肿患者经支气管镜下用线圈进行肺减容治疗后的长期随访。
Respirology. 2015 Feb;20(2):319-26. doi: 10.1111/resp.12435. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
5
Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial.支气管腔内线圈治疗肺气肿伴过度充气(RESET):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 May;1(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70047-X. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
6
The Safety and Feasibility of Re-treating Patients with Severe Emphysema with Endobronchial Coils: A Pilot Study.支气管内线圈再治疗重度肺气肿患者的安全性和可行性:一项试点研究。
COPD. 2017 Jun;14(3):339-343. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1318842. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Zephyr Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Heterogeneous Emphysema (LIBERATE).Zephyr 支气管内阀治疗异质性肺气肿的多中心随机对照试验(LIBERATE)。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Nov 1;198(9):1151-1164. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0590OC.
8
Lung volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema: a European multicentre trial.重度肺气肿患者的肺减容线圈治疗:一项欧洲多中心试验。
Thorax. 2014 Nov;69(11):980-6. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205221. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
9
Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment vs Usual Care in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The REVOLENS Randomized Clinical Trial.肺减容线圈治疗与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者的影响:REVOLENS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):175-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17821.
10
Endobronchial coil treatment in severe emphysema patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.α-1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏的重度肺气肿患者的支气管内线圈治疗
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Nov 5;13:3645-3649. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S176366. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung Tensioning Device Coil Treatment in Patients with Severe Emphysema: A Prospective Safety and Feasibility Trial (EFFORT).重度肺气肿患者的肺张力装置线圈治疗:一项前瞻性安全性和可行性试验(EFFORT)
Respiration. 2025;104(1):58-68. doi: 10.1159/000541366. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema.肺肺气肿的手术和支气管镜肺功能改善术。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Dec 20;32(170). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0004-2023. Print 2023 Dec 31.
3
Which Endoscopic Procedure to Use and in What Patient? Valves, Coils, Foam, and Heat in COPD and Asthma.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical approaches for lung volume reduction in emphysema.肺气肿肺减容术的手术入路。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Apr;14(2):122-7. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-2-122.
2
Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial.支气管腔内线圈治疗肺气肿伴过度充气(RESET):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 May;1(3):233-40. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70047-X. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
3
Trends in the prevalence of obstructive and restrictive lung function among adults in the United States: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination surveys from 1988-1994 to 2007-2010.
使用哪种内镜手术以及针对哪些患者?慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘中的瓣膜、线圈、泡沫和热疗。
Pulm Ther. 2023 Mar;9(1):49-69. doi: 10.1007/s41030-022-00208-6. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment for Severe Emphysema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data.支气管镜肺减容线圈治疗严重肺气肿:个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respiration. 2022;101(7):697-705. doi: 10.1159/000524148. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Effect of Endobronchial Coils on Exercise Tolerance and Lung Functions in Patients with Severe Emphysema - A Retrospective Cohort Study of 48 Patients.经支气管线圈置入术对重度肺气肿患者运动耐量和肺功能的影响:48 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Oct 8;16:2809-2815. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S327048. eCollection 2021.
6
Airway granulation response to lung-implantable medical devices: a concise overview.气道植入医疗器械的肉芽反应:简要概述。
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Aug 3;30(161). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0066-2021. Print 2021 Sep 30.
7
Identifying Responders and Exploring Mechanisms of Action of the Endobronchial Coil Treatment for Emphysema.确定内支气管线圈治疗肺气肿的应答者并探索其作用机制。
Respiration. 2021;100(5):443-451. doi: 10.1159/000514319. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
8
Bronchoscopic interventions for emphysema: Current status.用于肺气肿的支气管镜介入治疗:现状
Lung India. 2020 Nov-Dec;37(6):518-529. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_8_20.
9
The Efficacy of Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment in Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Type II Respiratory Failure.肺减容线圈治疗 II 型呼吸衰竭的严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的疗效。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Mar 3;15:479-486. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S218785. eCollection 2020.
10
Prediction of response to endobronchial coiling based on morphologic emphysema characterization of the lung lobe to be treated and the ipsilateral non-treated lobe as well as on functional computed tomography-data: correlation with clinical and pulmonary function.基于待治疗肺叶及同侧未治疗肺叶的形态学肺气肿特征以及功能计算机断层扫描数据预测支气管内线圈治疗反应:与临床及肺功能的相关性
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jan;11(1):93-102. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.64.
美国成年人中阻塞性和限制性肺功能的流行趋势:1988-1994 年至 2007-2010 年全国健康和营养检查调查的结果。
Chest. 2013 May;143(5):1395-1406. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1135.
4
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
5
Bilateral endoscopic sealant lung volume reduction therapy for advanced emphysema.双侧内镜下密封剂肺减容术治疗晚期肺气肿。
Chest. 2012 Nov;142(5):1111-1117. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-0421.
6
Efficacy of bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation and lobar fissure completeness in patients with heterogeneous emphysema.支气管热蒸汽消融术及叶间裂完整性对非均质性肺气肿患者的疗效。
Respiration. 2012;83(5):400-6. doi: 10.1159/000336239. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
7
Effect of fissure integrity on lung volume reduction using a polymer sealant in advanced emphysema.聚合物密封剂对晚期肺气肿肺减容术肺裂完整性的影响。
Thorax. 2012 Apr;67(4):302-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201038. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
8
Efficacy predictors of lung volume reduction with Zephyr valves in a European cohort.使用 Zephyr 阀进行肺减容术的欧洲队列的疗效预测因子。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jun;39(6):1334-42. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00161611. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction coil treatment of patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema.支气管镜肺减容线圈治疗严重非均质性肺气肿患者。
Chest. 2012 Sep;142(3):574-582. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0730.
10
Bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation therapy in the management of heterogeneous emphysema.支气管镜下热蒸汽消融治疗肺气肿的异质性。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jun;39(6):1326-33. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00092411. Epub 2011 Nov 10.