• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is dose escalation achievable for esophageal carcinoma?食管癌的剂量递增是否可行?
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 Jan 5;20(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.12.006. eCollection 2015 Mar-Apr.
2
Dosimetric comparison of TomoDirect, helical tomotherapy, VMAT, and ff-IMRT for upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.TomoDirect、螺旋断层放疗、容积调强弧形放疗和固定野调强适形放疗在上段食管癌治疗中的剂量学比较
Med Dosim. 2019;44(2):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 Jun 24.
3
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.螺旋断层放疗、RapidArc 与新型调强放疗和弧形技术治疗食管癌的剂量学比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Dec;101(3):431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
4
Volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with TomoTherapy and step-and-shoot IMRT.容积旋转调强弧形治疗鼻咽癌:与托姆刀和静态调强适形放射治疗的剂量学比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.11.017. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography/CT-guided volumetric-modulated arc therapy-based dose escalation for hypoxic subvolume in nasopharyngeal carcinomas: A feasibility study.基于F-氟米索硝唑正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描引导的容积调强弧形放疗对鼻咽癌缺氧亚体积进行剂量递增的可行性研究。
Head Neck. 2017 Dec;39(12):2519-2527. doi: 10.1002/hed.24925. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
6
Report on planning comparison of VMAT, IMRT and helical tomotherapy for the ESCALOX-trial pre-study.ESCALOX 试验预研究的 VMAT、IMRT 和螺旋断层调强放疗计划比较报告。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Nov 2;15(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01693-2.
7
Extended-field bone marrow sparing radiotherapy for primary chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with para-aortic lymphadenopathy: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus helical tomotherapy.宫颈癌合并腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移患者同期放化疗中扩展野骨髓保护放疗的比较:容积旋转调强弧形治疗与螺旋断层放疗。
J Xray Sci Technol. 2020;28(1):111-124. doi: 10.3233/XST-190593.
8
Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.哪种放疗技术对局部晚期宫颈癌患者最有益?调强质子治疗与调强光子治疗、螺旋断层放疗和容积弧形调强放疗用于初次放疗的个体内比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Apr 17;10:91. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0402-z.
9
Dosimetric Comparison of Sequential Simultaneous-integrated Boost in Early-stage Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Breast-conserving Surgery.保乳术后早期乳腺癌患者序贯同步加量放疗的剂量学比较。
In Vivo. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):2181-2189. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11720.
10
Dosimetric comparison between helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc-therapy for non-anaplastic thyroid cancer treatment.螺旋断层放射治疗与容积调强弧形放疗在非间变性甲状腺癌治疗中的剂量学比较。
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Nov 26;9:247. doi: 10.1186/s13014-014-0247-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between morphological parameters and dosimetric parameters of the heart and spinal cord in the intermediate- and advanced-stage esophageal cancer.中晚期食管癌心脏和脊髓形态学参数与剂量学参数的相关性。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Mar;7(3):e2015. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.2015.
2
Cardiotoxicity of radiation therapy in esophageal cancer.食管癌放射治疗的心脏毒性
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 May-Jun;25(3):318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Intrafraction esophageal motion in patients with clinical T1N0 esophageal cancer.临床T1N0期食管癌患者的分次内食管运动
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):398-401. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
Definitive chemoradiotherapy.根治性放化疗
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S792-S798. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.05.

