• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

司法部门对高功能自闭症罪犯的犯罪行为和意图的看法。

Judiciary views on criminal behaviour and intention of offenders with high-functioning autism.

作者信息

Berryessa Colleen M

机构信息

Program Manager, based at Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Offending Behav. 2014;5(2):97-106. doi: 10.1108/JIDOB-02-2014-0002.

DOI:10.1108/JIDOB-02-2014-0002
PMID:25866642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4392381/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to explore how judges perceive High Functioning Autistic Spectrum Disorders (hfASDs) and the disorders' effects on an offender's ability to formulate criminal intent and control behaviour.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Semi-structured interviews on topics related to offenders with hfASDs were conducted with 21 California Superior Court Judges. A coding scheme was developed and an iterative qualitative coding process was used for analysis.

FINDINGS

Analysis yielded three major themes on how an hfASD diagnosis affects an offender's ability to regulate actions and criminal behaviour. Interviewed judges reported beliefs that hfASD offenders view the world in a different way and that much of their behaviour is not under their direct control. Judges reported these perceptions likely affect how they criminally process and make legal decisions regarding offenders with hfASDs.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The sample size was small and therefore no statistical significance can be drawn from results; findings cannot be applied to perceptions or experiences of the entire California Superior Court Judge population.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Past academic research reports that individuals with hfASDs that offend often do so because of specific symptoms associated with the disorder. This presents a complex dilemma for the criminal justice system regarding how best to understand the disorder and process these offenders. This study and its findings aim to shed light on issues judges encounter in determining these offenders' responsibility and sentencing, in what ways this information might be integrated into judicial decision making, and areas where future research is needed.

摘要

目的

本文旨在探讨法官如何看待高功能自闭症谱系障碍(hfASDs)以及该障碍对罪犯形成犯罪意图和控制行为能力的影响。

设计/方法/途径:对21名加利福尼亚高等法院法官进行了关于与患有hfASDs的罪犯相关主题的半结构化访谈。制定了编码方案,并采用迭代定性编码过程进行分析。

研究结果

分析得出了关于hfASD诊断如何影响罪犯调节行动和犯罪行为能力的三个主要主题。接受采访的法官表示,他们认为患有hfASD的罪犯以不同的方式看待世界,并且他们的许多行为不受其直接控制。法官们表示,这些看法可能会影响他们对患有hfASDs的罪犯进行刑事处理和做出法律决定的方式。

研究局限性/影响:样本量较小,因此无法从结果中得出统计学意义;研究结果不能应用于整个加利福尼亚高等法院法官群体的看法或经历。

原创性/价值:过去的学术研究报告称,患有hfASDs的罪犯犯罪往往是由于与该障碍相关的特定症状。这给刑事司法系统带来了一个复杂的困境,即如何最好地理解这种障碍并处理这些罪犯。本研究及其结果旨在阐明法官在确定这些罪犯的责任和量刑时遇到的问题、这些信息可能以何种方式纳入司法决策以及未来需要研究的领域。

