• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Incidence of Wrong-Site Surgery List Errors for a 2-Year Period in a Single National Health Service Board.单一国民保健制度委员会两年间手术部位错误列表错误的发生率。
J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):79-83. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000426.
2
Can the surgical checklist reduce the risk of wrong site surgery in orthopaedics?--Can the checklist help? Supporting evidence from analysis of a national patient incident reporting system.手术清单能否降低骨科手术部位错误的风险?——清单是否有效?基于全国患者不良事件上报系统分析的支持证据。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Apr 18;6:18. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-18.
3
Wrong intraocular lens events-what lessons have we learned? A review of incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System: 2010-2014 versus 2003-2010.人工晶状体植入失误事件——我们吸取了哪些教训?对向国家报告与学习系统报告的事件的回顾:2010 - 2014年与2003 - 2010年对比
Eye (Lond). 2016 Aug;30(8):1049-55. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.87. Epub 2016 May 13.
4
Prevention of wrong-site and wrong-patient surgical errors.预防手术部位错误和患者错误相关的手术失误。
Prescrire Int. 2013 Jan;22(134):14-6.
5
Wrong-side/wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and wrong-patient adverse events: Are they preventable?手术部位错误、手术操作错误和患者错误相关不良事件:它们是否可预防?
Arch Surg. 2006 Sep;141(9):931-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.9.931.
6
Common general surgical never events: analysis of NHS England never event data.常见普通外科的无预警事件:英国国家医疗服务体系无预警事件数据的分析。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Mar 17;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab045.
7
[Wrong site surgery : Incidence, risk factors and prevention].[手术部位错误:发生率、危险因素及预防]
Chirurg. 2015 Nov;86(11):1034-40. doi: 10.1007/s00104-014-2983-8.
8
Common preventable errors in hand surgery: Analysis of NHS never events data and a proposed safety checklist.手部外科常见可预防的错误:NHS 无预警事件数据的分析及一份安全检查表的建议。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2023;34(3):169-178. doi: 10.3233/JRS-220030.
9
Incidence and root cause analysis of wrong-site pain management procedures: a multicenter study.错误部位疼痛管理程序发生率及根本原因分析:一项多中心研究。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Mar;112(3):711-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cf892d.
10
Wrong-Site Surgery in California, 2007-2014.2007 - 2014年加利福尼亚州的手术部位错误事件
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jul;157(1):48-52. doi: 10.1177/0194599817693226. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the MISSCARE survey OR - Swedish version.MISSCARE调查问卷OR - 瑞典语版本的翻译、文化调适及心理测量特性
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 5;24(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03548-1.
2
Intelligent Verification Tool for Surgical Information of Ophthalmic Patients: A Study Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology.眼科患者手术信息智能验证工具:基于人工智能技术的研究
J Patient Saf. 2025 Mar 1;21(2):62-68. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001295. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
Identifying a list of healthcare 'never events' to effect system change: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.确定一组医疗保健“永不发生”事件,以推动系统变革:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jun;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002264.
4
Insurance Claims for Wrong-Side, Wrong-Organ, Wrong-Procedure, or Wrong-Person Surgical Errors: A Retrospective Study for 10 Years.保险理赔中的左右侧、器官、手术步骤或手术对象错误:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Jan 1;19(1):e13-e17. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001080. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
5
Criteria for recommendations after perioperative sentinel events.术后哨兵事件后推荐的标准。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Sep;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001493.
6
Prioritising recommendations following analyses of adverse events in healthcare: a systematic review.医疗保健中不良事件分析后的推荐优先级:系统评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Oct;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000843.

