Suppr超能文献

博茨瓦纳的安全男性包皮环切术:传统习俗与生物医学推广之间的矛盾

Safe male circumcision in Botswana: tension between traditional practices and biomedical marketing.

作者信息

Katisi Masego, Daniel Marguerite

机构信息

a Department of Health Promotion and Development , University of Bergen , Bergen , Norway.

出版信息

Glob Public Health. 2015;10(5-6):739-56. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1028424. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

Abstract

Botswana has been running Safe Male Circumcision (SMC) since 2009 and has not yet met its target. Donors like the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Africa Comprehensive HIV/AIDS Partnership (funded by the Gates Foundation) in collaboration with Botswana's Ministry of Health have invested much to encourage HIV-negative men to circumcise. Demand creation strategies make use of media and celebrities. The objective of this paper is to explore responses to SMC in relation to circumcision as part of traditional initiation practices. More specifically, we present the views of two communities in Botswana on SMC consultation processes, implementation procedures and campaign strategies. The methods used include participant observation, in-depth interviews with key stakeholders (donors, implementers and Ministry officials), community leaders and men in the community. We observe that consultation with traditional leaders was done in a seemingly superficial, non-participatory manner. While SMC implementers reported pressure to deliver numbers to the World Health Organization, traditional leaders promoted circumcision through their routine traditional initiation ceremonies at breaks of two-year intervals. There were conflicting views on public SMC demand creation campaigns in relation to the traditional secrecy of circumcision. In conclusion, initial cooperation of local chiefs and elders turned into resistance.

摘要

博茨瓦纳自2009年起开展男性安全包皮环切术(SMC),但尚未实现其目标。美国疾病控制与预防中心以及由盖茨基金会资助的非洲综合防治艾滋病伙伴关系等捐赠方与博茨瓦纳卫生部合作,投入了大量资金鼓励HIV阴性男性接受包皮环切术。需求创造策略利用了媒体和名人。本文的目的是探讨与作为传统成年礼一部分的包皮环切术相关的对男性安全包皮环切术的反应。更具体地说,我们呈现了博茨瓦纳两个社区对男性安全包皮环切术咨询流程、实施程序和宣传策略的看法。所采用的方法包括参与观察、对关键利益相关者(捐赠方、实施者和卫生部官员)、社区领袖以及社区男性进行深入访谈。我们观察到,与传统领袖的协商是以一种看似表面、非参与性的方式进行的。虽然男性安全包皮环切术的实施者报告称面临向世界卫生组织提交数据的压力,但传统领袖通过每两年一次的常规传统成年礼仪式来推广包皮环切术。在与包皮环切术传统保密性相关的公共男性安全包皮环切术需求创造活动方面存在相互冲突的观点。总之,当地酋长和长老最初的合作变成了抵制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27c9/4487566/9cda61be7003/rgph-10-739-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验