相似文献

1
Judiciary views on criminal behaviour and intention of offenders with high-functioning autism.司法部门对高功能自闭症罪犯的犯罪行为和意图的看法。
J Intellect Disabil Offending Behav. 2014;5(2):97-106. doi: 10.1108/JIDOB-02-2014-0002.
2
Judicial Perceptions of Media Portrayals of Offenders with High Functioning Autistic Spectrum Disorders.司法部门对高功能自闭症谱系障碍罪犯的媒体形象塑造的认知。
Int J Criminol Sociol. 2014;3:46-60. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.04.
3
Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism.简短报告:关于对高功能自闭症罪犯量刑的司法态度
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Aug;46(8):2770-2773. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2798-1.
4
Impact of Psychiatric Information on Potential Jurors in Evaluating High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder (hfASD).精神科信息对潜在陪审员评估高功能自闭症谱系障碍(hfASD)的影响。
J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2015 Jul 1;8(3-4):140-167. doi: 10.1080/19315864.2015.1040176. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
Jurors' and Judges' Evaluation of Defendants with Autism and the Impact on Sentencing: A Systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Review of Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Courtroom.陪审员和法官对患有自闭症的被告的评估及其对量刑的影响:一项针对法庭中自闭症谱系障碍的系统评价和荟萃分析的系统优先报告项目(PRISMA)综述。
J Law Med. 2017 Nov;25(1):105-123.
6
Identifying factors associated with criminal responsibility by analyzing court trial verdicts.通过分析法庭审判裁决来确定与刑事责任相关的因素。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Jul-Aug;77:101702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101702. Epub 2021 May 4.
7
Attention, reward, and inhibition: symptomatic features of ADHD and issues for offenders in the criminal justice system.注意力、奖赏与抑制:注意缺陷多动障碍的症状特征及刑事司法系统中罪犯面临的问题。
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2017 Mar;9(1):5-10. doi: 10.1007/s12402-016-0203-8. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
8
Offenders convicted of child sexual exploitation material offences: characteristics of offenders and an exploration of judicial censure.被判犯有儿童性剥削材料罪的罪犯:罪犯特征及司法谴责探究
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Apr 15;27(4):647-664. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1742240. eCollection 2020.
9
Brief Report: Sentencing Outcomes for Offenders on the Autism Spectrum.简要报告:自闭症谱系罪犯的判决结果。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3314-3320. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05212-4. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
[Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].[法庭上的神经科学:从责任到危险性,法国新法律引发的伦理问题]
Encephale. 2015 Oct;41(5):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and support of autistic individuals within the UK Criminal Justice System: a practical approach based upon professional consensus with input from lived experience.英国刑事司法系统中自闭症个体的识别与支持:基于专业共识并结合实际经验的实用方法。
BMC Med. 2024 Apr 12;22(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03320-3.
2
Defendants with intellectual disability and autism spectrum conditions: the perspective of clinicians working across three jurisdictions.患有智力残疾和自闭症谱系障碍的被告:来自三个司法管辖区临床医生的观点。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Nov 3;29(5):698-717. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1976297. eCollection 2022.
3
A Systematic Review of Autistic People and the Criminal Justice System: An Update of King and Murphy (2014).自闭症人群与刑事司法系统:综述 King 和 Murphy(2014)的更新
J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Aug;53(8):3151-3179. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05590-3. Epub 2022 May 30.
4
Brief Report: Sentencing Outcomes for Offenders on the Autism Spectrum.简要报告:自闭症谱系罪犯的判决结果。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2022 Jul;52(7):3314-3320. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05212-4. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
5
How information about perpetrators' nature and nurture influences assessments of their character, mental states, and deserved punishment.关于犯罪者的天性和教养如何影响对他们的性格、精神状态和应受惩罚的评估。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 22;14(10):e0224093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224093. eCollection 2019.
6
Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.模拟陪审员对自闭症被告可信度和罪责的感知。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2019 Mar;49(3):996-1010. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3803-7.
7
Educator of the Court: The Role of the Expert Witness in Cases Involving Autism Spectrum Disorder.法庭教育工作者:专家证人在自闭症谱系障碍相关案件中的作用。
Psychol Crime Law. 2017;23(6):575-600. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284218. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
8
Judges' views on evidence of genetic contributions to mental disorders in court.法官对法庭上有关基因对精神障碍影响的证据的看法。
J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2016;27(4):586-600. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2016.1173718. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism.简短报告:关于对高功能自闭症罪犯量刑的司法态度
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Aug;46(8):2770-2773. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2798-1.
10
Potential implications of research on genetic or heritable contributions to pedophilia for the objectives of criminal law.关于恋童癖的遗传或可遗传因素的研究对刑法目标的潜在影响。
Recent Adv DNA Gene Seq. 2014;8(2):65-77. doi: 10.2174/2352092209666141211233857.

本文引用的文献

1
Judicial Perceptions of Media Portrayals of Offenders with High Functioning Autistic Spectrum Disorders.司法部门对高功能自闭症谱系障碍罪犯的媒体形象塑造的认知。
Int J Criminol Sociol. 2014;3:46-60. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.04.
2
The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths?双刃剑:生物力学是否会增加或减少法官对精神变态者的量刑?
Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):846-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1219569.
3
Genetics of autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍的遗传学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep;15(9):409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Juvenile psychopathy and judicial decision making: an empirical analysis of an ethical dilemma.青少年精神病态与司法决策:对一个伦理困境的实证分析
Behav Sci Law. 2008;26(2):151-65. doi: 10.1002/bsl.792.
5
Asperger's disorder and criminal behavior: forensic-psychiatric considerations.阿斯伯格综合征与犯罪行为:法医精神病学考量
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2006;34(3):374-84.
6
[Autism and Asperger syndrome: an overview].[自闭症与阿斯伯格综合征:概述]
Braz J Psychiatry. 2006 May;28 Suppl 1:S3-11. doi: 10.1590/s1516-44462006000500002. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
7
The death penalty and persons with mental disabilities: a lethal dose of stigma, sanism, fear of violence, and faulty predictions of dangerousness.死刑与精神残疾者:一剂致命的污名化、健全主义、暴力恐惧及对危险性的错误预测。
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 2005 Sep-Oct;29(5):667-9.
8
Overcoming the myth of free will in criminal law: the true impact of the genetic revolution.破除刑法中自由意志的神话:基因革命的真正影响
Duke Law J. 2003 Mar;52(5):1031-53.
9
Brief report: violence in Asperger syndrome, a critique.简短报告:阿斯伯格综合征中的暴力行为,一项评论。
J Autism Dev Disord. 1991 Sep;21(3):349-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02207331.