本文引用的文献

1
Wrong-Site Surgery, Retained Surgical Items, and Surgical Fires : A Systematic Review of Surgical Never Events.错误部位手术、遗留手术器械和手术火灾:手术无预警事件的系统回顾。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):796-805. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0301.
2
Errors upstream and downstream to the Universal Protocol associated with wrong surgery events in the Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中与错误手术事件相关的通用协议上下游的错误。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jul;210(1):6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.030. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Measuring variation in use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in the operating room: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.衡量手术室中世界卫生组织手术安全核对表使用情况的差异:一项多中心前瞻性横断面研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jan;220(1):1-11.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
4
Is your office helping you prevent wrong site surgery?你的办公室是否在帮助你预防手术部位错误?
Bull Am Coll Surg. 2014 Apr;99(4):28-31.
5
Safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a framework to guide clinical teams and healthcare organisations in maintaining safety.医疗保健中的安全测量与监测:指导临床团队和医疗保健机构维护安全的框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Aug;23(8):670-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002757. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
6
Incidence of neurosurgical wrong-site surgery before and after implementation of the universal protocol.神经外科错误部位手术在实施通用协议前后的发生率。
Neurosurgery. 2013 Apr;72(4):590-5; discussion 595. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318283c9ea.
7
Characteristics and costs of surgical scheduling errors.手术排程错误的特征与成本。
Am J Surg. 2012 Oct;204(4):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.01.011.
8
The occurrence of wrong-site surgery self-reported by candidates for certification by the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery.美国骨科委员会认证候选人报告的手术部位错误事件。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jan 4;94(1):e2(1-12). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00524.
9
Outcome of 6 years of protocol use for preventing wrong site office surgery.预防手术部位错误的方案使用 6 年的结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Oct;65(4):807-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.011. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Pre-surgery briefings and safety climate in the operating theatre.术前简报和手术室的安全氛围。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Aug;20(8):711-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.032672. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

单一国民保健制度委员会两年间手术部位错误列表错误的发生率。

Incidence of Wrong-Site Surgery List Errors for a 2-Year Period in a Single National Health Service Board.

机构信息

From the Scottish Centre for Simulation & Clinical Human Factors.

Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2020 Mar;16(1):79-83. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000426.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000426
PMID:28984728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7046137/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Wrong-site/side surgical "never events" continue to cause considerable harm to patients, healthcare professionals, and organizations within the United Kingdom. Incidence has remained static despite the mandatory introduction of surgical checklists. Operating theater list errors have been identified as a regular contributor to these never events. The aims of the study were to identify and to learn from the incidence of wrong-site/side list errors in a single National Health Service board.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a single National Health Service board serving a population of approximately 300,000. All theater teams systematically recorded errors identified at the morning theater brief or checklist pause as part of a board-wide quality improvement project. Data were reviewed for a 2-year period from May 2013 to April 2015, and all episodes of wrong-site/side list errors were identified for analysis.

RESULTS

No episodes of wrong-site/side surgery were recorded for the study period. A total of 86 wrong-site/side list errors were identified in 29,480 cases (0.29%). There was considerable variation in incidence between surgical specialties with ophthalmology recording the largest proportion of errors per number of surgical cases performed (1 in 87 cases) and gynecology recording the smallest proportion (1 in 2671 cases). The commonest errors to occur were "wrong-side" list errors (62/86, 72.1%).

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to identify incidence of wrong-site/site list errors in the United Kingdom. Reducing list errors should form part of a wider risk reduction strategy to reduce wrong-site/side never events. Human factors barrier management analysis may help identify the most effective checks and controls to reduce list errors incidence, whereas resilience engineering approaches should help develop understanding of how to best capture and neutralize errors.

摘要

引言

在英国,错误部位/侧手术“从未发生过的事件”仍然给患者、医疗保健专业人员和组织造成相当大的伤害。尽管强制性引入了手术核对表,但发病率仍然保持不变。手术室清单错误已被确定为这些从未发生过的事件的一个常见原因。该研究的目的是在一个单一的英国国民保健系统委员会中确定并从错误部位/侧清单错误的发生率中吸取教训。

方法

该研究在一个为约 30 万人口提供服务的单一英国国民保健系统委员会中进行。所有手术室团队都系统地记录了在早晨手术室简介或核对表暂停期间发现的错误,作为委员会范围内质量改进项目的一部分。数据审查时间为 2013 年 5 月至 2015 年 4 月的 2 年期间,对所有错误部位/侧清单错误的事件进行了分析。

结果

在研究期间未记录手术部位/侧手术错误。在 29480 例病例中发现了 86 例错误部位/侧清单错误(0.29%)。各手术专业的发病率差异很大,眼科记录的错误发生率最高(每 87 例手术中就有 1 例),妇产科记录的错误发生率最低(每 2671 例手术中就有 1 例)。最常见的错误是“错误侧”清单错误(62/86,72.1%)。

讨论

这是英国首次确定错误部位/侧清单错误的发生率。减少清单错误应成为更广泛的风险降低策略的一部分,以减少错误部位/侧从未发生过的事件。人为因素障碍管理分析可能有助于确定减少清单错误发生率的最有效检查和控制措施,而弹性工程方法应有助于了解如何最好地捕获和中和错误。