本文引用的文献

1
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with RapidArc(®): An evaluation of treatment delivery efficiency.容积调强弧形治疗技术(RapidArc(®)):治疗实施效率评估
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2013 Aug 17;18(6):383-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2013.07.005.
2
Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy for unresectable oesophageal cancer: A mono-institutional study on 40 patients.不可切除食管癌的同步放化疗:一项针对40例患者的单机构研究。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012 May 22;17(4):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.03.013. eCollection 2012.
3
A study on conventional IMRT and RapidArc treatment planning techniques for head and neck cancers.一项关于头颈癌的传统调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(RapidArc)治疗计划技术的研究。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2012 Mar 3;17(3):168-75. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.01.009. eCollection 2012.
4
Radiotherapy for esophageal cancer using simultaneous integrated boost techniques: dosimetric comparison of helical TomoTherapy, Volumetric-modulated Arc Therapy (RapidArc) and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy.螺旋断层放疗、容积调强弧形放疗(RapidArc)和动态调强放疗在食管癌放疗中的同步整合增敏技术:剂量学比较。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Dec;12(6):485-91. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500348. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
5
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.容积旋转调强弧形治疗技术在胸段食管癌大靶区中的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 6;14(3):4269. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i3.4269.
6
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.容积旋转调强弧形治疗与常规调强适形放疗在食管癌中的比较:一项治疗计划的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct 7;18(37):5266-75. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i37.5266.
7
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.螺旋断层放疗、RapidArc 与新型调强放疗和弧形技术治疗食管癌的剂量学比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Dec;101(3):431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.030. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
8
Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for distal oesophageal malignancies.容积调强弧形治疗计划用于治疗远端食管恶性肿瘤。
Br J Radiol. 2012 Jan;85(1009):44-52. doi: 10.1259/bjr/25428720. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
9
Volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. IMRT for the treatment of distal esophageal cancer.容积调强弧形放疗与调强适形放疗治疗远端食管癌的比较。
Med Dosim. 2011 Winter;36(4):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.09.009. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
10
Esophageal cancer dose escalation using a simultaneous integrated boost technique.食管癌采用同步整合升压技术进行剂量递增。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.023. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

食管癌的剂量递增是否可行?

Is dose escalation achievable for esophageal carcinoma?

作者信息

Vieillevigne Laure, Vidal Marie, Izar Françoise, Rives Michel

机构信息

Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Radiotherapy Department, France.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 Jan 5;20(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.12.006. eCollection 2015 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.rpor.2014.12.006
PMID:25859404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4338214/
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the feasibility of dose escalation using rapid arc (RA) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT) for patients with upper, middle and distal esophageal carcinomas, even for large tumor volumes.

BACKGROUND

In esophageal cancer, for patients with exclusive radio-chemotherapy, local disease control remains poor. Planning study with dose escalation was done for two sophisticated modulated radiotherapy techniques: Rapid arc against Tomotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six patients treated with a RA simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 60 Gy were re-planned for RA and HT techniques with a SIB dose escalated to 70 Gy. Dose volume histogram statistics, conformity indices and homogeneity indices were analyzed. For a given set of normal tissue constraints, the capability of each treatment modality to increase the GTV dose to 70 Gy was investigated.

RESULTS

Either HT or VMAT may be used to escalate the dose delivered in esophageal tumors while maintaining the spinal cord, lung and heart doses within tolerance. Adequate target coverage was achieved by both techniques. Typically, HT achieved better lung sparing and PTV coverage than did RA.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation for esophageal cancer becomes clinically feasible with the use of RA and HT. This promising result could be explored in a carefully controlled clinical study which considered normal tissue complications and tumor control as endpoints.

摘要

目的

探讨采用容积旋转调强放疗(RA)和螺旋断层放疗(HT)对食管上段、中段和下段癌患者,甚至是肿瘤体积较大的患者进行剂量递增的可行性。

背景

在食管癌中,对于单纯接受放化疗的患者,局部疾病控制效果仍然较差。针对两种先进的调强放疗技术(容积旋转调强放疗与螺旋断层放疗)进行了剂量递增的计划研究。

材料与方法

对6例接受60 Gy容积旋转调强放疗同步整合加量(SIB)治疗的患者,重新制定容积旋转调强放疗和螺旋断层放疗计划,将同步整合加量剂量增至70 Gy。分析剂量体积直方图统计数据、适形指数和均匀性指数。在给定的一组正常组织限制条件下,研究每种治疗方式将大体肿瘤体积(GTV)剂量增至70 Gy的能力。

结果

螺旋断层放疗或容积旋转调强放疗均可用于提高食管肿瘤的放疗剂量,同时将脊髓、肺和心脏的剂量维持在耐受范围内。两种技术均实现了足够的靶区覆盖。通常,螺旋断层放疗在保护肺组织和计划靶区(PTV)覆盖方面比容积旋转调强放疗效果更好。

结论

使用容积旋转调强放疗和螺旋断层放疗使食管癌的剂量递增在临床上变得可行。这一有前景的结果可在一项精心控制的临床研究中进行探索,该研究将正常组织并发症和肿瘤控制作为终点指标。