Johnson Liam, Rodrigues Julian, Teo Wei-Peng, Walters Susan, Stell Rick, Thickbroom Gary, Mastaglia Frank
Western Australian Neuroscience Research Institute, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Western Australian Neuroscience Research Institute, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Gait Posture. 2015 May;41(4):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.03.346. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
Postural instability is a major source of disability in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD). Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPI-DBS) improves clinician-rated balance control but there have been few quantitative studies of its interactive effects with levodopa (L-DOPA). The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term and interactive effects of GPI-DBS and L-DOPA on objective measures of postural stability in patients with longstanding IPD.
Static and dynamic posturography during a whole-body leaning task were performed in 10 IPD patients with bilateral GPI stimulators under the following conditions: untreated (OFF); L-DOPA alone; DBS alone; DBS+L-DOPA, and in 9 healthy Control subjects. Clinical status was assessed using the UPDRS and AIMS Dyskinesia Scale.
Static sway was greater in IPD patients in the OFF state compared to the Control subjects and was further increased by L-DOPA and reduced by GPI-DBS. In the dynamic task, L-DOPA had a greater effect than GPI-DBS on improving Start Time, but reduced the spatial accuracy and directional control of the task. When the two therapies were combined, GPI-DBS prevented the L-DOPA induced increase in static sway and improved the accuracy of the dynamic task.
The findings demonstrate GPI-DBS and L-DOPA have differential effects on temporal and spatial aspects of postural control in IPD and that GPI-DBS counteracts some of the adverse effects of L-DOPA. Further studies on larger numbers of patients with GPI stimulators are required to confirm these findings and to clarify the contribution of dyskinesias to impaired dynamic postural control.
姿势不稳是特发性帕金森病(IPD)致残的主要原因。内侧苍白球深部脑刺激(GPI-DBS)可改善临床医生评定的平衡控制,但关于其与左旋多巴(L-DOPA)相互作用的定量研究较少。本研究的目的是比较GPI-DBS和L-DOPA对长期IPD患者姿势稳定性客观指标的短期和交互作用。
对10例双侧植入GPI刺激器的IPD患者在以下条件下进行全身倾斜任务时的静态和动态姿势描记:未治疗(关期);单独使用L-DOPA;单独使用DBS;DBS+L-DOPA,并与9名健康对照者进行比较。使用统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)和异常不自主运动量表(AIMS)评估临床状态。
与对照者相比,IPD患者在关期的静态摆动更大,L-DOPA使其进一步增加,GPI-DBS使其减少。在动态任务中,L-DOPA在改善起始时间方面比GPI-DBS有更大的作用,但降低了任务的空间准确性和方向控制。当两种治疗方法联合使用时,GPI-DBS可防止L-DOPA引起的静态摆动增加,并提高动态任务的准确性。
研究结果表明,GPI-DBS和L-DOPA对IPD患者姿势控制的时间和空间方面有不同的影响,并且GPI-DBS可抵消L-DOPA的一些不良反应。需要对更多植入GPI刺激器的患者进行进一步研究,以证实这些发现并阐明运动障碍对动态姿势控制受损的影响。