Adelufosi Adegoke Oloruntoba, Abayomi Olukayode, Ojo Tunde Massey-Ferguson
Community Mental Health Program, Northern Regional Health Authority, 867 Thompson Drive, South Thompson, Manitoba, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 13;2015(4):CD010501. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010501.pub2.
Tardive dyskinesia is a chronic and disabling abnormal movement disorder affecting the muscles of the face, neck, tongue and the limbs. It is a common side effect of long-term antipsychotic medication use in individuals with schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. While there are no known effective treatments for tardive dyskinesia to date, some reports suggest that pyridoxal 5 phosphate may be effective in reducing the severity of tardive dyskinesia symptoms.
To determine the effectiveness of pyridoxal 5 phosphate (vitamin B6 or Pyridoxine or Pyridoxal phosphate) in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia among people with schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders.
The Cochrane schizophrenia group's register of clinical trials was searched (January 2013) using the phrase: [Pyridoxal OR Pyridoxine OR P5P OR PLP OR tardoxal OR Vitamin B6 O Vitamin B 6 R in title, abstract or index terms of REFERENCE, or interventions of STUDY. References of relevant identified studies were handsearched and where necessary, the first authors of relevant studies were contacted.
Studies described as randomised controlled trials comparing the effectiveness pyridoxal 5 phosphate with placebo in the treatment of neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia among patients with schizophrenia.
The review authors independently extracted data from each selected study. For dichotomous data, we calculated risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on an intention-to-treat basis based on a fixed-effect model. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs, again based on a fixed-effect model. We assessed risk of bias for each included study and used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to rate quality of evidence.
Of the 12 records retrieved by the search, three trials published in 2001, 2003 and 2007, involving 80 inpatients with schizophrenia, aged 18 to 71 years, admitted in a psychiatric facility and followed up for a period nine weeks to 26 weeks, were included. Overall, pyridoxal 5 phosphate produced a significant improvement in tardive dyskinesia symptoms when compared with placebo, assessed by a change in Extrapyramidal Symptoms Rating Scale (ESRS) scores from baseline to the end of the first phase of the included studies (2 RCTs n = 65, RR 19.97, CI 2.87 to 139.19, low quality evidence). The endpoint tardive dyskinesia score (a measure of its severity) assessed with the ESRS, was significantly lower among participants on pyridoxal 5 phosphate compared to those on placebo (2 RCTs n = 60, MD -4.07, CI -6.36 to -1.79, low quality evidence).It was unclear whether pyridoxal 5 phosphate led to more side effects (n = 65, 2 RCTs, RR 3.97, CI 0.20 to 78.59, low quality evidence) or caused deterioration in tardive dyskinesia symptoms when compared to placebo (n = 65, 2 RCTs, RR 0.16, CI 0.01 to 3.14, low quality evidence). Five participants taking pyridoxal 5 phosphate withdrew from the study because they were not willing to take more medications while none of the participants taking placebo discontinued their medications (n = 65, 2 RCTs, RR 8.72, CI 0.51 to 149.75, low quality evidence).There was no significant difference in the endpoint positive and negative psychiatric symptoms scores, measured using the Positive and Negative symptoms Scale (PANSS) between participants taking pyridoxal 5 phosphate and those taking placebo. For the positive symptoms: (n = 15, 1 RCT, MD -1.50, CI -4.80 to 1.80, low quality evidence). For negative the symptoms: (n = 15, 1 RCT, MD -1.10, CI -5.92 to 3.72, low quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Pyridoxal 5 phosphate may have some benefits in reducing the severity of tardive dyskinesia symptoms among individuals with schizophrenia. However, the quality of evidence supporting the effectiveness of pyridoxal 5 phosphate in treating tardive dyskinesia is low, based on few studies, short follow-up periods, small sample sizes and inadequate adherence to standardised reporting guidelines for randomised controlled trials among the included studies.
迟发性运动障碍是一种慢性致残性异常运动障碍,影响面部、颈部、舌头和四肢的肌肉。它是精神分裂症和其他相关精神障碍患者长期使用抗精神病药物的常见副作用。虽然迄今为止尚无已知的有效治疗迟发性运动障碍的方法,但一些报告表明,磷酸吡哆醛可能有效减轻迟发性运动障碍症状的严重程度。
确定磷酸吡哆醛(维生素B6或吡哆醇或磷酸吡哆醛)在治疗精神分裂症和其他相关精神障碍患者中抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍的有效性。
使用以下检索词检索Cochrane精神分裂症研究组的临床试验注册库(2013年1月):[“磷酸吡哆醛”或“吡哆醇”或“P5P”或“PLP”或“tardoxal”或“维生素B6”或“维生素B6”],检索词出现在参考文献的标题、摘要或索引词中,或出现在研究的干预措施中。对相关纳入研究的参考文献进行手工检索,必要时联系相关研究的第一作者。
描述为随机对照试验的研究,比较磷酸吡哆醛与安慰剂在治疗精神分裂症患者抗精神病药物所致迟发性运动障碍中的有效性。
综述作者独立从每项入选研究中提取数据。对于二分法数据,我们基于固定效应模型,在意向性分析的基础上计算风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。对于连续性数据,我们同样基于固定效应模型计算平均差(MD)及其95%CI。我们评估了每项纳入研究的偏倚风险,并使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定与评价)方法对证据质量进行评级。
检索到的12条记录中,纳入了2001年、2003年和2007年发表的3项试验,涉及80例年龄在18至71岁之间、入住精神科机构且随访9周至26周的精神分裂症住院患者。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,磷酸吡哆醛使迟发性运动障碍症状有显著改善,这通过纳入研究第一阶段从基线到结束时锥体外系症状评定量表(ESRS)评分的变化来评估(2项随机对照试验,n = 65,RR 19.97,CI 2.87至139.19,低质量证据)。与安慰剂组相比,接受磷酸吡哆醛治疗的参与者用ESRS评估的终点迟发性运动障碍评分(其严重程度的一项指标)显著更低(2项随机对照试验,n = 60,MD -4.07,CI -6.36至-1.79,低质量证据)。与安慰剂相比,尚不清楚磷酸吡哆醛是否导致更多副作用(n = 65,2项随机对照试验,RR 3.97,CI 0.20至78.59,低质量证据)或使迟发性运动障碍症状恶化(n = 65,2项随机对照试验,RR 0.16,CI 0.01至3.14,低质量证据)。5名服用磷酸吡哆醛的参与者退出了研究,因为他们不愿意服用更多药物,而服用安慰剂的参与者中无人停药(n = 65,2项随机对照试验,RR 8.72,CI 0.51至149.75,低质量证据)。使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)测量的终点阳性和阴性精神症状评分,在服用磷酸吡哆醛的参与者和服用安慰剂的参与者之间无显著差异。对于阳性症状:(n = 15,1项随机对照试验,MD -1.50,CI -4.80至1.80,低质量证据)。对于阴性症状:(n = 15,1项随机对照试验,MD -1.10,CI -5.92至3.72,低质量证据)。
磷酸吡哆醛可能在减轻精神分裂症患者迟发性运动障碍症状的严重程度方面有一些益处。然而,基于研究数量少、随访期短、样本量小以及纳入研究中对随机对照试验标准化报告指南的依从性不足,支持磷酸吡哆醛治疗迟发性运动障碍有效性的证据质量较低。